Volumetric analysis from a harmonized multisite brain MRI study of a single subject with multiple sclerosis

R. T. Shinohara, J. Oh, G. Nair, P. A. Calabresi, C. Davatzikos, J. Doshi, R. G. Henry, G. Kim, K. A. Linn, N. Papinutto, D. Pelletier, D. L. Pham, D. S. Reich, William Rooney, S. Roy, W. Stern, S. Tummala, F. Yousuf, A. Zhu, N. L. Sicotte & 1 others R. Bakshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging can be used to measure structural changes in the brains of individuals with multiple sclerosis and is essential for diagnosis, longitudinal monitoring, and therapy evaluation. The North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative steering committee developed a uniform high-resolution 3T MR imaging protocol relevant to the quantification of cerebral lesions and atrophy and implemented it at 7 sites across the United States. To assess intersite variability in scan data, we imaged a volunteer with relapsing-remitting MS with a scan-rescan at each site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging was acquired on Siemens scanners (4 Skyra, 2 Tim Trio, and 1 Verio). Expert segmentations were manually obtained for T1-hypointense and T2 (FLAIR) hyperintense lesions. Several automated lesion-detection and whole-brain, cortical, and deep gray matter volumetric pipelines were applied. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess variability across sites, as well as systematic biases in the volumetric measurements that were site-related. RESULTS: Systematic biases due to site differences in expert-traced lesion measurements were significant (P < .01 for both T1 and T2 lesion volumes), with site explaining >90% of the variation (range, 13.0 -16.4 mL in T1 and 15.9 -20.1 mL in T2) in lesion volumes. Site also explained>80% of the variation in most automated volumetric measurements. Output measures clustered according to scanner models, with similar results from the Skyra versus the other 2 units. CONCLUSIONS: Even in multicenter studies with consistent scanner field strength and manufacturer after protocol harmonization, systematic differences can lead to severe biases in volumetric analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1501-1509
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Multiple Sclerosis
Brain
Multicenter Studies
Atrophy
Volunteers
Therapeutics
Gray Matter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Shinohara, R. T., Oh, J., Nair, G., Calabresi, P. A., Davatzikos, C., Doshi, J., ... Bakshi, R. (2017). Volumetric analysis from a harmonized multisite brain MRI study of a single subject with multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 38(8), 1501-1509. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5254

Volumetric analysis from a harmonized multisite brain MRI study of a single subject with multiple sclerosis. / Shinohara, R. T.; Oh, J.; Nair, G.; Calabresi, P. A.; Davatzikos, C.; Doshi, J.; Henry, R. G.; Kim, G.; Linn, K. A.; Papinutto, N.; Pelletier, D.; Pham, D. L.; Reich, D. S.; Rooney, William; Roy, S.; Stern, W.; Tummala, S.; Yousuf, F.; Zhu, A.; Sicotte, N. L.; Bakshi, R.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 38, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 1501-1509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shinohara, RT, Oh, J, Nair, G, Calabresi, PA, Davatzikos, C, Doshi, J, Henry, RG, Kim, G, Linn, KA, Papinutto, N, Pelletier, D, Pham, DL, Reich, DS, Rooney, W, Roy, S, Stern, W, Tummala, S, Yousuf, F, Zhu, A, Sicotte, NL & Bakshi, R 2017, 'Volumetric analysis from a harmonized multisite brain MRI study of a single subject with multiple sclerosis', American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1501-1509. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5254
Shinohara, R. T. ; Oh, J. ; Nair, G. ; Calabresi, P. A. ; Davatzikos, C. ; Doshi, J. ; Henry, R. G. ; Kim, G. ; Linn, K. A. ; Papinutto, N. ; Pelletier, D. ; Pham, D. L. ; Reich, D. S. ; Rooney, William ; Roy, S. ; Stern, W. ; Tummala, S. ; Yousuf, F. ; Zhu, A. ; Sicotte, N. L. ; Bakshi, R. / Volumetric analysis from a harmonized multisite brain MRI study of a single subject with multiple sclerosis. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 1501-1509.
@article{2a4fe05770b7451ab4f0000c542d0108,
title = "Volumetric analysis from a harmonized multisite brain MRI study of a single subject with multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging can be used to measure structural changes in the brains of individuals with multiple sclerosis and is essential for diagnosis, longitudinal monitoring, and therapy evaluation. The North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative steering committee developed a uniform high-resolution 3T MR imaging protocol relevant to the quantification of cerebral lesions and atrophy and implemented it at 7 sites across the United States. To assess intersite variability in scan data, we imaged a volunteer with relapsing-remitting MS with a scan-rescan at each site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging was acquired on Siemens scanners (4 Skyra, 2 Tim Trio, and 1 Verio). Expert segmentations were manually obtained for T1-hypointense and T2 (FLAIR) hyperintense lesions. Several automated lesion-detection and whole-brain, cortical, and deep gray matter volumetric pipelines were applied. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess variability across sites, as well as systematic biases in the volumetric measurements that were site-related. RESULTS: Systematic biases due to site differences in expert-traced lesion measurements were significant (P < .01 for both T1 and T2 lesion volumes), with site explaining >90{\%} of the variation (range, 13.0 -16.4 mL in T1 and 15.9 -20.1 mL in T2) in lesion volumes. Site also explained>80{\%} of the variation in most automated volumetric measurements. Output measures clustered according to scanner models, with similar results from the Skyra versus the other 2 units. CONCLUSIONS: Even in multicenter studies with consistent scanner field strength and manufacturer after protocol harmonization, systematic differences can lead to severe biases in volumetric analyses.",
author = "Shinohara, {R. T.} and J. Oh and G. Nair and Calabresi, {P. A.} and C. Davatzikos and J. Doshi and Henry, {R. G.} and G. Kim and Linn, {K. A.} and N. Papinutto and D. Pelletier and Pham, {D. L.} and Reich, {D. S.} and William Rooney and S. Roy and W. Stern and S. Tummala and F. Yousuf and A. Zhu and Sicotte, {N. L.} and R. Bakshi",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A5254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1501--1509",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volumetric analysis from a harmonized multisite brain MRI study of a single subject with multiple sclerosis

