The characteristics of adults with severe hearing loss

Pamela Souza, Eric Hoover, Michael Blackburn, Frederick Gallun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Severe hearing loss impairs communication in a wide range of listening environments. However, we lack data as to the specific objective and subjective abilities of listeners with severe hearing loss. Insight into those abilities may inform treatment choices. Purpose: The primary goal was to describe the audiometric profiles, spectral resolution ability, and objective and subjective speech perception of a sample of adult listeners with severe hearing loss, and to consider the relationships among those measures. We also considered the typical fitting received by individuals with severe loss, in terms of hearing aid style, electroacoustic characteristics, and features, as well as supplementary device use. Research Design: A within-subjects design was used. Study Sample: Participants included 36 adults aged 54-93 yr with unilateral or bilateral severe hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: Testing included a full hearing and hearing aid history; audiometric evaluation; loudness growth and dynamic range; spectral resolution; assessment of cochlear dead regions; objective and subjective assessment of speech recognition; and electroacoustic evaluation of current hearing aids. Regression models were used to analyze relationships between hearing loss, spectral resolution, and speech recognition. Results: For speech in quiet, 60% of the variance was approximately equally accounted for by amount of hearing loss, spectral resolution, and number of dead regions. For speech in noise, only a modest proportion of performance variance was explained by amount of hearing loss. In general, participants were wearing amplification of appropriate style and technology for their hearing loss, but the extent of assistive technology use was low. Subjective communication ratings depended on the listening situation, but in general, were similar to previously published data for adults with mild-to-moderate loss who did not wear hearing aids. Conclusions: The present data suggest that the range of abilities of an individual can be more fully captured with comprehensive testing. Such testing also offers an opportunity for informed counseling regarding realistic expectations for hearing aid use and the availability of hearing assistive technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)764-779
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Hearing Loss
Hearing Aids
Aptitude
Self-Help Devices
Hearing
Communication
Bilateral Hearing Loss
Speech Perception
Cochlea
Noise
Counseling
Research Design
History
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Growth

Keywords

  • Auditory rehabilitation
  • Hearing science
  • Speech perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

The characteristics of adults with severe hearing loss. / Souza, Pamela; Hoover, Eric; Blackburn, Michael; Gallun, Frederick.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 29, No. 8, 01.09.2018, p. 764-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Souza, Pamela ; Hoover, Eric ; Blackburn, Michael ; Gallun, Frederick. / The characteristics of adults with severe hearing loss. In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 8. pp. 764-779.
@article{30e28e35759a4f8fad18e8d7f468e779,
title = "The characteristics of adults with severe hearing loss",
abstract = "Background: Severe hearing loss impairs communication in a wide range of listening environments. However, we lack data as to the specific objective and subjective abilities of listeners with severe hearing loss. Insight into those abilities may inform treatment choices. Purpose: The primary goal was to describe the audiometric profiles, spectral resolution ability, and objective and subjective speech perception of a sample of adult listeners with severe hearing loss, and to consider the relationships among those measures. We also considered the typical fitting received by individuals with severe loss, in terms of hearing aid style, electroacoustic characteristics, and features, as well as supplementary device use. Research Design: A within-subjects design was used. Study Sample: Participants included 36 adults aged 54-93 yr with unilateral or bilateral severe hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: Testing included a full hearing and hearing aid history; audiometric evaluation; loudness growth and dynamic range; spectral resolution; assessment of cochlear dead regions; objective and subjective assessment of speech recognition; and electroacoustic evaluation of current hearing aids. Regression models were used to analyze relationships between hearing loss, spectral resolution, and speech recognition. Results: For speech in quiet, 60{\%} of the variance was approximately equally accounted for by amount of hearing loss, spectral resolution, and number of dead regions. For speech in noise, only a modest proportion of performance variance was explained by amount of hearing loss. In general, participants were wearing amplification of appropriate style and technology for their hearing loss, but the extent of assistive technology use was low. Subjective communication ratings depended on the listening situation, but in general, were similar to previously published data for adults with mild-to-moderate loss who did not wear hearing aids. Conclusions: The present data suggest that the range of abilities of an individual can be more fully captured with comprehensive testing. Such testing also offers an opportunity for informed counseling regarding realistic expectations for hearing aid use and the availability of hearing assistive technology.",
keywords = "Auditory rehabilitation, Hearing science, Speech perception",
author = "Pamela Souza and Eric Hoover and Michael Blackburn and Frederick Gallun",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3766/jaaa.17050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "764--779",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The characteristics of adults with severe hearing loss

