The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion

A comparison with the MMPI-2

Benjamin Morasco, Jeffrey D. Gfeller, Katherine A. Elder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this psychometric study, we compared the recently developed Validity Scales from the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992b) with the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Validity Scales. We collected data from clients (n = 74) who completed comprehensive psychological evaluations at a university-based outpatient mental health clinic. Correlations between the Validity Scales of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 were significant and in the expected directions. The relationships provide support for convergent and discriminant validity of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales. The percent agreement of invalid responding on the two measures was high, although the diagnostic agreement was modest (κ = .22-33). Finally, clients who responded in an invalid manner on the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales produced significantly different clinical profiles on the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 than clients with valid protocols. These results provide additional support for the clinical utility of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales as indicators of response bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-283
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume88
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

MMPI
Personality Inventory
Psychometrics
Mental Health
Outpatients
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion : A comparison with the MMPI-2. / Morasco, Benjamin; Gfeller, Jeffrey D.; Elder, Katherine A.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 88, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 276-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{76a4ebb8f6284b12a6df47c027a33fd2,
title = "The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: A comparison with the MMPI-2",
abstract = "In this psychometric study, we compared the recently developed Validity Scales from the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992b) with the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Validity Scales. We collected data from clients (n = 74) who completed comprehensive psychological evaluations at a university-based outpatient mental health clinic. Correlations between the Validity Scales of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 were significant and in the expected directions. The relationships provide support for convergent and discriminant validity of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales. The percent agreement of invalid responding on the two measures was high, although the diagnostic agreement was modest (κ = .22-33). Finally, clients who responded in an invalid manner on the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales produced significantly different clinical profiles on the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 than clients with valid protocols. These results provide additional support for the clinical utility of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales as indicators of response bias.",
author = "Benjamin Morasco and Gfeller, {Jeffrey D.} and Elder, {Katherine A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "276--283",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion

T2 - A comparison with the MMPI-2

AU - Morasco, Benjamin

AU - Gfeller, Jeffrey D.

AU - Elder, Katherine A.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - In this psychometric study, we compared the recently developed Validity Scales from the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992b) with the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Validity Scales. We collected data from clients (n = 74) who completed comprehensive psychological evaluations at a university-based outpatient mental health clinic. Correlations between the Validity Scales of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 were significant and in the expected directions. The relationships provide support for convergent and discriminant validity of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales. The percent agreement of invalid responding on the two measures was high, although the diagnostic agreement was modest (κ = .22-33). Finally, clients who responded in an invalid manner on the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales produced significantly different clinical profiles on the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 than clients with valid protocols. These results provide additional support for the clinical utility of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales as indicators of response bias.

AB - In this psychometric study, we compared the recently developed Validity Scales from the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992b) with the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Validity Scales. We collected data from clients (n = 74) who completed comprehensive psychological evaluations at a university-based outpatient mental health clinic. Correlations between the Validity Scales of the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 were significant and in the expected directions. The relationships provide support for convergent and discriminant validity of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales. The percent agreement of invalid responding on the two measures was high, although the diagnostic agreement was modest (κ = .22-33). Finally, clients who responded in an invalid manner on the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales produced significantly different clinical profiles on the NEO-PI-R and MMPI-2 than clients with valid protocols. These results provide additional support for the clinical utility of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales as indicators of response bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250361466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250361466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 276

EP - 283

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 3

ER -