The International Classification of the radiological Complexity (ICC) of frontal recess and frontal sinus

Peter John Wormald, Ahmed Bassiouni, Claudio A. Callejas, David W. Kennedy, Martin J. Citardi, Timothy Smith, Richard R. Orlandi, Oliver Kaschke, Jin Keat Siow, Kornel Szczygielski, Valerie Lund, Wytske Fokkens, Alkis J. Psaltis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The frontal sinus is considered the most challenging sinus to address surgically. There are no current classifications of the degree of surgical complexity of different frontal sinus configurations. The aim of this study is to develop a classification system of the degree of complexity of frontal recess surgery based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Authors were asked to submit a classification system. These were circulated to all authors. Selection of the final 3 classifications was based on a majority consensus. These classifications were compared further for time-taken, ease-of-use, and interrater agreement. These were assessed by the authors on 10 CT scans representing a range of anticipated surgical difficulty. Results: Out of 3 compared classifications, classification A was the quickest to score (1.44 minutes vs 1.57 minutes and 2.25 minutes), subjectively easiest (3.23 vs 4.07 and 5 on a visual analogue scale [VAS]), and had a moderate interrater agreement (0.52 vs 0.42 and 0.79). In addition, the grading of complexity was as good whether measurements were taken on the CT scans or whether size of the frontal ostium was visually estimated. Conclusion: We propose a fast, easy classification to anticipate the complexity of surgery in the frontal sinus and recess, for patients undergoing primary surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Forum of Allergy and Rhinology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Frontal Sinus
Tomography
Visual Analog Scale

Keywords

  • Difficulty of surgery
  • Endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Frontal sinus
  • Frontal sinus classification
  • Surgical complexity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The International Classification of the radiological Complexity (ICC) of frontal recess and frontal sinus. / Wormald, Peter John; Bassiouni, Ahmed; Callejas, Claudio A.; Kennedy, David W.; Citardi, Martin J.; Smith, Timothy; Orlandi, Richard R.; Kaschke, Oliver; Siow, Jin Keat; Szczygielski, Kornel; Lund, Valerie; Fokkens, Wytske; Psaltis, Alkis J.

In: International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wormald, PJ, Bassiouni, A, Callejas, CA, Kennedy, DW, Citardi, MJ, Smith, T, Orlandi, RR, Kaschke, O, Siow, JK, Szczygielski, K, Lund, V, Fokkens, W & Psaltis, AJ 2016, 'The International Classification of the radiological Complexity (ICC) of frontal recess and frontal sinus', International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21893
Wormald, Peter John ; Bassiouni, Ahmed ; Callejas, Claudio A. ; Kennedy, David W. ; Citardi, Martin J. ; Smith, Timothy ; Orlandi, Richard R. ; Kaschke, Oliver ; Siow, Jin Keat ; Szczygielski, Kornel ; Lund, Valerie ; Fokkens, Wytske ; Psaltis, Alkis J. / The International Classification of the radiological Complexity (ICC) of frontal recess and frontal sinus. In: International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology. 2016.
@article{cfabe08362f04cdb85baf0ebf9c20000,
title = "The International Classification of the radiological Complexity (ICC) of frontal recess and frontal sinus",
abstract = "Background: The frontal sinus is considered the most challenging sinus to address surgically. There are no current classifications of the degree of surgical complexity of different frontal sinus configurations. The aim of this study is to develop a classification system of the degree of complexity of frontal recess surgery based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Authors were asked to submit a classification system. These were circulated to all authors. Selection of the final 3 classifications was based on a majority consensus. These classifications were compared further for time-taken, ease-of-use, and interrater agreement. These were assessed by the authors on 10 CT scans representing a range of anticipated surgical difficulty. Results: Out of 3 compared classifications, classification A was the quickest to score (1.44 minutes vs 1.57 minutes and 2.25 minutes), subjectively easiest (3.23 vs 4.07 and 5 on a visual analogue scale [VAS]), and had a moderate interrater agreement (0.52 vs 0.42 and 0.79). In addition, the grading of complexity was as good whether measurements were taken on the CT scans or whether size of the frontal ostium was visually estimated. Conclusion: We propose a fast, easy classification to anticipate the complexity of surgery in the frontal sinus and recess, for patients undergoing primary surgery.",
keywords = "Difficulty of surgery, Endoscopic sinus surgery, Frontal sinus, Frontal sinus classification, Surgical complexity",
author = "Wormald, {Peter John} and Ahmed Bassiouni and Callejas, {Claudio A.} and Kennedy, {David W.} and Citardi, {Martin J.} and Timothy Smith and Orlandi, {Richard R.} and Oliver Kaschke and Siow, {Jin Keat} and Kornel Szczygielski and Valerie Lund and Wytske Fokkens and Psaltis, {Alkis J.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/alr.21893",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology",
issn = "2042-6976",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The International Classification of the radiological Complexity (ICC) of frontal recess and frontal sinus

