Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews

Evelyn P. Whitlock, Jennifer S. Lin, Roger Chou, Paul Shekelle, Karen A. Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systematic reviewers increasingly must decide whether and how to incorporate existing systematic reviews into complex systematic reviews that are commissioned to support clinical guideline development or for other health policy uses. To date, however, this issue has been largely unexamined. Reviewers seeking to incorporate existing reviews into new reviews face a set of important questions: Can this practice adhere to systematic review principles? Will it save time? When should it be avoided? Will it produce valid results and be acceptable to users? Drawing from their collective experience, the authors outline a series of steps that can help reviewers reach reasoned decisions about the incorporation of existing systematic reviews and enumerate potential hazards to consider in doing so. They highlight issues surrounding the main steps reviewers must undertake, including locating existing reviews; assessing their relevance to the new review; assessing the quality of relevant reviews; determining how to incorporate high-quality, relevant existing systematic reviews; and clearly reporting the methods used and the results from this process. Further specification of methods, including the development of reporting standards for this approach, is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)776-782
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume148
Issue number10
StatePublished - May 20 2008

Fingerprint

Health Policy
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Chou, R., Shekelle, P., & Robinson, K. A. (2008). Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(10), 776-782.

Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. / Whitlock, Evelyn P.; Lin, Jennifer S.; Chou, Roger; Shekelle, Paul; Robinson, Karen A.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 148, No. 10, 20.05.2008, p. 776-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whitlock, EP, Lin, JS, Chou, R, Shekelle, P & Robinson, KA 2008, 'Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews', Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 148, no. 10, pp. 776-782.
Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Chou R, Shekelle P, Robinson KA. Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008 May 20;148(10):776-782.
Whitlock, Evelyn P. ; Lin, Jennifer S. ; Chou, Roger ; Shekelle, Paul ; Robinson, Karen A. / Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 148, No. 10. pp. 776-782.
@article{6f45f1cfe09c4f12a442fce1257370da,
title = "Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews",
abstract = "Systematic reviewers increasingly must decide whether and how to incorporate existing systematic reviews into complex systematic reviews that are commissioned to support clinical guideline development or for other health policy uses. To date, however, this issue has been largely unexamined. Reviewers seeking to incorporate existing reviews into new reviews face a set of important questions: Can this practice adhere to systematic review principles? Will it save time? When should it be avoided? Will it produce valid results and be acceptable to users? Drawing from their collective experience, the authors outline a series of steps that can help reviewers reach reasoned decisions about the incorporation of existing systematic reviews and enumerate potential hazards to consider in doing so. They highlight issues surrounding the main steps reviewers must undertake, including locating existing reviews; assessing their relevance to the new review; assessing the quality of relevant reviews; determining how to incorporate high-quality, relevant existing systematic reviews; and clearly reporting the methods used and the results from this process. Further specification of methods, including the development of reporting standards for this approach, is needed.",
author = "Whitlock, {Evelyn P.} and Lin, {Jennifer S.} and Roger Chou and Paul Shekelle and Robinson, {Karen A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "20",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "776--782",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews

AU - Whitlock, Evelyn P.

AU - Lin, Jennifer S.

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Shekelle, Paul

AU - Robinson, Karen A.

PY - 2008/5/20

Y1 - 2008/5/20

N2 - Systematic reviewers increasingly must decide whether and how to incorporate existing systematic reviews into complex systematic reviews that are commissioned to support clinical guideline development or for other health policy uses. To date, however, this issue has been largely unexamined. Reviewers seeking to incorporate existing reviews into new reviews face a set of important questions: Can this practice adhere to systematic review principles? Will it save time? When should it be avoided? Will it produce valid results and be acceptable to users? Drawing from their collective experience, the authors outline a series of steps that can help reviewers reach reasoned decisions about the incorporation of existing systematic reviews and enumerate potential hazards to consider in doing so. They highlight issues surrounding the main steps reviewers must undertake, including locating existing reviews; assessing their relevance to the new review; assessing the quality of relevant reviews; determining how to incorporate high-quality, relevant existing systematic reviews; and clearly reporting the methods used and the results from this process. Further specification of methods, including the development of reporting standards for this approach, is needed.

AB - Systematic reviewers increasingly must decide whether and how to incorporate existing systematic reviews into complex systematic reviews that are commissioned to support clinical guideline development or for other health policy uses. To date, however, this issue has been largely unexamined. Reviewers seeking to incorporate existing reviews into new reviews face a set of important questions: Can this practice adhere to systematic review principles? Will it save time? When should it be avoided? Will it produce valid results and be acceptable to users? Drawing from their collective experience, the authors outline a series of steps that can help reviewers reach reasoned decisions about the incorporation of existing systematic reviews and enumerate potential hazards to consider in doing so. They highlight issues surrounding the main steps reviewers must undertake, including locating existing reviews; assessing their relevance to the new review; assessing the quality of relevant reviews; determining how to incorporate high-quality, relevant existing systematic reviews; and clearly reporting the methods used and the results from this process. Further specification of methods, including the development of reporting standards for this approach, is needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44149084973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44149084973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18490690

AN - SCOPUS:44149084973

VL - 148

SP - 776

EP - 782

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 10

ER -