At this medium-sized urban hospital, the chair of the ethics committee usually responded to requests for ethics consultations by either personally doing consults, referring others to another member of the committee who was either on-call or knowledgeable about a specific issue, or by convening the entire ethics committee to discuss challenging cases. I was a community member, recruited by the chair due to my academic appointment and credentials in ethics. I received a phone call over the weekend that there would be an urgent ethics committee meeting on Tuesday morning at 7 a.m. An ethics consultation request had been received on Friday. The ethics committee chair had reviewed the case and decided it merited full committee review. Approximately ten clinicians and other hospital employees were present for the Tuesday morning meeting. We learned immediately that Mr. Leary, the patient, had died the evening before at his home. The rest of the case unfolded in the ensuing discussion. Mr. Leary was described as an independent 76-year-old curmudgeon prior to a stroke eight weeks ago. The stroke left him with complete left-sided paralysis. He suffered a second stroke two weeks after the first, resulting in both receptive and expressive aphasia – he could neither understand speech nor could he formulate words. He also appeared depressed after the second event. Three weeks ago, he suffered a third stroke. While this stroke worsened his physical condition, it seemed to improve his mood. At times, he appeared almost jovial. He became cooperative with care, even attempting to assist with shaving each morning.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)