Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope

D. A. Shumaker, Atif Zaman, Ronald Katon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aims: Experts fail to reach the cecum in 2-10% of colonoscopies. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the efficacy of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The variable-stiffness colonoscope (Olympus America XPCF-140AL) was used by the same examiner to reattempt colonoscopy immediately in all patients in whom colonoscopy to the cecum with the standard colonoscope was incomplete. Results: Sixteen of 385 attempted colonoscopies (4.2%) did not reach the cecum with the standard colonoscope due to looping (n = 12), fixed angulation of the sigmoid colon (n = 3), and diverticulosis (n = 1). The procedures were deemed a failure after a mean of 28 min, despite the use of abdominal pressure and positional change in all patients. Fifteen of the 16 patients (94%) had a complete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope. One patient had an incomplete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope due to an obstructing mass in the transverse colon that was not reached by the standard colonoscope. With the variable-stiffness colonoscope, the mean time to cecal intubation was 10.3 min; four patients (25%) required a change in patient position, and six patients (37.5%) required abdominal pressure. Conclusions: A variable-stiffness colonoscope allowed completion of colonoscopy in all patients without obstruction who had an incomplete colonoscopy with the standard colonoscope. Further study is needed to determine whether the variable-stiffness colonoscope should be used routinely for colonoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)711-714
Number of pages4
JournalEndoscopy
Volume34
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Colonoscopes
Colonoscopy
Cecum
Pressure
Transverse Colon
Diverticulum
Sigmoid Colon
Intubation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope. / Shumaker, D. A.; Zaman, Atif; Katon, Ronald.

In: Endoscopy, Vol. 34, No. 9, 2002, p. 711-714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3369d40101ba47d98dfd8e38565fe1ed,
title = "Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope",
abstract = "Background and study aims: Experts fail to reach the cecum in 2-10{\%} of colonoscopies. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the efficacy of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The variable-stiffness colonoscope (Olympus America XPCF-140AL) was used by the same examiner to reattempt colonoscopy immediately in all patients in whom colonoscopy to the cecum with the standard colonoscope was incomplete. Results: Sixteen of 385 attempted colonoscopies (4.2{\%}) did not reach the cecum with the standard colonoscope due to looping (n = 12), fixed angulation of the sigmoid colon (n = 3), and diverticulosis (n = 1). The procedures were deemed a failure after a mean of 28 min, despite the use of abdominal pressure and positional change in all patients. Fifteen of the 16 patients (94{\%}) had a complete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope. One patient had an incomplete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope due to an obstructing mass in the transverse colon that was not reached by the standard colonoscope. With the variable-stiffness colonoscope, the mean time to cecal intubation was 10.3 min; four patients (25{\%}) required a change in patient position, and six patients (37.5{\%}) required abdominal pressure. Conclusions: A variable-stiffness colonoscope allowed completion of colonoscopy in all patients without obstruction who had an incomplete colonoscopy with the standard colonoscope. Further study is needed to determine whether the variable-stiffness colonoscope should be used routinely for colonoscopy.",
author = "Shumaker, {D. A.} and Atif Zaman and Ronald Katon",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1055/s-2002-33442",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "711--714",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope

AU - Shumaker, D. A.

AU - Zaman, Atif

AU - Katon, Ronald

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background and study aims: Experts fail to reach the cecum in 2-10% of colonoscopies. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the efficacy of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The variable-stiffness colonoscope (Olympus America XPCF-140AL) was used by the same examiner to reattempt colonoscopy immediately in all patients in whom colonoscopy to the cecum with the standard colonoscope was incomplete. Results: Sixteen of 385 attempted colonoscopies (4.2%) did not reach the cecum with the standard colonoscope due to looping (n = 12), fixed angulation of the sigmoid colon (n = 3), and diverticulosis (n = 1). The procedures were deemed a failure after a mean of 28 min, despite the use of abdominal pressure and positional change in all patients. Fifteen of the 16 patients (94%) had a complete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope. One patient had an incomplete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope due to an obstructing mass in the transverse colon that was not reached by the standard colonoscope. With the variable-stiffness colonoscope, the mean time to cecal intubation was 10.3 min; four patients (25%) required a change in patient position, and six patients (37.5%) required abdominal pressure. Conclusions: A variable-stiffness colonoscope allowed completion of colonoscopy in all patients without obstruction who had an incomplete colonoscopy with the standard colonoscope. Further study is needed to determine whether the variable-stiffness colonoscope should be used routinely for colonoscopy.

AB - Background and study aims: Experts fail to reach the cecum in 2-10% of colonoscopies. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the efficacy of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Patients and methods: The variable-stiffness colonoscope (Olympus America XPCF-140AL) was used by the same examiner to reattempt colonoscopy immediately in all patients in whom colonoscopy to the cecum with the standard colonoscope was incomplete. Results: Sixteen of 385 attempted colonoscopies (4.2%) did not reach the cecum with the standard colonoscope due to looping (n = 12), fixed angulation of the sigmoid colon (n = 3), and diverticulosis (n = 1). The procedures were deemed a failure after a mean of 28 min, despite the use of abdominal pressure and positional change in all patients. Fifteen of the 16 patients (94%) had a complete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope. One patient had an incomplete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope due to an obstructing mass in the transverse colon that was not reached by the standard colonoscope. With the variable-stiffness colonoscope, the mean time to cecal intubation was 10.3 min; four patients (25%) required a change in patient position, and six patients (37.5%) required abdominal pressure. Conclusions: A variable-stiffness colonoscope allowed completion of colonoscopy in all patients without obstruction who had an incomplete colonoscopy with the standard colonoscope. Further study is needed to determine whether the variable-stiffness colonoscope should be used routinely for colonoscopy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036353572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036353572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2002-33442

DO - 10.1055/s-2002-33442

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 711

EP - 714

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 9

ER -