To tube or not to tube? The role of intubation during stroke thrombectomy

Courtney Takahashi, Conrad W. Liang, David S. Liebeskind, Jason D. Hinman

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the 10 years since the FDA first cleared the use of endovascular devices for the treatment of acute stroke, definitive evidence that such therapy improves outcomes remains lacking. The decision to intubate patients undergoing stroke thrombectomy impacts multiple variables that may influence outcomes after stroke. Three main areas where intubation may deleteriously affect acute stroke management include the introduction of delays in revascularization, fluctuations in peri-procedural blood pressure, and hypocapnia resulting in cerebral vasoconstriction. In this mini-review, we discuss the evidence supporting these limitations of intubation during stroke thrombectomy and encourage neurohospitalists, neurocritical care specialists and neurointerventionalists to carefully consider the decision to intubate during thrombectomy and provide strategies to avoid potential complications associated with its use in acute stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberArticle 170
JournalFrontiers in Neurology
Volume5 AUG
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Acute stroke
  • Clot retrieval
  • Endovascular therapy
  • Intubation
  • Thrombectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'To tube or not to tube? The role of intubation during stroke thrombectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Takahashi, C., Liang, C. W., Liebeskind, D. S., & Hinman, J. D. (2014). To tube or not to tube? The role of intubation during stroke thrombectomy. Frontiers in Neurology, 5 AUG, [Article 170]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00170