TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of a Preventive Index to Examine Clinic-Level Factors Associated With Delivery of Preventive Care
AU - Hatch, Brigit A.
AU - Tillotson, Carrie J.
AU - Huguet, Nathalie
AU - Hoopes, Megan J.
AU - Marino, Miguel
AU - DeVoe, Jennifer E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Agency for Health care Research and Quality (grant number R01HS024270 ), the National Cancer Institutes (grant numbers R01CA204267 and R01CA181452 ), and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant number R01HL136575 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Introduction: There is an increasing need for the development of new methods to understand factors affecting delivery of preventive care. This study applies a new measurement approach and assesses clinic-level factors associated with preventive care delivery. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 94 community health centers used electronic health record data from the OCHIN community health information network, 2014–2015. Clinic-level preventive ratios (time covered by a preventive service/time eligible for a preventive service) were calculated in 2017 for 12 preventive services with A or B recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force along with an aggregate preventive index for all services combined. For each service, multivariable negative binomial regression modeling and calculated rate ratios assessed the association between clinic-level variables and delivery of care. Results: Of ambulatory community health center visits, 59.8% were Medicaid-insured and 10.4% were uninsured. Ambulatory community health centers served 16.9% patients who were Hispanic, 13.1% who were nonwhite, and 68.7% who had household incomes <138% of the federal poverty line. Clinic-level preventive ratios ranged from 3% (hepatitis C screening) to 93% (blood pressure screening). The aggregate preventive index including all screening measures was 47% (IQR, 42%–50%). At the clinic level, having a higher percentage of uninsured visits was associated with lower preventive ratios for most (7 of 12) preventive services. Conclusions: Approaches that use individual preventive ratios and aggregate prevention indices are promising for understanding and improving preventive service delivery over time. Health insurance remains strongly associated with access to needed preventive care, even for safety net clinic populations.
AB - Introduction: There is an increasing need for the development of new methods to understand factors affecting delivery of preventive care. This study applies a new measurement approach and assesses clinic-level factors associated with preventive care delivery. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 94 community health centers used electronic health record data from the OCHIN community health information network, 2014–2015. Clinic-level preventive ratios (time covered by a preventive service/time eligible for a preventive service) were calculated in 2017 for 12 preventive services with A or B recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force along with an aggregate preventive index for all services combined. For each service, multivariable negative binomial regression modeling and calculated rate ratios assessed the association between clinic-level variables and delivery of care. Results: Of ambulatory community health center visits, 59.8% were Medicaid-insured and 10.4% were uninsured. Ambulatory community health centers served 16.9% patients who were Hispanic, 13.1% who were nonwhite, and 68.7% who had household incomes <138% of the federal poverty line. Clinic-level preventive ratios ranged from 3% (hepatitis C screening) to 93% (blood pressure screening). The aggregate preventive index including all screening measures was 47% (IQR, 42%–50%). At the clinic level, having a higher percentage of uninsured visits was associated with lower preventive ratios for most (7 of 12) preventive services. Conclusions: Approaches that use individual preventive ratios and aggregate prevention indices are promising for understanding and improving preventive service delivery over time. Health insurance remains strongly associated with access to needed preventive care, even for safety net clinic populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068785207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068785207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.016
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 31326008
AN - SCOPUS:85068785207
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 57
SP - 241
EP - 249
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 2
ER -