The performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score in predicting renal mass radiofrequency ablation success

Jeffrey C. Gahan, Michael D. Richter, Casey Seideman, Clayton Trimmer, Danny Chan, Matthew Weaver, Ephrem O. Olweny, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To assess the predictive performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score for renal tumors undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods Patients who underwent RFA were identified from 2002 to 2011, and RENAL nephrometry scoring was performed for each. A modified RENAL (m-RENAL) nephrometry score was created to account for the small sizes of tumors ablated for which the size variable, R, was adjusted. A size of 3 cm was calculated as the optimal cutoff for the R component of the m-RENAL nephrometry score, and tumors were given an R score of 1 if <3 cm, 2 if 3-4 cm, or 3 if >4 cm. Other RENAL variables were unchanged. Oncologic outcomes were stratified by complexity tertiles defined as low (4-6), medium (7-9), and high (10-12). Outcomes were reported as initial ablation success (IAS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastatic-free survival (MFS). The Kaplan-Meir method was used to estimate survival based on complexity tertile.

Results Two hundred forty patients were identified who underwent RFA, of which 192 patients were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 32.2 months, and median tumor size was 2.4 cm. IAS was achieved in 185 of 192 patients (96.4%). Overall, the estimated 3-year RFS was 95.1% and MFS was 97.3%. There was no statistical difference between complexity tertiles using the standard RENAL nephrometry score; however, the m-RENAL nephrometry score was significantly associated with IAS and RFS (P =.027 and P =.003, respectively). There were too few events (n = 3) to perform statistical analysis for MFS.

Conclusion A modification to the size variable increases the performance of the RENAL nephrometry score when used to stratify RFA ablation success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-129
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kidney
Survival
Recurrence
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

The performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score in predicting renal mass radiofrequency ablation success. / Gahan, Jeffrey C.; Richter, Michael D.; Seideman, Casey; Trimmer, Clayton; Chan, Danny; Weaver, Matthew; Olweny, Ephrem O.; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.

In: Urology, Vol. 85, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 125-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gahan, JC, Richter, MD, Seideman, C, Trimmer, C, Chan, D, Weaver, M, Olweny, EO & Cadeddu, JA 2015, 'The performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score in predicting renal mass radiofrequency ablation success', Urology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.026
Gahan, Jeffrey C. ; Richter, Michael D. ; Seideman, Casey ; Trimmer, Clayton ; Chan, Danny ; Weaver, Matthew ; Olweny, Ephrem O. ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. / The performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score in predicting renal mass radiofrequency ablation success. In: Urology. 2015 ; Vol. 85, No. 1. pp. 125-129.
@article{5331fd2cd94e44b490356380aa3fe240,
title = "The performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score in predicting renal mass radiofrequency ablation success",
abstract = "Objective To assess the predictive performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score for renal tumors undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Methods Patients who underwent RFA were identified from 2002 to 2011, and RENAL nephrometry scoring was performed for each. A modified RENAL (m-RENAL) nephrometry score was created to account for the small sizes of tumors ablated for which the size variable, R, was adjusted. A size of 3 cm was calculated as the optimal cutoff for the R component of the m-RENAL nephrometry score, and tumors were given an R score of 1 if <3 cm, 2 if 3-4 cm, or 3 if >4 cm. Other RENAL variables were unchanged. Oncologic outcomes were stratified by complexity tertiles defined as low (4-6), medium (7-9), and high (10-12). Outcomes were reported as initial ablation success (IAS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastatic-free survival (MFS). The Kaplan-Meir method was used to estimate survival based on complexity tertile.Results Two hundred forty patients were identified who underwent RFA, of which 192 patients were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 32.2 months, and median tumor size was 2.4 cm. IAS was achieved in 185 of 192 patients (96.4{\%}). Overall, the estimated 3-year RFS was 95.1{\%} and MFS was 97.3{\%}. There was no statistical difference between complexity tertiles using the standard RENAL nephrometry score; however, the m-RENAL nephrometry score was significantly associated with IAS and RFS (P =.027 and P =.003, respectively). There were too few events (n = 3) to perform statistical analysis for MFS.Conclusion A modification to the size variable increases the performance of the RENAL nephrometry score when used to stratify RFA ablation success.",
author = "Gahan, {Jeffrey C.} and Richter, {Michael D.} and Casey Seideman and Clayton Trimmer and Danny Chan and Matthew Weaver and Olweny, {Ephrem O.} and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "125--129",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score in predicting renal mass radiofrequency ablation success

