Voluntary control of postural equilibrium patterns

John J. Buchanan, Fay Horak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to voluntarily transit from one whole-body movement to another is based on the multisensory integration of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory information. The role of functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints on the ability to voluntarily transit between whole-body movements was studied by requiring subjects to switch from a head-fixed-to-surface to head-fixed-in-space postural pattern (and vice versa). The head-fixed-to-surface pattern required an erect stance characterized by an in-phase relationship between center of pressure (CoP) and platform motion. The head-fixed-in-space pattern required subjects to fix trunk-head position in-space while producing an anti-phase relationship between CoP and platform motion. The voluntary transition was performed with and without vision while standing on a surface oscillating in the anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. The support surface oscillated at five frequencies (0.2-1Hz) with amplitude fixed at 15cm. The voluntary transition was initiated with an auditory cue. The appropriate CoP-platform phase relationship for the two postural patterns was produced for all frequencies with and without vision. Upper-trunk kinematics revealed that subjects often failed to produce the head-fixed-to-surface pattern for frequencies ≥0.6Hz, while producing the head-fixed-in-space pattern at all frequencies with vision. Without vision, neither pattern was produced consistently based on upper-trunk kinematics. These findings demonstrate separate control processes for upper- and lower-body motion and that functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints can facilitate or inhibit voluntary production of whole-body movements based on these control processes. The results are discussed in reference to neurological substrates that may be involved in the planning and execution of motor set-switching. The experimental protocol we employ may also have application as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of postural deficits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-140
Number of pages20
JournalBehavioural Brain Research
Volume143
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 14 2003

Fingerprint

Postural Balance
Head
Aptitude
Biomechanical Phenomena
Pressure
Cues

Keywords

  • Hierarchical models
  • Intention
  • Pattern-switching
  • Postural control
  • Vision
  • Voluntary movement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Voluntary control of postural equilibrium patterns. / Buchanan, John J.; Horak, Fay.

In: Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 143, No. 2, 14.08.2003, p. 121-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buchanan, John J. ; Horak, Fay. / Voluntary control of postural equilibrium patterns. In: Behavioural Brain Research. 2003 ; Vol. 143, No. 2. pp. 121-140.
@article{6d7f670ba076426d929d73062d943245,
title = "Voluntary control of postural equilibrium patterns",
abstract = "The ability to voluntarily transit from one whole-body movement to another is based on the multisensory integration of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory information. The role of functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints on the ability to voluntarily transit between whole-body movements was studied by requiring subjects to switch from a head-fixed-to-surface to head-fixed-in-space postural pattern (and vice versa). The head-fixed-to-surface pattern required an erect stance characterized by an in-phase relationship between center of pressure (CoP) and platform motion. The head-fixed-in-space pattern required subjects to fix trunk-head position in-space while producing an anti-phase relationship between CoP and platform motion. The voluntary transition was performed with and without vision while standing on a surface oscillating in the anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. The support surface oscillated at five frequencies (0.2-1Hz) with amplitude fixed at 15cm. The voluntary transition was initiated with an auditory cue. The appropriate CoP-platform phase relationship for the two postural patterns was produced for all frequencies with and without vision. Upper-trunk kinematics revealed that subjects often failed to produce the head-fixed-to-surface pattern for frequencies ≥0.6Hz, while producing the head-fixed-in-space pattern at all frequencies with vision. Without vision, neither pattern was produced consistently based on upper-trunk kinematics. These findings demonstrate separate control processes for upper- and lower-body motion and that functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints can facilitate or inhibit voluntary production of whole-body movements based on these control processes. The results are discussed in reference to neurological substrates that may be involved in the planning and execution of motor set-switching. The experimental protocol we employ may also have application as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of postural deficits.",
keywords = "Hierarchical models, Intention, Pattern-switching, Postural control, Vision, Voluntary movement",
author = "Buchanan, {John J.} and Fay Horak",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00038-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "121--140",
journal = "Behavioural Brain Research",
issn = "0166-4328",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voluntary control of postural equilibrium patterns

AU - Buchanan, John J.

AU - Horak, Fay

PY - 2003/8/14

Y1 - 2003/8/14

N2 - The ability to voluntarily transit from one whole-body movement to another is based on the multisensory integration of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory information. The role of functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints on the ability to voluntarily transit between whole-body movements was studied by requiring subjects to switch from a head-fixed-to-surface to head-fixed-in-space postural pattern (and vice versa). The head-fixed-to-surface pattern required an erect stance characterized by an in-phase relationship between center of pressure (CoP) and platform motion. The head-fixed-in-space pattern required subjects to fix trunk-head position in-space while producing an anti-phase relationship between CoP and platform motion. The voluntary transition was performed with and without vision while standing on a surface oscillating in the anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. The support surface oscillated at five frequencies (0.2-1Hz) with amplitude fixed at 15cm. The voluntary transition was initiated with an auditory cue. The appropriate CoP-platform phase relationship for the two postural patterns was produced for all frequencies with and without vision. Upper-trunk kinematics revealed that subjects often failed to produce the head-fixed-to-surface pattern for frequencies ≥0.6Hz, while producing the head-fixed-in-space pattern at all frequencies with vision. Without vision, neither pattern was produced consistently based on upper-trunk kinematics. These findings demonstrate separate control processes for upper- and lower-body motion and that functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints can facilitate or inhibit voluntary production of whole-body movements based on these control processes. The results are discussed in reference to neurological substrates that may be involved in the planning and execution of motor set-switching. The experimental protocol we employ may also have application as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of postural deficits.

AB - The ability to voluntarily transit from one whole-body movement to another is based on the multisensory integration of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory information. The role of functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints on the ability to voluntarily transit between whole-body movements was studied by requiring subjects to switch from a head-fixed-to-surface to head-fixed-in-space postural pattern (and vice versa). The head-fixed-to-surface pattern required an erect stance characterized by an in-phase relationship between center of pressure (CoP) and platform motion. The head-fixed-in-space pattern required subjects to fix trunk-head position in-space while producing an anti-phase relationship between CoP and platform motion. The voluntary transition was performed with and without vision while standing on a surface oscillating in the anterior-posterior (A/P) direction. The support surface oscillated at five frequencies (0.2-1Hz) with amplitude fixed at 15cm. The voluntary transition was initiated with an auditory cue. The appropriate CoP-platform phase relationship for the two postural patterns was produced for all frequencies with and without vision. Upper-trunk kinematics revealed that subjects often failed to produce the head-fixed-to-surface pattern for frequencies ≥0.6Hz, while producing the head-fixed-in-space pattern at all frequencies with vision. Without vision, neither pattern was produced consistently based on upper-trunk kinematics. These findings demonstrate separate control processes for upper- and lower-body motion and that functional sensory ranges and mechanical constraints can facilitate or inhibit voluntary production of whole-body movements based on these control processes. The results are discussed in reference to neurological substrates that may be involved in the planning and execution of motor set-switching. The experimental protocol we employ may also have application as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of postural deficits.

KW - Hierarchical models

KW - Intention

KW - Pattern-switching

KW - Postural control

KW - Vision

KW - Voluntary movement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043095505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043095505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00038-X

DO - 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00038-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 12900039

AN - SCOPUS:0043095505

VL - 143

SP - 121

EP - 140

JO - Behavioural Brain Research

JF - Behavioural Brain Research

SN - 0166-4328

IS - 2

ER -