Variables predicting trauma patient survival following massive transfusion

Laura M. Criddle, Deborah Eldredge, Jeffery Walker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Introduction: The literature contains little information regarding demographic or transfusion-related factors associated with survival following massive blood transfusion in trauma patients. The objective of this study was to describe patient, transfusion, and laboratory variables contributing to survival in this population during the first and second days after arrival at the hospital. A secondary objective was to identify costs associated with massive blood transfusion. Methods: A 7-year, retrospective review of 13,005 consecutive trauma patient records yielded a sample of 46 who were transfused with ≥50 units of blood products in the first postinjury day. Descriptive statistics were computed to describe the sample, transfusion data, and laboratory values. Logistic regression was used to predict survival using selected patient characteristics, laboratory data, and transfusion characteristics for both the first and second days. Results: Overall survival among this group who received massive transfusion was 63%. No significant differences were found between survivors and nonsurvivors in age, sex, type of trauma, or amount of any of the blood components administered on Day 1. Nonsurvivors had higher Injury Severity Scores and shorter ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Controlling for other variables, only arterial base deficit levels made a significant unique contribution to predicting survival. The volume of blood transfused on Day 2 did not contribute to survival prediction. The average cost of blood transfusion was more than $49,000 per survivor and $51,000 per nonsurvivor. Conclusion: Defining medical futility based solely on the volume of blood products transfused currently is unjustified. The search for other early indicators of survival in the trauma population must continue.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)236-242
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Emergency Nursing
    Volume31
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2005

    Fingerprint

    Survival
    Wounds and Injuries
    Blood Transfusion
    Blood Volume
    Survivors
    Length of Stay
    Medical Futility
    Costs and Cost Analysis
    Injury Severity Score
    Population
    Logistic Models
    Demography

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nursing(all)

    Cite this

    Variables predicting trauma patient survival following massive transfusion. / Criddle, Laura M.; Eldredge, Deborah; Walker, Jeffery.

    In: Journal of Emergency Nursing, Vol. 31, No. 3, 06.2005, p. 236-242.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Criddle, Laura M. ; Eldredge, Deborah ; Walker, Jeffery. / Variables predicting trauma patient survival following massive transfusion. In: Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2005 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 236-242.
    @article{0b93c782ad3e4f21a390667a23dbc12d,
    title = "Variables predicting trauma patient survival following massive transfusion",
    abstract = "Introduction: The literature contains little information regarding demographic or transfusion-related factors associated with survival following massive blood transfusion in trauma patients. The objective of this study was to describe patient, transfusion, and laboratory variables contributing to survival in this population during the first and second days after arrival at the hospital. A secondary objective was to identify costs associated with massive blood transfusion. Methods: A 7-year, retrospective review of 13,005 consecutive trauma patient records yielded a sample of 46 who were transfused with ≥50 units of blood products in the first postinjury day. Descriptive statistics were computed to describe the sample, transfusion data, and laboratory values. Logistic regression was used to predict survival using selected patient characteristics, laboratory data, and transfusion characteristics for both the first and second days. Results: Overall survival among this group who received massive transfusion was 63{\%}. No significant differences were found between survivors and nonsurvivors in age, sex, type of trauma, or amount of any of the blood components administered on Day 1. Nonsurvivors had higher Injury Severity Scores and shorter ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Controlling for other variables, only arterial base deficit levels made a significant unique contribution to predicting survival. The volume of blood transfused on Day 2 did not contribute to survival prediction. The average cost of blood transfusion was more than $49,000 per survivor and $51,000 per nonsurvivor. Conclusion: Defining medical futility based solely on the volume of blood products transfused currently is unjustified. The search for other early indicators of survival in the trauma population must continue.",
    author = "Criddle, {Laura M.} and Deborah Eldredge and Jeffery Walker",
    year = "2005",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jen.2005.03.004",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "236--242",
    journal = "Journal of Emergency Nursing",
    issn = "0099-1767",
    publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Variables predicting trauma patient survival following massive transfusion

    AU - Criddle, Laura M.

    AU - Eldredge, Deborah

    AU - Walker, Jeffery

    PY - 2005/6

    Y1 - 2005/6

    N2 - Introduction: The literature contains little information regarding demographic or transfusion-related factors associated with survival following massive blood transfusion in trauma patients. The objective of this study was to describe patient, transfusion, and laboratory variables contributing to survival in this population during the first and second days after arrival at the hospital. A secondary objective was to identify costs associated with massive blood transfusion. Methods: A 7-year, retrospective review of 13,005 consecutive trauma patient records yielded a sample of 46 who were transfused with ≥50 units of blood products in the first postinjury day. Descriptive statistics were computed to describe the sample, transfusion data, and laboratory values. Logistic regression was used to predict survival using selected patient characteristics, laboratory data, and transfusion characteristics for both the first and second days. Results: Overall survival among this group who received massive transfusion was 63%. No significant differences were found between survivors and nonsurvivors in age, sex, type of trauma, or amount of any of the blood components administered on Day 1. Nonsurvivors had higher Injury Severity Scores and shorter ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Controlling for other variables, only arterial base deficit levels made a significant unique contribution to predicting survival. The volume of blood transfused on Day 2 did not contribute to survival prediction. The average cost of blood transfusion was more than $49,000 per survivor and $51,000 per nonsurvivor. Conclusion: Defining medical futility based solely on the volume of blood products transfused currently is unjustified. The search for other early indicators of survival in the trauma population must continue.

    AB - Introduction: The literature contains little information regarding demographic or transfusion-related factors associated with survival following massive blood transfusion in trauma patients. The objective of this study was to describe patient, transfusion, and laboratory variables contributing to survival in this population during the first and second days after arrival at the hospital. A secondary objective was to identify costs associated with massive blood transfusion. Methods: A 7-year, retrospective review of 13,005 consecutive trauma patient records yielded a sample of 46 who were transfused with ≥50 units of blood products in the first postinjury day. Descriptive statistics were computed to describe the sample, transfusion data, and laboratory values. Logistic regression was used to predict survival using selected patient characteristics, laboratory data, and transfusion characteristics for both the first and second days. Results: Overall survival among this group who received massive transfusion was 63%. No significant differences were found between survivors and nonsurvivors in age, sex, type of trauma, or amount of any of the blood components administered on Day 1. Nonsurvivors had higher Injury Severity Scores and shorter ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Controlling for other variables, only arterial base deficit levels made a significant unique contribution to predicting survival. The volume of blood transfused on Day 2 did not contribute to survival prediction. The average cost of blood transfusion was more than $49,000 per survivor and $51,000 per nonsurvivor. Conclusion: Defining medical futility based solely on the volume of blood products transfused currently is unjustified. The search for other early indicators of survival in the trauma population must continue.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20844463663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20844463663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jen.2005.03.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.jen.2005.03.004

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 15983575

    AN - SCOPUS:20844463663

    VL - 31

    SP - 236

    EP - 242

    JO - Journal of Emergency Nursing

    JF - Journal of Emergency Nursing

    SN - 0099-1767

    IS - 3

    ER -