AU - Gahan, Jeffrey C.

AU - Richter, Michael D.

AU - Seideman, Casey

AU - Trimmer, Clayton

AU - Chan, Danny

AU - Weaver, Matthew

AU - Olweny, Ephrem O.

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objective To assess the predictive performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score for renal tumors undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Methods Patients who underwent RFA were identified from 2002 to 2011, and RENAL nephrometry scoring was performed for each. A modified RENAL (m-RENAL) nephrometry score was created to account for the small sizes of tumors ablated for which the size variable, R, was adjusted. A size of 3 cm was calculated as the optimal cutoff for the R component of the m-RENAL nephrometry score, and tumors were given an R score of 1 if <3 cm, 2 if 3-4 cm, or 3 if >4 cm. Other RENAL variables were unchanged. Oncologic outcomes were stratified by complexity tertiles defined as low (4-6), medium (7-9), and high (10-12). Outcomes were reported as initial ablation success (IAS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastatic-free survival (MFS). The Kaplan-Meir method was used to estimate survival based on complexity tertile.Results Two hundred forty patients were identified who underwent RFA, of which 192 patients were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 32.2 months, and median tumor size was 2.4 cm. IAS was achieved in 185 of 192 patients (96.4%). Overall, the estimated 3-year RFS was 95.1% and MFS was 97.3%. There was no statistical difference between complexity tertiles using the standard RENAL nephrometry score; however, the m-RENAL nephrometry score was significantly associated with IAS and RFS (P =.027 and P =.003, respectively). There were too few events (n = 3) to perform statistical analysis for MFS.Conclusion A modification to the size variable increases the performance of the RENAL nephrometry score when used to stratify RFA ablation success.

AB - Objective To assess the predictive performance of a modified RENAL nephrometry score for renal tumors undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA).Methods Patients who underwent RFA were identified from 2002 to 2011, and RENAL nephrometry scoring was performed for each. A modified RENAL (m-RENAL) nephrometry score was created to account for the small sizes of tumors ablated for which the size variable, R, was adjusted. A size of 3 cm was calculated as the optimal cutoff for the R component of the m-RENAL nephrometry score, and tumors were given an R score of 1 if <3 cm, 2 if 3-4 cm, or 3 if >4 cm. Other RENAL variables were unchanged. Oncologic outcomes were stratified by complexity tertiles defined as low (4-6), medium (7-9), and high (10-12). Outcomes were reported as initial ablation success (IAS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastatic-free survival (MFS). The Kaplan-Meir method was used to estimate survival based on complexity tertile.Results Two hundred forty patients were identified who underwent RFA, of which 192 patients were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 32.2 months, and median tumor size was 2.4 cm. IAS was achieved in 185 of 192 patients (96.4%). Overall, the estimated 3-year RFS was 95.1% and MFS was 97.3%. There was no statistical difference between complexity tertiles using the standard RENAL nephrometry score; however, the m-RENAL nephrometry score was significantly associated with IAS and RFS (P =.027 and P =.003, respectively). There were too few events (n = 3) to perform statistical analysis for MFS.Conclusion A modification to the size variable increases the performance of the RENAL nephrometry score when used to stratify RFA ablation success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919332940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919332940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.026

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 25440815

AN - SCOPUS:84919332940

VL - 85

SP - 125

EP - 129

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 1

ER -