Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Present status, comparison with endoscopic therapy and shunt surgery, and future prospectives

Josef Rosch, Frederick Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the 13 years since its introduction into clinical practice, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become widely accepted worldwide as a percutaneous, interventional procedure for treating complications of portal hypertension. An experienced, skillful team, however, is necessary to ensure the high technical success of TIPS and to avoid its potential procedural complications. Presently, TIPS is used mainly for treatment of acute or recurrent hemorrhage from gastroesophageal varices refractory to endoscopic therapy. Randomized studies have shown that it is more effective than endoscopic treatment for preventing rebleeding; however, it is associated with a higher incidence of encephalopathy. Both treatments produce comparable survival rates. TIPS is also effective in the treatment of hepatogenic ascites and hydrothorax and hepatorenal syndrome. In comparison with surgical shunts, TIPS is a significantly less invasive procedure that can be done in poor surgical candidates with advanced cirrhosis. The high rate of shunt obstructions seen with TIPS mandates close surveillance and maintenance, rendering TIPS a multistage procedure. This is a major disadvantage of TIPS compared to surgery. Presently, both TIPS and surgical shunts have their place in the treatment of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage unresponsive to endoscopic therapy. TIPS is most suited for class B and C patients, particularly those who are candidates for liver transplantation. Surgical shunts should be considered for patients with well preserved liver function. Large, randomized controlled studies should be done to compare these treatment methods. Animal experimental and early clinical studies using covered stents (stent-grafts) are promising for the prevention of shunt obstructions and thus converting TIPS from a multistage to a one-stage procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-345
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portasystemic Shunt
Therapeutics
Stents
Hydrothorax
Hepatorenal Syndrome
Hemorrhage
Varicose Veins
Brain Diseases
Portal Hypertension
Ascites
Liver Transplantation
Fibrosis
Survival Rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{3a53ccd22c05469ba3902df59d62fa7b,
title = "Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Present status, comparison with endoscopic therapy and shunt surgery, and future prospectives",
abstract = "During the 13 years since its introduction into clinical practice, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become widely accepted worldwide as a percutaneous, interventional procedure for treating complications of portal hypertension. An experienced, skillful team, however, is necessary to ensure the high technical success of TIPS and to avoid its potential procedural complications. Presently, TIPS is used mainly for treatment of acute or recurrent hemorrhage from gastroesophageal varices refractory to endoscopic therapy. Randomized studies have shown that it is more effective than endoscopic treatment for preventing rebleeding; however, it is associated with a higher incidence of encephalopathy. Both treatments produce comparable survival rates. TIPS is also effective in the treatment of hepatogenic ascites and hydrothorax and hepatorenal syndrome. In comparison with surgical shunts, TIPS is a significantly less invasive procedure that can be done in poor surgical candidates with advanced cirrhosis. The high rate of shunt obstructions seen with TIPS mandates close surveillance and maintenance, rendering TIPS a multistage procedure. This is a major disadvantage of TIPS compared to surgery. Presently, both TIPS and surgical shunts have their place in the treatment of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage unresponsive to endoscopic therapy. TIPS is most suited for class B and C patients, particularly those who are candidates for liver transplantation. Surgical shunts should be considered for patients with well preserved liver function. Large, randomized controlled studies should be done to compare these treatment methods. Animal experimental and early clinical studies using covered stents (stent-grafts) are promising for the prevention of shunt obstructions and thus converting TIPS from a multistage to a one-stage procedure.",
author = "Josef Rosch and Frederick Keller",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s002680020380",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "337--345",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

T2 - Present status, comparison with endoscopic therapy and shunt surgery, and future prospectives

AU - Rosch, Josef

AU - Keller, Frederick

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - During the 13 years since its introduction into clinical practice, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become widely accepted worldwide as a percutaneous, interventional procedure for treating complications of portal hypertension. An experienced, skillful team, however, is necessary to ensure the high technical success of TIPS and to avoid its potential procedural complications. Presently, TIPS is used mainly for treatment of acute or recurrent hemorrhage from gastroesophageal varices refractory to endoscopic therapy. Randomized studies have shown that it is more effective than endoscopic treatment for preventing rebleeding; however, it is associated with a higher incidence of encephalopathy. Both treatments produce comparable survival rates. TIPS is also effective in the treatment of hepatogenic ascites and hydrothorax and hepatorenal syndrome. In comparison with surgical shunts, TIPS is a significantly less invasive procedure that can be done in poor surgical candidates with advanced cirrhosis. The high rate of shunt obstructions seen with TIPS mandates close surveillance and maintenance, rendering TIPS a multistage procedure. This is a major disadvantage of TIPS compared to surgery. Presently, both TIPS and surgical shunts have their place in the treatment of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage unresponsive to endoscopic therapy. TIPS is most suited for class B and C patients, particularly those who are candidates for liver transplantation. Surgical shunts should be considered for patients with well preserved liver function. Large, randomized controlled studies should be done to compare these treatment methods. Animal experimental and early clinical studies using covered stents (stent-grafts) are promising for the prevention of shunt obstructions and thus converting TIPS from a multistage to a one-stage procedure.

AB - During the 13 years since its introduction into clinical practice, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become widely accepted worldwide as a percutaneous, interventional procedure for treating complications of portal hypertension. An experienced, skillful team, however, is necessary to ensure the high technical success of TIPS and to avoid its potential procedural complications. Presently, TIPS is used mainly for treatment of acute or recurrent hemorrhage from gastroesophageal varices refractory to endoscopic therapy. Randomized studies have shown that it is more effective than endoscopic treatment for preventing rebleeding; however, it is associated with a higher incidence of encephalopathy. Both treatments produce comparable survival rates. TIPS is also effective in the treatment of hepatogenic ascites and hydrothorax and hepatorenal syndrome. In comparison with surgical shunts, TIPS is a significantly less invasive procedure that can be done in poor surgical candidates with advanced cirrhosis. The high rate of shunt obstructions seen with TIPS mandates close surveillance and maintenance, rendering TIPS a multistage procedure. This is a major disadvantage of TIPS compared to surgery. Presently, both TIPS and surgical shunts have their place in the treatment of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage unresponsive to endoscopic therapy. TIPS is most suited for class B and C patients, particularly those who are candidates for liver transplantation. Surgical shunts should be considered for patients with well preserved liver function. Large, randomized controlled studies should be done to compare these treatment methods. Animal experimental and early clinical studies using covered stents (stent-grafts) are promising for the prevention of shunt obstructions and thus converting TIPS from a multistage to a one-stage procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035049991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035049991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s002680020380

DO - 10.1007/s002680020380

M3 - Article

C2 - 11343189

AN - SCOPUS:0035049991

VL - 25

SP - 337

EP - 345

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 3

ER -