TY - JOUR
T1 - Tinnitus Outcomes Assessment
AU - Meikle, Mary B.
AU - Stewart, Barbara J.
AU - Griest, Susan E.
AU - Henry, James A.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Over the past two decades, recognition has grown that measures for evaluating treatment outcomes must be designed specifically to have high responsiveness. With that in mind, four major types of tinnitus measures are reviewed, including psychoacoustic measures, self-report questionnaires concerning functional effects of tinnitus, various rating scales, and global outcome measures. Nine commonly used tinnitus questionnaires, developed in the period 1980-2000, are reviewed. Because of many similarities between tinnitus and pain, comparisons between pain and tinnitus measures are discussed, and recommendations that have been made for developing a core set of measures to evaluate treatment-related changes in pain are presented as providing a fruitful path for developing a core set of measures for tinnitus. Finally, the importance of having both immediately obtainable outcome measures (psychoacoustic, rating scales, or single global measures) and longer term measures (questionnaires covering the negative effects of tinnitus) is emphasized for further work in tinnitus outcomes assessment.
AB - Over the past two decades, recognition has grown that measures for evaluating treatment outcomes must be designed specifically to have high responsiveness. With that in mind, four major types of tinnitus measures are reviewed, including psychoacoustic measures, self-report questionnaires concerning functional effects of tinnitus, various rating scales, and global outcome measures. Nine commonly used tinnitus questionnaires, developed in the period 1980-2000, are reviewed. Because of many similarities between tinnitus and pain, comparisons between pain and tinnitus measures are discussed, and recommendations that have been made for developing a core set of measures to evaluate treatment-related changes in pain are presented as providing a fruitful path for developing a core set of measures for tinnitus. Finally, the importance of having both immediately obtainable outcome measures (psychoacoustic, rating scales, or single global measures) and longer term measures (questionnaires covering the negative effects of tinnitus) is emphasized for further work in tinnitus outcomes assessment.
KW - core set of measures
KW - responsiveness of measures
KW - tinnitus outcomes
KW - tinnitus questionnaires
KW - tinnitus rating scales
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49349108367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49349108367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1084713808319943
DO - 10.1177/1084713808319943
M3 - Article
C2 - 18599500
AN - SCOPUS:49349108367
VL - 12
SP - 223
EP - 235
JO - Trends in hearing
JF - Trends in hearing
SN - 1084-7138
IS - 3
ER -