Trauma system impact on admission site

A comparison of two states

N. Clay Mann, Jerris R. Hedges, Ronald Sandoval, William Worrall, Andrew D. Zechnich, Gregory J. Jurkovich, Richard Mullins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To introduce a measure assessing statewide hospital admission patterns for trauma and evaluate its utility in identifying significant admission redistributions in neighboring states as a function of trauma system implementation. Methods: A retrospective claims database analysis was performed of hospitalized trauma patients in Washington and Oregon. The site of hospitalization and diagnostic information were used to determine an admission rate difference for each hospital: the rate of index patient admissions minus the rate of non-index patient admissions. Mean admission rate differences for Level II and III versus other hospitals in each state were compared as a function of time. Results: A bias in favor of admitting more serious injuries to Level II and III hospitals was seen with trauma system implementation in both states, but it was more pronounced in the Oregon trauma system. Conclusion: Assessment of admission rate differences is a helpful method of characterizing the evolution of statewide trauma systems.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)631-637
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
    Volume46
    Issue number4
    StatePublished - Apr 1999

    Fingerprint

    Wounds and Injuries
    Patient Admission
    Insurance Claim Review
    Hospitalization
    Databases

    Keywords

    • Health care delivery
    • Hospital admission
    • Policy
    • Trauma system

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery

    Cite this

    Mann, N. C., Hedges, J. R., Sandoval, R., Worrall, W., Zechnich, A. D., Jurkovich, G. J., & Mullins, R. (1999). Trauma system impact on admission site: A comparison of two states. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 46(4), 631-637.

    Trauma system impact on admission site : A comparison of two states. / Mann, N. Clay; Hedges, Jerris R.; Sandoval, Ronald; Worrall, William; Zechnich, Andrew D.; Jurkovich, Gregory J.; Mullins, Richard.

    In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 46, No. 4, 04.1999, p. 631-637.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mann, NC, Hedges, JR, Sandoval, R, Worrall, W, Zechnich, AD, Jurkovich, GJ & Mullins, R 1999, 'Trauma system impact on admission site: A comparison of two states', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 631-637.
    Mann NC, Hedges JR, Sandoval R, Worrall W, Zechnich AD, Jurkovich GJ et al. Trauma system impact on admission site: A comparison of two states. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1999 Apr;46(4):631-637.
    Mann, N. Clay ; Hedges, Jerris R. ; Sandoval, Ronald ; Worrall, William ; Zechnich, Andrew D. ; Jurkovich, Gregory J. ; Mullins, Richard. / Trauma system impact on admission site : A comparison of two states. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1999 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 631-637.
    @article{6d45c825032840afb35f7626b441ab8c,
    title = "Trauma system impact on admission site: A comparison of two states",
    abstract = "Objective: To introduce a measure assessing statewide hospital admission patterns for trauma and evaluate its utility in identifying significant admission redistributions in neighboring states as a function of trauma system implementation. Methods: A retrospective claims database analysis was performed of hospitalized trauma patients in Washington and Oregon. The site of hospitalization and diagnostic information were used to determine an admission rate difference for each hospital: the rate of index patient admissions minus the rate of non-index patient admissions. Mean admission rate differences for Level II and III versus other hospitals in each state were compared as a function of time. Results: A bias in favor of admitting more serious injuries to Level II and III hospitals was seen with trauma system implementation in both states, but it was more pronounced in the Oregon trauma system. Conclusion: Assessment of admission rate differences is a helpful method of characterizing the evolution of statewide trauma systems.",
    keywords = "Health care delivery, Hospital admission, Policy, Trauma system",
    author = "Mann, {N. Clay} and Hedges, {Jerris R.} and Ronald Sandoval and William Worrall and Zechnich, {Andrew D.} and Jurkovich, {Gregory J.} and Richard Mullins",
    year = "1999",
    month = "4",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "46",
    pages = "631--637",
    journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
    issn = "2163-0755",
    publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Trauma system impact on admission site

    T2 - A comparison of two states

    AU - Mann, N. Clay

    AU - Hedges, Jerris R.

    AU - Sandoval, Ronald

    AU - Worrall, William

    AU - Zechnich, Andrew D.

    AU - Jurkovich, Gregory J.

    AU - Mullins, Richard

    PY - 1999/4

    Y1 - 1999/4

    N2 - Objective: To introduce a measure assessing statewide hospital admission patterns for trauma and evaluate its utility in identifying significant admission redistributions in neighboring states as a function of trauma system implementation. Methods: A retrospective claims database analysis was performed of hospitalized trauma patients in Washington and Oregon. The site of hospitalization and diagnostic information were used to determine an admission rate difference for each hospital: the rate of index patient admissions minus the rate of non-index patient admissions. Mean admission rate differences for Level II and III versus other hospitals in each state were compared as a function of time. Results: A bias in favor of admitting more serious injuries to Level II and III hospitals was seen with trauma system implementation in both states, but it was more pronounced in the Oregon trauma system. Conclusion: Assessment of admission rate differences is a helpful method of characterizing the evolution of statewide trauma systems.

    AB - Objective: To introduce a measure assessing statewide hospital admission patterns for trauma and evaluate its utility in identifying significant admission redistributions in neighboring states as a function of trauma system implementation. Methods: A retrospective claims database analysis was performed of hospitalized trauma patients in Washington and Oregon. The site of hospitalization and diagnostic information were used to determine an admission rate difference for each hospital: the rate of index patient admissions minus the rate of non-index patient admissions. Mean admission rate differences for Level II and III versus other hospitals in each state were compared as a function of time. Results: A bias in favor of admitting more serious injuries to Level II and III hospitals was seen with trauma system implementation in both states, but it was more pronounced in the Oregon trauma system. Conclusion: Assessment of admission rate differences is a helpful method of characterizing the evolution of statewide trauma systems.

    KW - Health care delivery

    KW - Hospital admission

    KW - Policy

    KW - Trauma system

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032890948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032890948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 46

    SP - 631

    EP - 637

    JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

    JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

    SN - 2163-0755

    IS - 4

    ER -