Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices

Deborah Cohen, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Melinda Davis, Jennifer Hall, Rose Gunn, Kurt C. Stange, Larry A. Green, William L. Miller, Benjamin F. Crabtree, Mary Jane England, Khaya Clark, Benjamin F. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide empirical evidence on key organizing constructs shaping practical, real-world integration of behavior health and primary care to comprehensively address patients' medical, emotional, and behavioral health needs.

METHODS: In a comparative case study using an immersion-crystallization approach, a multidisciplinary team analyzed data from observations of practice operations, interviews, and surveys of practice members, and implementation diaries. Practices were drawn from 2 studies of practices attempting to integrate behavioral health and primary care: Advancing Care Together, a demonstration project of 11 practices located in Colorado, and the Integration Workforce Study, a study of 8 practices across the United States.

RESULTS: We identified 5 key organizing constructs influencing integration of primary care and behavioral health: 1) Integration REACH (the extent to which the integration program was delivered to the identified target population), 2) establishment of continuum of care pathways addressing the location of care across the range of patient's severity of illness, 3) approach to patient transitions: referrals or warm handoffs, 4) location of the integration workforce, and 5) participants' mental model for integration. These constructs intertwine within an organization's historic and social context to produce locally adapted approaches to integrating care. Contextual factors, particularly practice type, influenced whether specialty mental health and substance use services were colocated within an organization.

CONCLUSION: Interaction among 5 organizing constructs and practice context produces diverse expressions of integrated care. These constructs provide a framework for understanding how primary care and behavioral health services can be integrated in routine practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S7-S20
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Volume28
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Organizations
Patient Transfer
Continuity of Patient Care
Health Services Needs and Demand
Immersion
Crystallization
Health Services
Mental Health
Referral and Consultation
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Integrated
  • Practice-based Research
  • Primary Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up : Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices. / Cohen, Deborah; Balasubramanian, Bijal A.; Davis, Melinda; Hall, Jennifer; Gunn, Rose; Stange, Kurt C.; Green, Larry A.; Miller, William L.; Crabtree, Benjamin F.; England, Mary Jane; Clark, Khaya; Miller, Benjamin F.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, Vol. 28, 01.09.2015, p. S7-S20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, D, Balasubramanian, BA, Davis, M, Hall, J, Gunn, R, Stange, KC, Green, LA, Miller, WL, Crabtree, BF, England, MJ, Clark, K & Miller, BF 2015, 'Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices', Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, vol. 28, pp. S7-S20. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150050
Cohen, Deborah ; Balasubramanian, Bijal A. ; Davis, Melinda ; Hall, Jennifer ; Gunn, Rose ; Stange, Kurt C. ; Green, Larry A. ; Miller, William L. ; Crabtree, Benjamin F. ; England, Mary Jane ; Clark, Khaya ; Miller, Benjamin F. / Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up : Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. 2015 ; Vol. 28. pp. S7-S20.
@article{3344a187f0984d07adf1a9309f7aa5b0,
title = "Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up: Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To provide empirical evidence on key organizing constructs shaping practical, real-world integration of behavior health and primary care to comprehensively address patients' medical, emotional, and behavioral health needs.METHODS: In a comparative case study using an immersion-crystallization approach, a multidisciplinary team analyzed data from observations of practice operations, interviews, and surveys of practice members, and implementation diaries. Practices were drawn from 2 studies of practices attempting to integrate behavioral health and primary care: Advancing Care Together, a demonstration project of 11 practices located in Colorado, and the Integration Workforce Study, a study of 8 practices across the United States.RESULTS: We identified 5 key organizing constructs influencing integration of primary care and behavioral health: 1) Integration REACH (the extent to which the integration program was delivered to the identified target population), 2) establishment of continuum of care pathways addressing the location of care across the range of patient's severity of illness, 3) approach to patient transitions: referrals or warm handoffs, 4) location of the integration workforce, and 5) participants' mental model for integration. These constructs intertwine within an organization's historic and social context to produce locally adapted approaches to integrating care. Contextual factors, particularly practice type, influenced whether specialty mental health and substance use services were colocated within an organization.CONCLUSION: Interaction among 5 organizing constructs and practice context produces diverse expressions of integrated care. These constructs provide a framework for understanding how primary care and behavioral health services can be integrated in routine practice.",
keywords = "Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Practice-based Research, Primary Health Care",
author = "Deborah Cohen and Balasubramanian, {Bijal A.} and Melinda Davis and Jennifer Hall and Rose Gunn and Stange, {Kurt C.} and Green, {Larry A.} and Miller, {William L.} and Crabtree, {Benjamin F.} and England, {Mary Jane} and Khaya Clark and Miller, {Benjamin F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "S7--S20",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Care Integration from the Ground Up

