Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury

Results of a prospective study

Ali Salim, Burapat Sangthong, Matthew Martin, Carlos Brown, David Plurad, Demetrios Demetriades, James G. Tyburski, Tyler Hughes, J. Stephen Marshall, Karen Brasel, Richard L. Jamison, Baiba J. Grube

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

237 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: The use of liberal whole body imaging (pan scan) in patients based on mechanism is warranted, even in evaluable patients with no obvious signs of chest or abdominal injury. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Academic level I trauma center. Patients: All patients admitted following blunt multisystem trauma. Intervention: Pan scan, including computed tomography (CT) of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with the following inclusion criteria: (1) no visible evidence of chest or abdominal injury, (2) hemodynamically stable, (3) normal abdominal examination results in a neurologically intact patient or unevaluable abdominal examination results secondary to a depressed level of consciousness, and (4) significant mechanisms of injury. Radiological findings and changes in treatment based on these findings were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Any alteration in the normal treatment plan as a direct result of CT scan findings. These alterations include early hospital discharge, admission for observation, operative intervention, and additional diagnostic studies or interventions. Results: One thousand patients underwent pan scan during the 18-month observation period, of which 592 were evaluable patients with no obvious signs of abdominal injury. Clinically significant abnormalities were found in 3.5% of head CT scans, 5.1% of cervical spine CT scans, 19.6% of chest CT scans, and 7.1% of abdominal CT scans. Overall treatment was changed in 18.9% of patients based on abnormal CT scan findings. Conclusions: The use of pan scan based on mechanism in awake, evaluable patients is warranted. Clinically significant abnormalities are not uncommon, resulting in a change in treatment in nearly 19% of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-475
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume141
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Whole Body Imaging
Prospective Studies
Wounds and Injuries
Tomography
Abdominal Injuries
Thoracic Injuries
Spine
Thorax
Head
Observation
Consciousness Disorders
Trauma Centers
Therapeutics
Pelvis
Abdomen
Observational Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Salim, A., Sangthong, B., Martin, M., Brown, C., Plurad, D., Demetriades, D., ... Grube, B. J. (2006). Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: Results of a prospective study. Archives of Surgery, 141(5), 468-475. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.5.468

Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury : Results of a prospective study. / Salim, Ali; Sangthong, Burapat; Martin, Matthew; Brown, Carlos; Plurad, David; Demetriades, Demetrios; Tyburski, James G.; Hughes, Tyler; Marshall, J. Stephen; Brasel, Karen; Jamison, Richard L.; Grube, Baiba J.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 141, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 468-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salim, A, Sangthong, B, Martin, M, Brown, C, Plurad, D, Demetriades, D, Tyburski, JG, Hughes, T, Marshall, JS, Brasel, K, Jamison, RL & Grube, BJ 2006, 'Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: Results of a prospective study', Archives of Surgery, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 468-475. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.5.468
Salim, Ali ; Sangthong, Burapat ; Martin, Matthew ; Brown, Carlos ; Plurad, David ; Demetriades, Demetrios ; Tyburski, James G. ; Hughes, Tyler ; Marshall, J. Stephen ; Brasel, Karen ; Jamison, Richard L. ; Grube, Baiba J. / Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury : Results of a prospective study. In: Archives of Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 141, No. 5. pp. 468-475.
@article{46854d0a46254ceaa9a4a847cc314412,
title = "Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: Results of a prospective study",
abstract = "Hypothesis: The use of liberal whole body imaging (pan scan) in patients based on mechanism is warranted, even in evaluable patients with no obvious signs of chest or abdominal injury. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Academic level I trauma center. Patients: All patients admitted following blunt multisystem trauma. Intervention: Pan scan, including computed tomography (CT) of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with the following inclusion criteria: (1) no visible evidence of chest or abdominal injury, (2) hemodynamically stable, (3) normal abdominal examination results in a neurologically intact patient or unevaluable abdominal examination results secondary to a depressed level of consciousness, and (4) significant mechanisms of injury. Radiological findings and changes in treatment based on these findings were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Any alteration in the normal treatment plan as a direct result of CT scan findings. These alterations include early hospital discharge, admission for observation, operative intervention, and additional diagnostic studies or interventions. Results: One thousand patients underwent pan scan during the 18-month observation period, of which 592 were evaluable patients with no obvious signs of abdominal injury. Clinically significant abnormalities were found in 3.5{\%} of head CT scans, 5.1{\%} of cervical spine CT scans, 19.6{\%} of chest CT scans, and 7.1{\%} of abdominal CT scans. Overall treatment was changed in 18.9{\%} of patients based on abnormal CT scan findings. Conclusions: The use of pan scan based on mechanism in awake, evaluable patients is warranted. Clinically significant abnormalities are not uncommon, resulting in a change in treatment in nearly 19{\%} of patients.",
author = "Ali Salim and Burapat Sangthong and Matthew Martin and Carlos Brown and David Plurad and Demetrios Demetriades and Tyburski, {James G.} and Tyler Hughes and Marshall, {J. Stephen} and Karen Brasel and Jamison, {Richard L.} and Grube, {Baiba J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.141.5.468",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "468--475",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury

