Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: Assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes

Emmanuelle Pare, Joanne N. Quiñones, George A. Macones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the maternal implications of strategies of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) attempt versus elective repeat caesarean section in women with one previous lower segment caesarean section. Design: Decision model. Population: Women with one prior low transverse caesarean section who are eligible for trial of labour. Methods: Two decision models were built: the first one applying to women planning only one more pregnancy, the second one applying to women planning two more pregnancies. Probability estimates for VBAC success rate and risks of uterine rupture, placenta praevia, placenta accreta and hysterectomy were extracted from the available literature. Main outcome measures: Hysterectomy for uterine rupture, placenta accreta or other indications. Results: In the first model VBAC attempt led to a higher hysterectomy rate (267/100,000) compared with repeat caesarean section (187/100,000). However, in the second model a policy of elective repeat caesarean section led to higher cumulative hysterectomy rate: 1465/100,000 versus 907/100,000 for VBAC. The first model was robust to all but one variable in sensitivity analyses. The second model was robust to all variables in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: These results indicate that long term reproductive consequences of multiple caesarean sections should be considered when making policy decisions regarding the risk-benefit ratio of VBAC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-85
Number of pages11
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Repeat Cesarean Section
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Cesarean Section
Hysterectomy
Placenta Accreta
Uterine Rupture
Trial of Labor
Placenta Previa
Pregnancy
Maternal Health
Policy Making
Decision Making
Odds Ratio
Mothers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section : Assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. / Pare, Emmanuelle; Quiñones, Joanne N.; Macones, George A.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 113, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 75-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3cc55578a0e41f6967c77836aa62639,
title = "Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: Assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the maternal implications of strategies of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) attempt versus elective repeat caesarean section in women with one previous lower segment caesarean section. Design: Decision model. Population: Women with one prior low transverse caesarean section who are eligible for trial of labour. Methods: Two decision models were built: the first one applying to women planning only one more pregnancy, the second one applying to women planning two more pregnancies. Probability estimates for VBAC success rate and risks of uterine rupture, placenta praevia, placenta accreta and hysterectomy were extracted from the available literature. Main outcome measures: Hysterectomy for uterine rupture, placenta accreta or other indications. Results: In the first model VBAC attempt led to a higher hysterectomy rate (267/100,000) compared with repeat caesarean section (187/100,000). However, in the second model a policy of elective repeat caesarean section led to higher cumulative hysterectomy rate: 1465/100,000 versus 907/100,000 for VBAC. The first model was robust to all but one variable in sensitivity analyses. The second model was robust to all variables in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: These results indicate that long term reproductive consequences of multiple caesarean sections should be considered when making policy decisions regarding the risk-benefit ratio of VBAC.",
author = "Emmanuelle Pare and Qui{\~n}ones, {Joanne N.} and Macones, {George A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00793.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "75--85",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section

T2 - Assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes

AU - Pare, Emmanuelle

AU - Quiñones, Joanne N.

AU - Macones, George A.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the maternal implications of strategies of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) attempt versus elective repeat caesarean section in women with one previous lower segment caesarean section. Design: Decision model. Population: Women with one prior low transverse caesarean section who are eligible for trial of labour. Methods: Two decision models were built: the first one applying to women planning only one more pregnancy, the second one applying to women planning two more pregnancies. Probability estimates for VBAC success rate and risks of uterine rupture, placenta praevia, placenta accreta and hysterectomy were extracted from the available literature. Main outcome measures: Hysterectomy for uterine rupture, placenta accreta or other indications. Results: In the first model VBAC attempt led to a higher hysterectomy rate (267/100,000) compared with repeat caesarean section (187/100,000). However, in the second model a policy of elective repeat caesarean section led to higher cumulative hysterectomy rate: 1465/100,000 versus 907/100,000 for VBAC. The first model was robust to all but one variable in sensitivity analyses. The second model was robust to all variables in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: These results indicate that long term reproductive consequences of multiple caesarean sections should be considered when making policy decisions regarding the risk-benefit ratio of VBAC.

AB - Objective: To compare the maternal implications of strategies of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) attempt versus elective repeat caesarean section in women with one previous lower segment caesarean section. Design: Decision model. Population: Women with one prior low transverse caesarean section who are eligible for trial of labour. Methods: Two decision models were built: the first one applying to women planning only one more pregnancy, the second one applying to women planning two more pregnancies. Probability estimates for VBAC success rate and risks of uterine rupture, placenta praevia, placenta accreta and hysterectomy were extracted from the available literature. Main outcome measures: Hysterectomy for uterine rupture, placenta accreta or other indications. Results: In the first model VBAC attempt led to a higher hysterectomy rate (267/100,000) compared with repeat caesarean section (187/100,000). However, in the second model a policy of elective repeat caesarean section led to higher cumulative hysterectomy rate: 1465/100,000 versus 907/100,000 for VBAC. The first model was robust to all but one variable in sensitivity analyses. The second model was robust to all variables in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: These results indicate that long term reproductive consequences of multiple caesarean sections should be considered when making policy decisions regarding the risk-benefit ratio of VBAC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644814756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644814756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00793.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00793.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16398775

AN - SCOPUS:33644814756

VL - 113

SP - 75

EP - 85

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 1

ER -