AU - Wormald, Peter John

AU - Bassiouni, Ahmed

AU - Callejas, Claudio A.

AU - Kennedy, David W.

AU - Citardi, Martin J.

AU - Smith, Timothy

AU - Orlandi, Richard R.

AU - Kaschke, Oliver

AU - Siow, Jin Keat

AU - Szczygielski, Kornel

AU - Lund, Valerie

AU - Fokkens, Wytske

AU - Psaltis, Alkis J.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: The frontal sinus is considered the most challenging sinus to address surgically. There are no current classifications of the degree of surgical complexity of different frontal sinus configurations. The aim of this study is to develop a classification system of the degree of complexity of frontal recess surgery based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Authors were asked to submit a classification system. These were circulated to all authors. Selection of the final 3 classifications was based on a majority consensus. These classifications were compared further for time-taken, ease-of-use, and interrater agreement. These were assessed by the authors on 10 CT scans representing a range of anticipated surgical difficulty. Results: Out of 3 compared classifications, classification A was the quickest to score (1.44 minutes vs 1.57 minutes and 2.25 minutes), subjectively easiest (3.23 vs 4.07 and 5 on a visual analogue scale [VAS]), and had a moderate interrater agreement (0.52 vs 0.42 and 0.79). In addition, the grading of complexity was as good whether measurements were taken on the CT scans or whether size of the frontal ostium was visually estimated. Conclusion: We propose a fast, easy classification to anticipate the complexity of surgery in the frontal sinus and recess, for patients undergoing primary surgery.

AB - Background: The frontal sinus is considered the most challenging sinus to address surgically. There are no current classifications of the degree of surgical complexity of different frontal sinus configurations. The aim of this study is to develop a classification system of the degree of complexity of frontal recess surgery based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Authors were asked to submit a classification system. These were circulated to all authors. Selection of the final 3 classifications was based on a majority consensus. These classifications were compared further for time-taken, ease-of-use, and interrater agreement. These were assessed by the authors on 10 CT scans representing a range of anticipated surgical difficulty. Results: Out of 3 compared classifications, classification A was the quickest to score (1.44 minutes vs 1.57 minutes and 2.25 minutes), subjectively easiest (3.23 vs 4.07 and 5 on a visual analogue scale [VAS]), and had a moderate interrater agreement (0.52 vs 0.42 and 0.79). In addition, the grading of complexity was as good whether measurements were taken on the CT scans or whether size of the frontal ostium was visually estimated. Conclusion: We propose a fast, easy classification to anticipate the complexity of surgery in the frontal sinus and recess, for patients undergoing primary surgery.

KW - Difficulty of surgery

KW - Endoscopic sinus surgery

KW - Frontal sinus

KW - Frontal sinus classification

KW - Surgical complexity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006337147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006337147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/alr.21893

DO - 10.1002/alr.21893

M3 - Article

C2 - 27918154

AN - SCOPUS:85006337147

JO - International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

JF - International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

SN - 2042-6976

ER -