T2 - Results of a prospective study

AU - Salim, Ali

AU - Sangthong, Burapat

AU - Martin, Matthew

AU - Brown, Carlos

AU - Plurad, David

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

AU - Tyburski, James G.

AU - Hughes, Tyler

AU - Marshall, J. Stephen

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Jamison, Richard L.

AU - Grube, Baiba J.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Hypothesis: The use of liberal whole body imaging (pan scan) in patients based on mechanism is warranted, even in evaluable patients with no obvious signs of chest or abdominal injury. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Academic level I trauma center. Patients: All patients admitted following blunt multisystem trauma. Intervention: Pan scan, including computed tomography (CT) of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with the following inclusion criteria: (1) no visible evidence of chest or abdominal injury, (2) hemodynamically stable, (3) normal abdominal examination results in a neurologically intact patient or unevaluable abdominal examination results secondary to a depressed level of consciousness, and (4) significant mechanisms of injury. Radiological findings and changes in treatment based on these findings were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Any alteration in the normal treatment plan as a direct result of CT scan findings. These alterations include early hospital discharge, admission for observation, operative intervention, and additional diagnostic studies or interventions. Results: One thousand patients underwent pan scan during the 18-month observation period, of which 592 were evaluable patients with no obvious signs of abdominal injury. Clinically significant abnormalities were found in 3.5% of head CT scans, 5.1% of cervical spine CT scans, 19.6% of chest CT scans, and 7.1% of abdominal CT scans. Overall treatment was changed in 18.9% of patients based on abnormal CT scan findings. Conclusions: The use of pan scan based on mechanism in awake, evaluable patients is warranted. Clinically significant abnormalities are not uncommon, resulting in a change in treatment in nearly 19% of patients.

AB - Hypothesis: The use of liberal whole body imaging (pan scan) in patients based on mechanism is warranted, even in evaluable patients with no obvious signs of chest or abdominal injury. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Academic level I trauma center. Patients: All patients admitted following blunt multisystem trauma. Intervention: Pan scan, including computed tomography (CT) of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with the following inclusion criteria: (1) no visible evidence of chest or abdominal injury, (2) hemodynamically stable, (3) normal abdominal examination results in a neurologically intact patient or unevaluable abdominal examination results secondary to a depressed level of consciousness, and (4) significant mechanisms of injury. Radiological findings and changes in treatment based on these findings were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Any alteration in the normal treatment plan as a direct result of CT scan findings. These alterations include early hospital discharge, admission for observation, operative intervention, and additional diagnostic studies or interventions. Results: One thousand patients underwent pan scan during the 18-month observation period, of which 592 were evaluable patients with no obvious signs of abdominal injury. Clinically significant abnormalities were found in 3.5% of head CT scans, 5.1% of cervical spine CT scans, 19.6% of chest CT scans, and 7.1% of abdominal CT scans. Overall treatment was changed in 18.9% of patients based on abnormal CT scan findings. Conclusions: The use of pan scan based on mechanism in awake, evaluable patients is warranted. Clinically significant abnormalities are not uncommon, resulting in a change in treatment in nearly 19% of patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646597279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646597279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.468

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.468

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 468

EP - 475

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 5

ER -