The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center

Darlene R. Kitterman, Steven K. Cheng, David Dilts, Eric Orwoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The authors assessed the prevalence and associated economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at a single academic medical center. Method: The authors examined all clinical studies receiving institutional review board (IRB) review between FY2006 and FY2009 at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) for recruitment performance and analyzed them by type of IRB review (full-board, exempt, expedited), funding mechanism, and academic unit. A low-enrolling study included those with zero or one participant at the time of study termination. The authors calculated the costs associated with IRB review, financial setup, contract negotiation, and department study start-up activities and the total economic impact on OHSU of low-enrolling studies for FY2009. Results: A total of 837 clinical studies were terminated during the study period, 260 (31.1%) of which were low-enrolling. A greater proportion of low-enrolling studies were government funded than industry funded (P = .006). The authors found significant differences among the various academic units with respect to percentages of low-enrolling studies (from 10% to 67%). The uncompensated economic impact of low-enrolling studies was conservatively estimated to be nearly $1 million for FY2009. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of clinical studies incurred high institutional and departmental expense but resulted in little scientific benefit. Although a certain percentage of low-enrolling studies can be expected in any research organization, the overall number of such studies must be managed to reduce the aggregate costs of conducting research and to maximize research opportunities. Effective, proactive interventions are needed to address the prevalence and impact of low enrollment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1360-1366
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume86
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

economic impact
Research Ethics Committees
Economics
research organization
Research
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Time and Motion Studies
Negotiating
Contracts
funding
Industry
industry
Organizations
science
health
performance
Clinical Studies
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center. / Kitterman, Darlene R.; Cheng, Steven K.; Dilts, David; Orwoll, Eric.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 86, No. 11, 11.2011, p. 1360-1366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kitterman, Darlene R. ; Cheng, Steven K. ; Dilts, David ; Orwoll, Eric. / The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center. In: Academic Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 86, No. 11. pp. 1360-1366.
@article{05528be62230448dbf04f1b3ff1c6b0b,
title = "The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center",
abstract = "Purpose: The authors assessed the prevalence and associated economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at a single academic medical center. Method: The authors examined all clinical studies receiving institutional review board (IRB) review between FY2006 and FY2009 at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) for recruitment performance and analyzed them by type of IRB review (full-board, exempt, expedited), funding mechanism, and academic unit. A low-enrolling study included those with zero or one participant at the time of study termination. The authors calculated the costs associated with IRB review, financial setup, contract negotiation, and department study start-up activities and the total economic impact on OHSU of low-enrolling studies for FY2009. Results: A total of 837 clinical studies were terminated during the study period, 260 (31.1{\%}) of which were low-enrolling. A greater proportion of low-enrolling studies were government funded than industry funded (P = .006). The authors found significant differences among the various academic units with respect to percentages of low-enrolling studies (from 10{\%} to 67{\%}). The uncompensated economic impact of low-enrolling studies was conservatively estimated to be nearly $1 million for FY2009. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of clinical studies incurred high institutional and departmental expense but resulted in little scientific benefit. Although a certain percentage of low-enrolling studies can be expected in any research organization, the overall number of such studies must be managed to reduce the aggregate costs of conducting research and to maximize research opportunities. Effective, proactive interventions are needed to address the prevalence and impact of low enrollment.",
author = "Kitterman, {Darlene R.} and Cheng, {Steven K.} and David Dilts and Eric Orwoll",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182306440",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "1360--1366",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center

AU - Kitterman, Darlene R.

AU - Cheng, Steven K.

AU - Dilts, David

AU - Orwoll, Eric

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Purpose: The authors assessed the prevalence and associated economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at a single academic medical center. Method: The authors examined all clinical studies receiving institutional review board (IRB) review between FY2006 and FY2009 at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) for recruitment performance and analyzed them by type of IRB review (full-board, exempt, expedited), funding mechanism, and academic unit. A low-enrolling study included those with zero or one participant at the time of study termination. The authors calculated the costs associated with IRB review, financial setup, contract negotiation, and department study start-up activities and the total economic impact on OHSU of low-enrolling studies for FY2009. Results: A total of 837 clinical studies were terminated during the study period, 260 (31.1%) of which were low-enrolling. A greater proportion of low-enrolling studies were government funded than industry funded (P = .006). The authors found significant differences among the various academic units with respect to percentages of low-enrolling studies (from 10% to 67%). The uncompensated economic impact of low-enrolling studies was conservatively estimated to be nearly $1 million for FY2009. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of clinical studies incurred high institutional and departmental expense but resulted in little scientific benefit. Although a certain percentage of low-enrolling studies can be expected in any research organization, the overall number of such studies must be managed to reduce the aggregate costs of conducting research and to maximize research opportunities. Effective, proactive interventions are needed to address the prevalence and impact of low enrollment.

AB - Purpose: The authors assessed the prevalence and associated economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at a single academic medical center. Method: The authors examined all clinical studies receiving institutional review board (IRB) review between FY2006 and FY2009 at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) for recruitment performance and analyzed them by type of IRB review (full-board, exempt, expedited), funding mechanism, and academic unit. A low-enrolling study included those with zero or one participant at the time of study termination. The authors calculated the costs associated with IRB review, financial setup, contract negotiation, and department study start-up activities and the total economic impact on OHSU of low-enrolling studies for FY2009. Results: A total of 837 clinical studies were terminated during the study period, 260 (31.1%) of which were low-enrolling. A greater proportion of low-enrolling studies were government funded than industry funded (P = .006). The authors found significant differences among the various academic units with respect to percentages of low-enrolling studies (from 10% to 67%). The uncompensated economic impact of low-enrolling studies was conservatively estimated to be nearly $1 million for FY2009. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of clinical studies incurred high institutional and departmental expense but resulted in little scientific benefit. Although a certain percentage of low-enrolling studies can be expected in any research organization, the overall number of such studies must be managed to reduce the aggregate costs of conducting research and to maximize research opportunities. Effective, proactive interventions are needed to address the prevalence and impact of low enrollment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80255123795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80255123795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182306440

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182306440

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 1360

EP - 1366

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 11

ER -