AU - Souza, Pamela

AU - Hoover, Eric

AU - Blackburn, Michael

AU - Gallun, Frederick

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Background: Severe hearing loss impairs communication in a wide range of listening environments. However, we lack data as to the specific objective and subjective abilities of listeners with severe hearing loss. Insight into those abilities may inform treatment choices. Purpose: The primary goal was to describe the audiometric profiles, spectral resolution ability, and objective and subjective speech perception of a sample of adult listeners with severe hearing loss, and to consider the relationships among those measures. We also considered the typical fitting received by individuals with severe loss, in terms of hearing aid style, electroacoustic characteristics, and features, as well as supplementary device use. Research Design: A within-subjects design was used. Study Sample: Participants included 36 adults aged 54-93 yr with unilateral or bilateral severe hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: Testing included a full hearing and hearing aid history; audiometric evaluation; loudness growth and dynamic range; spectral resolution; assessment of cochlear dead regions; objective and subjective assessment of speech recognition; and electroacoustic evaluation of current hearing aids. Regression models were used to analyze relationships between hearing loss, spectral resolution, and speech recognition. Results: For speech in quiet, 60% of the variance was approximately equally accounted for by amount of hearing loss, spectral resolution, and number of dead regions. For speech in noise, only a modest proportion of performance variance was explained by amount of hearing loss. In general, participants were wearing amplification of appropriate style and technology for their hearing loss, but the extent of assistive technology use was low. Subjective communication ratings depended on the listening situation, but in general, were similar to previously published data for adults with mild-to-moderate loss who did not wear hearing aids. Conclusions: The present data suggest that the range of abilities of an individual can be more fully captured with comprehensive testing. Such testing also offers an opportunity for informed counseling regarding realistic expectations for hearing aid use and the availability of hearing assistive technology.

AB - Background: Severe hearing loss impairs communication in a wide range of listening environments. However, we lack data as to the specific objective and subjective abilities of listeners with severe hearing loss. Insight into those abilities may inform treatment choices. Purpose: The primary goal was to describe the audiometric profiles, spectral resolution ability, and objective and subjective speech perception of a sample of adult listeners with severe hearing loss, and to consider the relationships among those measures. We also considered the typical fitting received by individuals with severe loss, in terms of hearing aid style, electroacoustic characteristics, and features, as well as supplementary device use. Research Design: A within-subjects design was used. Study Sample: Participants included 36 adults aged 54-93 yr with unilateral or bilateral severe hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: Testing included a full hearing and hearing aid history; audiometric evaluation; loudness growth and dynamic range; spectral resolution; assessment of cochlear dead regions; objective and subjective assessment of speech recognition; and electroacoustic evaluation of current hearing aids. Regression models were used to analyze relationships between hearing loss, spectral resolution, and speech recognition. Results: For speech in quiet, 60% of the variance was approximately equally accounted for by amount of hearing loss, spectral resolution, and number of dead regions. For speech in noise, only a modest proportion of performance variance was explained by amount of hearing loss. In general, participants were wearing amplification of appropriate style and technology for their hearing loss, but the extent of assistive technology use was low. Subjective communication ratings depended on the listening situation, but in general, were similar to previously published data for adults with mild-to-moderate loss who did not wear hearing aids. Conclusions: The present data suggest that the range of abilities of an individual can be more fully captured with comprehensive testing. Such testing also offers an opportunity for informed counseling regarding realistic expectations for hearing aid use and the availability of hearing assistive technology.

KW - Auditory rehabilitation

KW - Hearing science

KW - Speech perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053548891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053548891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3766/jaaa.17050

DO - 10.3766/jaaa.17050

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 764

EP - 779

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 8

ER -