Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State

Jeffrey G. Jarvik, William D. Robertson, Frank Wessbecher, Kenneth Reger, Cam Solomon, Richard Whitten, Thomas Lumley, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) images as a function of type of ownership of the imaging center, number of studies performed per month, specially training of the image interpreter, and field strength of the MR unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from all imaging facilities in western Washington state that received reimbursement from the Washington State Health Care Authority. Three readers with expertise in spine imaging, who were blinded to center and patient identification information, rated the technical image quality of each study. All MR images of the lumbar spine (maximum of six) paid for by the health care authority were evaluated. If a center had performed more than six studies, then six were randomly selected for evaluation. RESULTS: Variation in quality scores among sites was significant (P = .001). Field strength was the strongest predictor of better quality. Poorer quality was associated with for-profit ownership, a larger number of radiologists at the site reading MR images, and a larger percentage of studies checked by a radiologist prior to the end of the examination. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in the quality of MR images of the lumbar spine, and at least a portion of this variation was attributable to characteristics of the imaging center.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-490
Number of pages8
JournalRadiology
Volume215
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spine
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Ownership
Delivery of Health Care
Reading
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance (MR), quality assurance
  • Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues
  • Spin, MR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Jarvik, J. G., Robertson, W. D., Wessbecher, F., Reger, K., Solomon, C., Whitten, R., ... Deyo, R. R. (2000). Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State. Radiology, 215(2), 483-490.

Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State. / Jarvik, Jeffrey G.; Robertson, William D.; Wessbecher, Frank; Reger, Kenneth; Solomon, Cam; Whitten, Richard; Lumley, Thomas; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Radiology, Vol. 215, No. 2, 2000, p. 483-490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jarvik, JG, Robertson, WD, Wessbecher, F, Reger, K, Solomon, C, Whitten, R, Lumley, T & Deyo, RR 2000, 'Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State', Radiology, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 483-490.
Jarvik JG, Robertson WD, Wessbecher F, Reger K, Solomon C, Whitten R et al. Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State. Radiology. 2000;215(2):483-490.
Jarvik, Jeffrey G. ; Robertson, William D. ; Wessbecher, Frank ; Reger, Kenneth ; Solomon, Cam ; Whitten, Richard ; Lumley, Thomas ; Deyo, Richard (Rick). / Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State. In: Radiology. 2000 ; Vol. 215, No. 2. pp. 483-490.
@article{029c05682f9f4e67bae9a4d4ccf944d5,
title = "Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) images as a function of type of ownership of the imaging center, number of studies performed per month, specially training of the image interpreter, and field strength of the MR unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from all imaging facilities in western Washington state that received reimbursement from the Washington State Health Care Authority. Three readers with expertise in spine imaging, who were blinded to center and patient identification information, rated the technical image quality of each study. All MR images of the lumbar spine (maximum of six) paid for by the health care authority were evaluated. If a center had performed more than six studies, then six were randomly selected for evaluation. RESULTS: Variation in quality scores among sites was significant (P = .001). Field strength was the strongest predictor of better quality. Poorer quality was associated with for-profit ownership, a larger number of radiologists at the site reading MR images, and a larger percentage of studies checked by a radiologist prior to the end of the examination. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in the quality of MR images of the lumbar spine, and at least a portion of this variation was attributable to characteristics of the imaging center.",
keywords = "Magnetic resonance (MR), quality assurance, Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues, Spin, MR",
author = "Jarvik, {Jeffrey G.} and Robertson, {William D.} and Frank Wessbecher and Kenneth Reger and Cam Solomon and Richard Whitten and Thomas Lumley and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "215",
pages = "483--490",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in the quality of lumbar spine MR images in Washington State

AU - Jarvik, Jeffrey G.

AU - Robertson, William D.

AU - Wessbecher, Frank

AU - Reger, Kenneth

AU - Solomon, Cam

AU - Whitten, Richard

AU - Lumley, Thomas

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) images as a function of type of ownership of the imaging center, number of studies performed per month, specially training of the image interpreter, and field strength of the MR unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from all imaging facilities in western Washington state that received reimbursement from the Washington State Health Care Authority. Three readers with expertise in spine imaging, who were blinded to center and patient identification information, rated the technical image quality of each study. All MR images of the lumbar spine (maximum of six) paid for by the health care authority were evaluated. If a center had performed more than six studies, then six were randomly selected for evaluation. RESULTS: Variation in quality scores among sites was significant (P = .001). Field strength was the strongest predictor of better quality. Poorer quality was associated with for-profit ownership, a larger number of radiologists at the site reading MR images, and a larger percentage of studies checked by a radiologist prior to the end of the examination. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in the quality of MR images of the lumbar spine, and at least a portion of this variation was attributable to characteristics of the imaging center.

AB - PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) images as a function of type of ownership of the imaging center, number of studies performed per month, specially training of the image interpreter, and field strength of the MR unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from all imaging facilities in western Washington state that received reimbursement from the Washington State Health Care Authority. Three readers with expertise in spine imaging, who were blinded to center and patient identification information, rated the technical image quality of each study. All MR images of the lumbar spine (maximum of six) paid for by the health care authority were evaluated. If a center had performed more than six studies, then six were randomly selected for evaluation. RESULTS: Variation in quality scores among sites was significant (P = .001). Field strength was the strongest predictor of better quality. Poorer quality was associated with for-profit ownership, a larger number of radiologists at the site reading MR images, and a larger percentage of studies checked by a radiologist prior to the end of the examination. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in the quality of MR images of the lumbar spine, and at least a portion of this variation was attributable to characteristics of the imaging center.

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), quality assurance

KW - Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues

KW - Spin, MR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033997109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033997109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10796929

AN - SCOPUS:0033997109

VL - 215

SP - 483

EP - 490

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -