Varieties of centralized intake: The portland target cities project experience

Nancy Barron, Bentson McFarland, Lynn McCamant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the possible influence of centralized intake on client outcomes, initial, six- and twelve-month Addiction Severity Index composite scores (in the alcohol, drug, legal and psychiatric areas) for clients who experienced provider intake were compared with scores for those going through two different models of centralized intake. Centralized intake clients were more likely than provider intake clients to have legal problems, and those legal problems became fewer over time. Clients from in-jail intake, including pretreatment services and accompanied placement, showed a greater initial and lower subsequent prevalence of drug, psychiatric and legal problems than the clients of the freestanding centralized intake. For all clients, psychiatric composite scores were powerful predictors of problems in alcohol, drug medical and legal areas, and psychiatric symptoms decreased over time. Since baseline differences in demographics and service assignment existed among the three groups, it was difficult to identify whether the outcome differences were due to the nature of the participants, the nature of the intake intervention, or both. However, the Portland Target Cities Projects's emphasis on in-jail centralized intake was associated with enhanced client outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-86
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychoactive Drugs
Volume34
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Alcohols
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Demography

Keywords

  • Addiction Severity Index composite scores
  • Case mix
  • Centralized intake
  • Client outcome
  • In-jail substance abuse treatment
  • Target Cities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Varieties of centralized intake : The portland target cities project experience. / Barron, Nancy; McFarland, Bentson; McCamant, Lynn.

In: Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, p. 75-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barron, N, McFarland, B & McCamant, L 2002, 'Varieties of centralized intake: The portland target cities project experience', Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 75-86.
Barron, Nancy ; McFarland, Bentson ; McCamant, Lynn. / Varieties of centralized intake : The portland target cities project experience. In: Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2002 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 75-86.
@article{71b61f8bdfa542be8e9b8e08b46b5b5b,
title = "Varieties of centralized intake: The portland target cities project experience",
abstract = "To assess the possible influence of centralized intake on client outcomes, initial, six- and twelve-month Addiction Severity Index composite scores (in the alcohol, drug, legal and psychiatric areas) for clients who experienced provider intake were compared with scores for those going through two different models of centralized intake. Centralized intake clients were more likely than provider intake clients to have legal problems, and those legal problems became fewer over time. Clients from in-jail intake, including pretreatment services and accompanied placement, showed a greater initial and lower subsequent prevalence of drug, psychiatric and legal problems than the clients of the freestanding centralized intake. For all clients, psychiatric composite scores were powerful predictors of problems in alcohol, drug medical and legal areas, and psychiatric symptoms decreased over time. Since baseline differences in demographics and service assignment existed among the three groups, it was difficult to identify whether the outcome differences were due to the nature of the participants, the nature of the intake intervention, or both. However, the Portland Target Cities Projects's emphasis on in-jail centralized intake was associated with enhanced client outcomes.",
keywords = "Addiction Severity Index composite scores, Case mix, Centralized intake, Client outcome, In-jail substance abuse treatment, Target Cities",
author = "Nancy Barron and Bentson McFarland and Lynn McCamant",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "75--86",
journal = "Journal of Psychoactive Drugs",
issn = "0279-1072",
publisher = "Haight-Ashbury Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Varieties of centralized intake

T2 - The portland target cities project experience

AU - Barron, Nancy

AU - McFarland, Bentson

AU - McCamant, Lynn

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - To assess the possible influence of centralized intake on client outcomes, initial, six- and twelve-month Addiction Severity Index composite scores (in the alcohol, drug, legal and psychiatric areas) for clients who experienced provider intake were compared with scores for those going through two different models of centralized intake. Centralized intake clients were more likely than provider intake clients to have legal problems, and those legal problems became fewer over time. Clients from in-jail intake, including pretreatment services and accompanied placement, showed a greater initial and lower subsequent prevalence of drug, psychiatric and legal problems than the clients of the freestanding centralized intake. For all clients, psychiatric composite scores were powerful predictors of problems in alcohol, drug medical and legal areas, and psychiatric symptoms decreased over time. Since baseline differences in demographics and service assignment existed among the three groups, it was difficult to identify whether the outcome differences were due to the nature of the participants, the nature of the intake intervention, or both. However, the Portland Target Cities Projects's emphasis on in-jail centralized intake was associated with enhanced client outcomes.

AB - To assess the possible influence of centralized intake on client outcomes, initial, six- and twelve-month Addiction Severity Index composite scores (in the alcohol, drug, legal and psychiatric areas) for clients who experienced provider intake were compared with scores for those going through two different models of centralized intake. Centralized intake clients were more likely than provider intake clients to have legal problems, and those legal problems became fewer over time. Clients from in-jail intake, including pretreatment services and accompanied placement, showed a greater initial and lower subsequent prevalence of drug, psychiatric and legal problems than the clients of the freestanding centralized intake. For all clients, psychiatric composite scores were powerful predictors of problems in alcohol, drug medical and legal areas, and psychiatric symptoms decreased over time. Since baseline differences in demographics and service assignment existed among the three groups, it was difficult to identify whether the outcome differences were due to the nature of the participants, the nature of the intake intervention, or both. However, the Portland Target Cities Projects's emphasis on in-jail centralized intake was associated with enhanced client outcomes.

KW - Addiction Severity Index composite scores

KW - Case mix

KW - Centralized intake

KW - Client outcome

KW - In-jail substance abuse treatment

KW - Target Cities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036221067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036221067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12003117

AN - SCOPUS:0036221067

VL - 34

SP - 75

EP - 86

JO - Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

JF - Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

SN - 0279-1072

IS - 1

ER -