T2 - Five Organizing Constructs that Shape Integrated Practices

AU - Cohen, Deborah

AU - Balasubramanian, Bijal A.

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Hall, Jennifer

AU - Gunn, Rose

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

AU - Green, Larry A.

AU - Miller, William L.

AU - Crabtree, Benjamin F.

AU - England, Mary Jane

AU - Clark, Khaya

AU - Miller, Benjamin F.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To provide empirical evidence on key organizing constructs shaping practical, real-world integration of behavior health and primary care to comprehensively address patients' medical, emotional, and behavioral health needs.METHODS: In a comparative case study using an immersion-crystallization approach, a multidisciplinary team analyzed data from observations of practice operations, interviews, and surveys of practice members, and implementation diaries. Practices were drawn from 2 studies of practices attempting to integrate behavioral health and primary care: Advancing Care Together, a demonstration project of 11 practices located in Colorado, and the Integration Workforce Study, a study of 8 practices across the United States.RESULTS: We identified 5 key organizing constructs influencing integration of primary care and behavioral health: 1) Integration REACH (the extent to which the integration program was delivered to the identified target population), 2) establishment of continuum of care pathways addressing the location of care across the range of patient's severity of illness, 3) approach to patient transitions: referrals or warm handoffs, 4) location of the integration workforce, and 5) participants' mental model for integration. These constructs intertwine within an organization's historic and social context to produce locally adapted approaches to integrating care. Contextual factors, particularly practice type, influenced whether specialty mental health and substance use services were colocated within an organization.CONCLUSION: Interaction among 5 organizing constructs and practice context produces diverse expressions of integrated care. These constructs provide a framework for understanding how primary care and behavioral health services can be integrated in routine practice.

AB - PURPOSE: To provide empirical evidence on key organizing constructs shaping practical, real-world integration of behavior health and primary care to comprehensively address patients' medical, emotional, and behavioral health needs.METHODS: In a comparative case study using an immersion-crystallization approach, a multidisciplinary team analyzed data from observations of practice operations, interviews, and surveys of practice members, and implementation diaries. Practices were drawn from 2 studies of practices attempting to integrate behavioral health and primary care: Advancing Care Together, a demonstration project of 11 practices located in Colorado, and the Integration Workforce Study, a study of 8 practices across the United States.RESULTS: We identified 5 key organizing constructs influencing integration of primary care and behavioral health: 1) Integration REACH (the extent to which the integration program was delivered to the identified target population), 2) establishment of continuum of care pathways addressing the location of care across the range of patient's severity of illness, 3) approach to patient transitions: referrals or warm handoffs, 4) location of the integration workforce, and 5) participants' mental model for integration. These constructs intertwine within an organization's historic and social context to produce locally adapted approaches to integrating care. Contextual factors, particularly practice type, influenced whether specialty mental health and substance use services were colocated within an organization.CONCLUSION: Interaction among 5 organizing constructs and practice context produces diverse expressions of integrated care. These constructs provide a framework for understanding how primary care and behavioral health services can be integrated in routine practice.

KW - Delivery of Health Care

KW - Integrated

KW - Practice-based Research

KW - Primary Health Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949500176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949500176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150050

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150050

M3 - Article

C2 - 26359474

AN - SCOPUS:84949500176

VL - 28

SP - S7-S20

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

ER -