The ‘indirect costs’ of underfunding foreign partners in global health research: A case study

Johanna T. Crane, Irene Andia Biraro, Tamer M. Fouad, Yap Boum, David Bangsberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study of a global health research partnership assesses how U.S. fiscal administrative policies impact capacity building at foreign partner institutions. We conducted a case study of a research collaboration between Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) in Mbarara, Uganda, and originally the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), but now Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Our case study is based on three of the authors’ experiences directing and working with this partnership from its inception in 2003 through 2015. The collaboration established an independent Ugandan non-profit to act as a local fiscal agent and grants administrator and to assure compliance with the Ugandan labour and tax law. This structure, combined with low indirect cost reimbursements from U.S. federal grants, failed to strengthen institutional capacity at MUST. In response to problems with this model, the collaboration established a contracts and grants office at MUST. This office has built administrative capacity at MUST but has also generated new risks and expenses for MGH. We argue that U.S. fiscal administrative practices may drain rather than build capacity at African universities by underfunding the administrative costs of global health research, circumventing host country institutions, and externalising legal and financial risks associated with international work. Abbreviations: MGH: Massachusetts General Hospital; MUST: Mbarara University of Science and Technology; NIH: National Institutes of Health; UCSF: University of California San Francisco; URI: Uganda Research Institute.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1422-1429
Number of pages8
JournalGlobal Public Health
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2018

Fingerprint

Technology
Costs and Cost Analysis
General Hospitals
San Francisco
Organized Financing
Research
Uganda
Capacity Building
Taxes
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Contracts
Administrative Personnel
Global Health

Keywords

  • capacity building
  • collaboration
  • Global health
  • inequality
  • partnership

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The ‘indirect costs’ of underfunding foreign partners in global health research : A case study. / Crane, Johanna T.; Andia Biraro, Irene; Fouad, Tamer M.; Boum, Yap; Bangsberg, David.

In: Global Public Health, Vol. 13, No. 10, 03.10.2018, p. 1422-1429.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crane, Johanna T. ; Andia Biraro, Irene ; Fouad, Tamer M. ; Boum, Yap ; Bangsberg, David. / The ‘indirect costs’ of underfunding foreign partners in global health research : A case study. In: Global Public Health. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 10. pp. 1422-1429.
@article{6b2ea5af73724af8a34912d0591541bb,
title = "The ‘indirect costs’ of underfunding foreign partners in global health research: A case study",
abstract = "This study of a global health research partnership assesses how U.S. fiscal administrative policies impact capacity building at foreign partner institutions. We conducted a case study of a research collaboration between Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) in Mbarara, Uganda, and originally the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), but now Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Our case study is based on three of the authors’ experiences directing and working with this partnership from its inception in 2003 through 2015. The collaboration established an independent Ugandan non-profit to act as a local fiscal agent and grants administrator and to assure compliance with the Ugandan labour and tax law. This structure, combined with low indirect cost reimbursements from U.S. federal grants, failed to strengthen institutional capacity at MUST. In response to problems with this model, the collaboration established a contracts and grants office at MUST. This office has built administrative capacity at MUST but has also generated new risks and expenses for MGH. We argue that U.S. fiscal administrative practices may drain rather than build capacity at African universities by underfunding the administrative costs of global health research, circumventing host country institutions, and externalising legal and financial risks associated with international work. Abbreviations: MGH: Massachusetts General Hospital; MUST: Mbarara University of Science and Technology; NIH: National Institutes of Health; UCSF: University of California San Francisco; URI: Uganda Research Institute.",
keywords = "capacity building, collaboration, Global health, inequality, partnership",
author = "Crane, {Johanna T.} and {Andia Biraro}, Irene and Fouad, {Tamer M.} and Yap Boum and David Bangsberg",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/17441692.2017.1372504",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1422--1429",
journal = "Global Public Health",
issn = "1744-1692",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ‘indirect costs’ of underfunding foreign partners in global health research

T2 - A case study

AU - Crane, Johanna T.

AU - Andia Biraro, Irene

AU - Fouad, Tamer M.

AU - Boum, Yap

AU - Bangsberg, David

PY - 2018/10/3

Y1 - 2018/10/3

N2 - This study of a global health research partnership assesses how U.S. fiscal administrative policies impact capacity building at foreign partner institutions. We conducted a case study of a research collaboration between Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) in Mbarara, Uganda, and originally the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), but now Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Our case study is based on three of the authors’ experiences directing and working with this partnership from its inception in 2003 through 2015. The collaboration established an independent Ugandan non-profit to act as a local fiscal agent and grants administrator and to assure compliance with the Ugandan labour and tax law. This structure, combined with low indirect cost reimbursements from U.S. federal grants, failed to strengthen institutional capacity at MUST. In response to problems with this model, the collaboration established a contracts and grants office at MUST. This office has built administrative capacity at MUST but has also generated new risks and expenses for MGH. We argue that U.S. fiscal administrative practices may drain rather than build capacity at African universities by underfunding the administrative costs of global health research, circumventing host country institutions, and externalising legal and financial risks associated with international work. Abbreviations: MGH: Massachusetts General Hospital; MUST: Mbarara University of Science and Technology; NIH: National Institutes of Health; UCSF: University of California San Francisco; URI: Uganda Research Institute.

AB - This study of a global health research partnership assesses how U.S. fiscal administrative policies impact capacity building at foreign partner institutions. We conducted a case study of a research collaboration between Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) in Mbarara, Uganda, and originally the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), but now Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Our case study is based on three of the authors’ experiences directing and working with this partnership from its inception in 2003 through 2015. The collaboration established an independent Ugandan non-profit to act as a local fiscal agent and grants administrator and to assure compliance with the Ugandan labour and tax law. This structure, combined with low indirect cost reimbursements from U.S. federal grants, failed to strengthen institutional capacity at MUST. In response to problems with this model, the collaboration established a contracts and grants office at MUST. This office has built administrative capacity at MUST but has also generated new risks and expenses for MGH. We argue that U.S. fiscal administrative practices may drain rather than build capacity at African universities by underfunding the administrative costs of global health research, circumventing host country institutions, and externalising legal and financial risks associated with international work. Abbreviations: MGH: Massachusetts General Hospital; MUST: Mbarara University of Science and Technology; NIH: National Institutes of Health; UCSF: University of California San Francisco; URI: Uganda Research Institute.

KW - capacity building

KW - collaboration

KW - Global health

KW - inequality

KW - partnership

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029544231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029544231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17441692.2017.1372504

DO - 10.1080/17441692.2017.1372504

M3 - Article

C2 - 28920518

AN - SCOPUS:85029544231

VL - 13

SP - 1422

EP - 1429

JO - Global Public Health

JF - Global Public Health

SN - 1744-1692

IS - 10

ER -