Veterans Administration support for medical research

Opinions of the endangered species of physician-scientists

Stanley Zucker, John Jr Crabbe, George Cooper IV, Fred Finkelman, Corey Largman, Robert W. Mccarley, Louis Rice, Janet Rubin, Bruce Richardson, Frederick Seil, Gordon L. Snider, Arthur Vandenbark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past three decades the Veterans Affairs (VA) Research program has evolved into a powerful, peer-reviewed funding mechanism for basic and transnational research that has resulted in numerous important contributions to medical science and improvements in patient care. Continuity in VA Merit Review funding has fostered and nurtured the scientific careers of a large number of physician-scientists who have remained devoted to the mission of performing creative and innovative research that affects the patient care mission of the VA. VA medical research policies have undergone a major overhaul in the past year. Although many of these changes (de-emphasizing bench research and revamping the peer review process) have recently been reversed, the future direction of VA research remains in flux. The goal of this manuscript is to demonstrate the importance of the Merit Review medical research funding mechanism not just to the VA, but to the entire nation's health care system. To achieve this goal, the opinions of 65 established VA medical investigators were obtained regarding the past success and future direction of VA research. The conclusions reached include the following. 1) Merit Review research funding has been essential to the training, recruitment, and retention of productive VA physician-scientists. 2) The VA research program has contributed both basic and clinical innovations that have led to improvements in medical care. Contributions of VA researchers to excellence in many aspects of patient care at VA hospitals have been extraordinary. 3) Development of initiatives that entice outstanding Ph.D.'s to develop their careers in the VA has been crucial to the success of the program. 4) The VA research program has fostered a mutually beneficial relationship with affiliated medical schools. 5) Better methods to quantify VA research contributions and outcomes are essential for future program development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1481-1486
Number of pages6
JournalFASEB Journal
Volume18
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

veterans
Endangered Species
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
biomedical research
Veterans
physicians
endangered species
Biomedical Research
Physicians
Research
patient care
research programs
Patient Care
Health care
research support
peers
funding
Research Peer Review
Research Personnel
Veterans Hospitals

Keywords

  • Basic research
  • Patient care
  • VA training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Veterans Administration support for medical research : Opinions of the endangered species of physician-scientists. / Zucker, Stanley; Crabbe, John Jr; Cooper IV, George; Finkelman, Fred; Largman, Corey; Mccarley, Robert W.; Rice, Louis; Rubin, Janet; Richardson, Bruce; Seil, Frederick; Snider, Gordon L.; Vandenbark, Arthur.

In: FASEB Journal, Vol. 18, No. 13, 10.2004, p. 1481-1486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zucker, S, Crabbe, JJ, Cooper IV, G, Finkelman, F, Largman, C, Mccarley, RW, Rice, L, Rubin, J, Richardson, B, Seil, F, Snider, GL & Vandenbark, A 2004, 'Veterans Administration support for medical research: Opinions of the endangered species of physician-scientists', FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 1481-1486. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1573lfe
Zucker, Stanley ; Crabbe, John Jr ; Cooper IV, George ; Finkelman, Fred ; Largman, Corey ; Mccarley, Robert W. ; Rice, Louis ; Rubin, Janet ; Richardson, Bruce ; Seil, Frederick ; Snider, Gordon L. ; Vandenbark, Arthur. / Veterans Administration support for medical research : Opinions of the endangered species of physician-scientists. In: FASEB Journal. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 13. pp. 1481-1486.
@article{2b27cf81d7084f6f8fc06768f06d0904,
title = "Veterans Administration support for medical research: Opinions of the endangered species of physician-scientists",
abstract = "Over the past three decades the Veterans Affairs (VA) Research program has evolved into a powerful, peer-reviewed funding mechanism for basic and transnational research that has resulted in numerous important contributions to medical science and improvements in patient care. Continuity in VA Merit Review funding has fostered and nurtured the scientific careers of a large number of physician-scientists who have remained devoted to the mission of performing creative and innovative research that affects the patient care mission of the VA. VA medical research policies have undergone a major overhaul in the past year. Although many of these changes (de-emphasizing bench research and revamping the peer review process) have recently been reversed, the future direction of VA research remains in flux. The goal of this manuscript is to demonstrate the importance of the Merit Review medical research funding mechanism not just to the VA, but to the entire nation's health care system. To achieve this goal, the opinions of 65 established VA medical investigators were obtained regarding the past success and future direction of VA research. The conclusions reached include the following. 1) Merit Review research funding has been essential to the training, recruitment, and retention of productive VA physician-scientists. 2) The VA research program has contributed both basic and clinical innovations that have led to improvements in medical care. Contributions of VA researchers to excellence in many aspects of patient care at VA hospitals have been extraordinary. 3) Development of initiatives that entice outstanding Ph.D.'s to develop their careers in the VA has been crucial to the success of the program. 4) The VA research program has fostered a mutually beneficial relationship with affiliated medical schools. 5) Better methods to quantify VA research contributions and outcomes are essential for future program development.",
keywords = "Basic research, Patient care, VA training",
author = "Stanley Zucker and Crabbe, {John Jr} and {Cooper IV}, George and Fred Finkelman and Corey Largman and Mccarley, {Robert W.} and Louis Rice and Janet Rubin and Bruce Richardson and Frederick Seil and Snider, {Gordon L.} and Arthur Vandenbark",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1096/fj.04-1573lfe",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1481--1486",
journal = "FASEB Journal",
issn = "0892-6638",
publisher = "FASEB",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Veterans Administration support for medical research

