The maternal-fetal medicine fellowship match system: Effectiveness at identifying successful clinician-investigators at 1 institution

Vincenzo Berghella, Jacquelyn Pelham, Juan Carlos Sabogal, Anthony Sciscione, Jorge Tolosa, Shailen Shah, Ronald J. Wapner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if rank position on the match list of a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellowship program predicted applicant academic success. STUDY DESIGN: The Thomas Jefferson University MFM fellowship program rank order lists and the results of the match were reviewed for 1991-2002. Evaluation of candidates includes an application, 3 letters of recommendation, curriculum vitae and interview upon invitation. Career success of graduated fellows was defined as MFM board certification, number of peer-reviewed publications and of Society for MFM (SMFM) abstract publications. RESULTS: Applicants ranked higher tended to have more peer-reviewed publications per applicant (9.2 vs. 4.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.5) and more abstracts presented at SMFM (7.6 vs. 8.0 vs. 3.8 p = 0.5) as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants had a higher probability of being MFM board certified (74 vs. 22%, p = 0.005), having more peer-reviewed publications (6.8 vs. 1.4, p = 0.005), and more abstracts (7.1 vs. 2.1, p <0.0001) as compared to nonranked applicants. CONCLUSION: MFM fellowship applicants who were ranked higher were more likely to publish as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants were more likely to publish and be MFM board certified as compared to nonranked applicants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)416-420
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Volume51
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mothers
Research Personnel
Medicine
Publications
Certification
Curriculum
Interviews

Keywords

  • Fellowships
  • Maternal-fetal medicine
  • Medical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

The maternal-fetal medicine fellowship match system : Effectiveness at identifying successful clinician-investigators at 1 institution. / Berghella, Vincenzo; Pelham, Jacquelyn; Sabogal, Juan Carlos; Sciscione, Anthony; Tolosa, Jorge; Shah, Shailen; Wapner, Ronald J.

In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Vol. 51, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 416-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berghella, Vincenzo ; Pelham, Jacquelyn ; Sabogal, Juan Carlos ; Sciscione, Anthony ; Tolosa, Jorge ; Shah, Shailen ; Wapner, Ronald J. / The maternal-fetal medicine fellowship match system : Effectiveness at identifying successful clinician-investigators at 1 institution. In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist. 2006 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 416-420.
@article{cef6b5e59d8544f0977e97ce8668ef01,
title = "The maternal-fetal medicine fellowship match system: Effectiveness at identifying successful clinician-investigators at 1 institution",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine if rank position on the match list of a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellowship program predicted applicant academic success. STUDY DESIGN: The Thomas Jefferson University MFM fellowship program rank order lists and the results of the match were reviewed for 1991-2002. Evaluation of candidates includes an application, 3 letters of recommendation, curriculum vitae and interview upon invitation. Career success of graduated fellows was defined as MFM board certification, number of peer-reviewed publications and of Society for MFM (SMFM) abstract publications. RESULTS: Applicants ranked higher tended to have more peer-reviewed publications per applicant (9.2 vs. 4.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.5) and more abstracts presented at SMFM (7.6 vs. 8.0 vs. 3.8 p = 0.5) as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants had a higher probability of being MFM board certified (74 vs. 22{\%}, p = 0.005), having more peer-reviewed publications (6.8 vs. 1.4, p = 0.005), and more abstracts (7.1 vs. 2.1, p <0.0001) as compared to nonranked applicants. CONCLUSION: MFM fellowship applicants who were ranked higher were more likely to publish as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants were more likely to publish and be MFM board certified as compared to nonranked applicants.",
keywords = "Fellowships, Maternal-fetal medicine, Medical education",
author = "Vincenzo Berghella and Jacquelyn Pelham and Sabogal, {Juan Carlos} and Anthony Sciscione and Jorge Tolosa and Shailen Shah and Wapner, {Ronald J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "416--420",
journal = "The Journal of reproductive medicine",
issn = "0024-7758",
publisher = "Donna Kessel",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The maternal-fetal medicine fellowship match system

T2 - Effectiveness at identifying successful clinician-investigators at 1 institution

AU - Berghella, Vincenzo

AU - Pelham, Jacquelyn

AU - Sabogal, Juan Carlos

AU - Sciscione, Anthony

AU - Tolosa, Jorge

AU - Shah, Shailen

AU - Wapner, Ronald J.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine if rank position on the match list of a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellowship program predicted applicant academic success. STUDY DESIGN: The Thomas Jefferson University MFM fellowship program rank order lists and the results of the match were reviewed for 1991-2002. Evaluation of candidates includes an application, 3 letters of recommendation, curriculum vitae and interview upon invitation. Career success of graduated fellows was defined as MFM board certification, number of peer-reviewed publications and of Society for MFM (SMFM) abstract publications. RESULTS: Applicants ranked higher tended to have more peer-reviewed publications per applicant (9.2 vs. 4.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.5) and more abstracts presented at SMFM (7.6 vs. 8.0 vs. 3.8 p = 0.5) as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants had a higher probability of being MFM board certified (74 vs. 22%, p = 0.005), having more peer-reviewed publications (6.8 vs. 1.4, p = 0.005), and more abstracts (7.1 vs. 2.1, p <0.0001) as compared to nonranked applicants. CONCLUSION: MFM fellowship applicants who were ranked higher were more likely to publish as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants were more likely to publish and be MFM board certified as compared to nonranked applicants.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine if rank position on the match list of a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) fellowship program predicted applicant academic success. STUDY DESIGN: The Thomas Jefferson University MFM fellowship program rank order lists and the results of the match were reviewed for 1991-2002. Evaluation of candidates includes an application, 3 letters of recommendation, curriculum vitae and interview upon invitation. Career success of graduated fellows was defined as MFM board certification, number of peer-reviewed publications and of Society for MFM (SMFM) abstract publications. RESULTS: Applicants ranked higher tended to have more peer-reviewed publications per applicant (9.2 vs. 4.7 vs. 4.4, p = 0.5) and more abstracts presented at SMFM (7.6 vs. 8.0 vs. 3.8 p = 0.5) as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants had a higher probability of being MFM board certified (74 vs. 22%, p = 0.005), having more peer-reviewed publications (6.8 vs. 1.4, p = 0.005), and more abstracts (7.1 vs. 2.1, p <0.0001) as compared to nonranked applicants. CONCLUSION: MFM fellowship applicants who were ranked higher were more likely to publish as compared to lower-ranked applicants. Ranked applicants were more likely to publish and be MFM board certified as compared to nonranked applicants.

KW - Fellowships

KW - Maternal-fetal medicine

KW - Medical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646800469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646800469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16779990

AN - SCOPUS:33646800469

VL - 51

SP - 416

EP - 420

JO - The Journal of reproductive medicine

JF - The Journal of reproductive medicine

SN - 0024-7758

IS - 5

ER -