The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding

systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Jeanne-Marie Guise, Valerie Palda, Carolyn Westhoff, Benjamin K S Chan, Mark Helfand, Tracy A. Lieu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to systematically review whether primary care-based interventions improve initiation and duration of breastfeeding. METHODS: Studies were found by searching MEDLINE (1966-2001), Health-STAR, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and bibliographies of identified trials and review articles. Studies were included if they originated in the primary care setting and were conducted in a developed country, written in English, and contained a concurrent control group. RESULTS: Thirty randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and 5 systematic reviews of breastfeeding counseling were included. Educational programs had the greatest effect of any single intervention on both initiation (difference 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.34) and short-term duration (difference 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.50). Support programs conducted by telephone, in person, or both increased short-term (difference 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.19) and long-term duration (difference 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16). In contrast, written materials such as pamphlets did not significantly increase breastfeeding. Data were insufficient to determine whether the combination of education with support was more effective than education alone. CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs were the most effective single intervention. One woman would breast-feed for up to 3 months for every 3 to 5 women attending breastfeeding educational programs. Future research and policy should focus on translating these findings into more widespread practice in diverse primary care settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-78
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume1
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jul 2003

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Breast Feeding
Meta-Analysis
Primary Health Care
Confidence Intervals
Databases
Education
Pamphlets
National Health Programs
Bibliography
Developed Countries
Telephone
MEDLINE
Counseling
Breast
Randomized Controlled Trials
Control Groups
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding : systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. / Guise, Jeanne-Marie; Palda, Valerie; Westhoff, Carolyn; Chan, Benjamin K S; Helfand, Mark; Lieu, Tracy A.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 2, 07.2003, p. 70-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f12994b2b2f441f9bf13b15ce7aa9419,
title = "The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We wanted to systematically review whether primary care-based interventions improve initiation and duration of breastfeeding. METHODS: Studies were found by searching MEDLINE (1966-2001), Health-STAR, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and bibliographies of identified trials and review articles. Studies were included if they originated in the primary care setting and were conducted in a developed country, written in English, and contained a concurrent control group. RESULTS: Thirty randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and 5 systematic reviews of breastfeeding counseling were included. Educational programs had the greatest effect of any single intervention on both initiation (difference 0.23; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.34) and short-term duration (difference 0.39; 95{\%} CI, 0.27-0.50). Support programs conducted by telephone, in person, or both increased short-term (difference 0.11; 95{\%} CI, 0.03-0.19) and long-term duration (difference 0.08; 95{\%} CI, 0.02-0.16). In contrast, written materials such as pamphlets did not significantly increase breastfeeding. Data were insufficient to determine whether the combination of education with support was more effective than education alone. CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs were the most effective single intervention. One woman would breast-feed for up to 3 months for every 3 to 5 women attending breastfeeding educational programs. Future research and policy should focus on translating these findings into more widespread practice in diverse primary care settings.",
author = "Jeanne-Marie Guise and Valerie Palda and Carolyn Westhoff and Chan, {Benjamin K S} and Mark Helfand and Lieu, {Tracy A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "70--78",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding

T2 - systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

AU - Guise, Jeanne-Marie

AU - Palda, Valerie

AU - Westhoff, Carolyn

AU - Chan, Benjamin K S

AU - Helfand, Mark

AU - Lieu, Tracy A.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - PURPOSE: We wanted to systematically review whether primary care-based interventions improve initiation and duration of breastfeeding. METHODS: Studies were found by searching MEDLINE (1966-2001), Health-STAR, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and bibliographies of identified trials and review articles. Studies were included if they originated in the primary care setting and were conducted in a developed country, written in English, and contained a concurrent control group. RESULTS: Thirty randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and 5 systematic reviews of breastfeeding counseling were included. Educational programs had the greatest effect of any single intervention on both initiation (difference 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.34) and short-term duration (difference 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.50). Support programs conducted by telephone, in person, or both increased short-term (difference 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.19) and long-term duration (difference 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16). In contrast, written materials such as pamphlets did not significantly increase breastfeeding. Data were insufficient to determine whether the combination of education with support was more effective than education alone. CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs were the most effective single intervention. One woman would breast-feed for up to 3 months for every 3 to 5 women attending breastfeeding educational programs. Future research and policy should focus on translating these findings into more widespread practice in diverse primary care settings.

AB - PURPOSE: We wanted to systematically review whether primary care-based interventions improve initiation and duration of breastfeeding. METHODS: Studies were found by searching MEDLINE (1966-2001), Health-STAR, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and bibliographies of identified trials and review articles. Studies were included if they originated in the primary care setting and were conducted in a developed country, written in English, and contained a concurrent control group. RESULTS: Thirty randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and 5 systematic reviews of breastfeeding counseling were included. Educational programs had the greatest effect of any single intervention on both initiation (difference 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.34) and short-term duration (difference 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.50). Support programs conducted by telephone, in person, or both increased short-term (difference 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.19) and long-term duration (difference 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16). In contrast, written materials such as pamphlets did not significantly increase breastfeeding. Data were insufficient to determine whether the combination of education with support was more effective than education alone. CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs were the most effective single intervention. One woman would breast-feed for up to 3 months for every 3 to 5 women attending breastfeeding educational programs. Future research and policy should focus on translating these findings into more widespread practice in diverse primary care settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642282307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642282307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 70

EP - 78

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 2

ER -