The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction

Wojciech Dec, Timo Peltomaki, Stephen M. Warren, Judah Garfinkle, Barry H. Grayson, Joseph G. McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unilateral craniofacial microsomia is characterized by soft-tissue and bony deficiencies. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be used to augment the hypoplastic skeleton and improve facial symmetry. The aim of this study was to determine how the vector of unilateral mandibular distraction affects treatment outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart and radiographic review was conducted of all patients treated with external mandibular distraction osteogenesis between October of 1990 and February of 2004 (n = 185). A subset of 42 patients underwent primary unilateral, uniplanar, external distraction, and 13 patients were found to have satisfied inclusion criteria and had adequate predistraction and postdistraction lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms. Cephalometric tracings were made and multiple points and planes were assessed before and after distraction. RESULTS: A strong correlation was noted between the vector of distraction and the movement of the mandible. A horizontal vector of distraction resulted in minimal increase in ramal length but a marked shift in the mandibular midline (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). In contrast, a vertical vector of distraction resulted in marked mandibular ramus lengthening but minimal mandibular midline shift (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Mathematical formulas were derived to correlate the distraction vector and mandibular movements to improve preoperative planning. CONCLUSIONS: Successful distraction is dependent on accurate preoperative planning and prediction of outcomes. This study demonstrates a predictable relationship between the vector of unilateral distraction and the mandibular response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2084-2092
Number of pages9
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume121
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Distraction Osteogenesis
Cephalometry
Goldenhar Syndrome
Mandible
Skeleton

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction. / Dec, Wojciech; Peltomaki, Timo; Warren, Stephen M.; Garfinkle, Judah; Grayson, Barry H.; McCarthy, Joseph G.

In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 121, No. 6, 01.06.2008, p. 2084-2092.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dec, Wojciech ; Peltomaki, Timo ; Warren, Stephen M. ; Garfinkle, Judah ; Grayson, Barry H. ; McCarthy, Joseph G. / The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 121, No. 6. pp. 2084-2092.
@article{3d761427486d4dc6a03a02ade3268835,
title = "The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Unilateral craniofacial microsomia is characterized by soft-tissue and bony deficiencies. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be used to augment the hypoplastic skeleton and improve facial symmetry. The aim of this study was to determine how the vector of unilateral mandibular distraction affects treatment outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart and radiographic review was conducted of all patients treated with external mandibular distraction osteogenesis between October of 1990 and February of 2004 (n = 185). A subset of 42 patients underwent primary unilateral, uniplanar, external distraction, and 13 patients were found to have satisfied inclusion criteria and had adequate predistraction and postdistraction lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms. Cephalometric tracings were made and multiple points and planes were assessed before and after distraction. RESULTS: A strong correlation was noted between the vector of distraction and the movement of the mandible. A horizontal vector of distraction resulted in minimal increase in ramal length but a marked shift in the mandibular midline (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). In contrast, a vertical vector of distraction resulted in marked mandibular ramus lengthening but minimal mandibular midline shift (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Mathematical formulas were derived to correlate the distraction vector and mandibular movements to improve preoperative planning. CONCLUSIONS: Successful distraction is dependent on accurate preoperative planning and prediction of outcomes. This study demonstrates a predictable relationship between the vector of unilateral distraction and the mandibular response.",
author = "Wojciech Dec and Timo Peltomaki and Warren, {Stephen M.} and Judah Garfinkle and Grayson, {Barry H.} and McCarthy, {Joseph G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817081b6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "2084--2092",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distraction

AU - Dec, Wojciech

AU - Peltomaki, Timo

AU - Warren, Stephen M.

AU - Garfinkle, Judah

AU - Grayson, Barry H.

AU - McCarthy, Joseph G.

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Unilateral craniofacial microsomia is characterized by soft-tissue and bony deficiencies. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be used to augment the hypoplastic skeleton and improve facial symmetry. The aim of this study was to determine how the vector of unilateral mandibular distraction affects treatment outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart and radiographic review was conducted of all patients treated with external mandibular distraction osteogenesis between October of 1990 and February of 2004 (n = 185). A subset of 42 patients underwent primary unilateral, uniplanar, external distraction, and 13 patients were found to have satisfied inclusion criteria and had adequate predistraction and postdistraction lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms. Cephalometric tracings were made and multiple points and planes were assessed before and after distraction. RESULTS: A strong correlation was noted between the vector of distraction and the movement of the mandible. A horizontal vector of distraction resulted in minimal increase in ramal length but a marked shift in the mandibular midline (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). In contrast, a vertical vector of distraction resulted in marked mandibular ramus lengthening but minimal mandibular midline shift (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Mathematical formulas were derived to correlate the distraction vector and mandibular movements to improve preoperative planning. CONCLUSIONS: Successful distraction is dependent on accurate preoperative planning and prediction of outcomes. This study demonstrates a predictable relationship between the vector of unilateral distraction and the mandibular response.

AB - BACKGROUND: Unilateral craniofacial microsomia is characterized by soft-tissue and bony deficiencies. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be used to augment the hypoplastic skeleton and improve facial symmetry. The aim of this study was to determine how the vector of unilateral mandibular distraction affects treatment outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart and radiographic review was conducted of all patients treated with external mandibular distraction osteogenesis between October of 1990 and February of 2004 (n = 185). A subset of 42 patients underwent primary unilateral, uniplanar, external distraction, and 13 patients were found to have satisfied inclusion criteria and had adequate predistraction and postdistraction lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms. Cephalometric tracings were made and multiple points and planes were assessed before and after distraction. RESULTS: A strong correlation was noted between the vector of distraction and the movement of the mandible. A horizontal vector of distraction resulted in minimal increase in ramal length but a marked shift in the mandibular midline (r = 0.68, p < 0.05). In contrast, a vertical vector of distraction resulted in marked mandibular ramus lengthening but minimal mandibular midline shift (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Mathematical formulas were derived to correlate the distraction vector and mandibular movements to improve preoperative planning. CONCLUSIONS: Successful distraction is dependent on accurate preoperative planning and prediction of outcomes. This study demonstrates a predictable relationship between the vector of unilateral distraction and the mandibular response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48049091842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48049091842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817081b6

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817081b6

M3 - Article

C2 - 18520899

AN - SCOPUS:48049091842

VL - 121

SP - 2084

EP - 2092

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 6

ER -