T2 - Opinions of the endangered species of physician-scientists

AU - Zucker, Stanley

AU - Crabbe, John Jr

AU - Cooper IV, George

AU - Finkelman, Fred

AU - Largman, Corey

AU - Mccarley, Robert W.

AU - Rice, Louis

AU - Rubin, Janet

AU - Richardson, Bruce

AU - Seil, Frederick

AU - Snider, Gordon L.

AU - Vandenbark, Arthur

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - Over the past three decades the Veterans Affairs (VA) Research program has evolved into a powerful, peer-reviewed funding mechanism for basic and transnational research that has resulted in numerous important contributions to medical science and improvements in patient care. Continuity in VA Merit Review funding has fostered and nurtured the scientific careers of a large number of physician-scientists who have remained devoted to the mission of performing creative and innovative research that affects the patient care mission of the VA. VA medical research policies have undergone a major overhaul in the past year. Although many of these changes (de-emphasizing bench research and revamping the peer review process) have recently been reversed, the future direction of VA research remains in flux. The goal of this manuscript is to demonstrate the importance of the Merit Review medical research funding mechanism not just to the VA, but to the entire nation's health care system. To achieve this goal, the opinions of 65 established VA medical investigators were obtained regarding the past success and future direction of VA research. The conclusions reached include the following. 1) Merit Review research funding has been essential to the training, recruitment, and retention of productive VA physician-scientists. 2) The VA research program has contributed both basic and clinical innovations that have led to improvements in medical care. Contributions of VA researchers to excellence in many aspects of patient care at VA hospitals have been extraordinary. 3) Development of initiatives that entice outstanding Ph.D.'s to develop their careers in the VA has been crucial to the success of the program. 4) The VA research program has fostered a mutually beneficial relationship with affiliated medical schools. 5) Better methods to quantify VA research contributions and outcomes are essential for future program development.

AB - Over the past three decades the Veterans Affairs (VA) Research program has evolved into a powerful, peer-reviewed funding mechanism for basic and transnational research that has resulted in numerous important contributions to medical science and improvements in patient care. Continuity in VA Merit Review funding has fostered and nurtured the scientific careers of a large number of physician-scientists who have remained devoted to the mission of performing creative and innovative research that affects the patient care mission of the VA. VA medical research policies have undergone a major overhaul in the past year. Although many of these changes (de-emphasizing bench research and revamping the peer review process) have recently been reversed, the future direction of VA research remains in flux. The goal of this manuscript is to demonstrate the importance of the Merit Review medical research funding mechanism not just to the VA, but to the entire nation's health care system. To achieve this goal, the opinions of 65 established VA medical investigators were obtained regarding the past success and future direction of VA research. The conclusions reached include the following. 1) Merit Review research funding has been essential to the training, recruitment, and retention of productive VA physician-scientists. 2) The VA research program has contributed both basic and clinical innovations that have led to improvements in medical care. Contributions of VA researchers to excellence in many aspects of patient care at VA hospitals have been extraordinary. 3) Development of initiatives that entice outstanding Ph.D.'s to develop their careers in the VA has been crucial to the success of the program. 4) The VA research program has fostered a mutually beneficial relationship with affiliated medical schools. 5) Better methods to quantify VA research contributions and outcomes are essential for future program development.

KW - Basic research

KW - Patient care

KW - VA training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5044223160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5044223160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1096/fj.04-1573lfe

DO - 10.1096/fj.04-1573lfe

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1481

EP - 1486

JO - FASEB Journal

JF - FASEB Journal

SN - 0892-6638

IS - 13

ER -