AU - Shinohara, R. T.

AU - Oh, J.

AU - Nair, G.

AU - Calabresi, P. A.

AU - Davatzikos, C.

AU - Doshi, J.

AU - Henry, R. G.

AU - Kim, G.

AU - Linn, K. A.

AU - Papinutto, N.

AU - Pelletier, D.

AU - Pham, D. L.

AU - Reich, D. S.

AU - Rooney, William

AU - Roy, S.

AU - Stern, W.

AU - Tummala, S.

AU - Yousuf, F.

AU - Zhu, A.

AU - Sicotte, N. L.

AU - Bakshi, R.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging can be used to measure structural changes in the brains of individuals with multiple sclerosis and is essential for diagnosis, longitudinal monitoring, and therapy evaluation. The North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative steering committee developed a uniform high-resolution 3T MR imaging protocol relevant to the quantification of cerebral lesions and atrophy and implemented it at 7 sites across the United States. To assess intersite variability in scan data, we imaged a volunteer with relapsing-remitting MS with a scan-rescan at each site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging was acquired on Siemens scanners (4 Skyra, 2 Tim Trio, and 1 Verio). Expert segmentations were manually obtained for T1-hypointense and T2 (FLAIR) hyperintense lesions. Several automated lesion-detection and whole-brain, cortical, and deep gray matter volumetric pipelines were applied. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess variability across sites, as well as systematic biases in the volumetric measurements that were site-related. RESULTS: Systematic biases due to site differences in expert-traced lesion measurements were significant (P < .01 for both T1 and T2 lesion volumes), with site explaining >90% of the variation (range, 13.0 -16.4 mL in T1 and 15.9 -20.1 mL in T2) in lesion volumes. Site also explained>80% of the variation in most automated volumetric measurements. Output measures clustered according to scanner models, with similar results from the Skyra versus the other 2 units. CONCLUSIONS: Even in multicenter studies with consistent scanner field strength and manufacturer after protocol harmonization, systematic differences can lead to severe biases in volumetric analyses.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging can be used to measure structural changes in the brains of individuals with multiple sclerosis and is essential for diagnosis, longitudinal monitoring, and therapy evaluation. The North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative steering committee developed a uniform high-resolution 3T MR imaging protocol relevant to the quantification of cerebral lesions and atrophy and implemented it at 7 sites across the United States. To assess intersite variability in scan data, we imaged a volunteer with relapsing-remitting MS with a scan-rescan at each site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging was acquired on Siemens scanners (4 Skyra, 2 Tim Trio, and 1 Verio). Expert segmentations were manually obtained for T1-hypointense and T2 (FLAIR) hyperintense lesions. Several automated lesion-detection and whole-brain, cortical, and deep gray matter volumetric pipelines were applied. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess variability across sites, as well as systematic biases in the volumetric measurements that were site-related. RESULTS: Systematic biases due to site differences in expert-traced lesion measurements were significant (P < .01 for both T1 and T2 lesion volumes), with site explaining >90% of the variation (range, 13.0 -16.4 mL in T1 and 15.9 -20.1 mL in T2) in lesion volumes. Site also explained>80% of the variation in most automated volumetric measurements. Output measures clustered according to scanner models, with similar results from the Skyra versus the other 2 units. CONCLUSIONS: Even in multicenter studies with consistent scanner field strength and manufacturer after protocol harmonization, systematic differences can lead to severe biases in volumetric analyses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027405388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027405388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A5254

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A5254

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1501

EP - 1509

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 8

ER -