The capitalist composition of organic

The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture

Patricia Allen, Martin Kovach

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

193 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Observers of agriculture and the environment have noted the recent remarkable growth of the organic products industry. Is it possible for this growth in the organics market to contribute to progressive environmental and social goals? From the perspective of green consumerism, the organics market is a powerful engine for positive change because it promotes greater environmental awareness and responsibility among producers and consumers alike. Given its environmental benefits and its ability to use and alter capitalist markets, organic agriculture is currently a positive force for environmentalism. Still, there are contradictions between organic ideals and practice - e.g., the reductionism of organic standards, the limitations of private organic certification, and the widespread practice of input-substitution - that emerge through the dynamics of the capitalist market. As the market matures, these contradictions will increasingly undermine the very environmental benefits that are the foundation of organic agriculture. Fundamental change, therefore, is not likely to occur through the market alone. There are ways, however, that the organics market could contribute to a broader movement leading to collective action. For instance, the organics market tends to undermine commodity fetishism in the agrifood system, thereby strengthening civil society. In addition, the market provides space and resources for social movement activity, such as in the struggle over the National Organic Standards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-232
Number of pages12
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

organic production
markets
ecosystem services
producer responsibility
organic certification
collective action
consumer behavior
engines
products and commodities
agriculture
industry

Keywords

  • Commodity fetishism
  • Ecological soundness
  • Green consumerism
  • Input substitution
  • National Organic Standards
  • Organic agriculture
  • Organic agriculture - environmental benefits
  • Organic agriculture - scientific justification
  • Organic agriculture growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

The capitalist composition of organic : The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture. / Allen, Patricia; Kovach, Martin.

In: Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.01.2000, p. 221-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{ec2281d4304c436aa13832d5f9cc590e,
title = "The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture",
abstract = "Observers of agriculture and the environment have noted the recent remarkable growth of the organic products industry. Is it possible for this growth in the organics market to contribute to progressive environmental and social goals? From the perspective of green consumerism, the organics market is a powerful engine for positive change because it promotes greater environmental awareness and responsibility among producers and consumers alike. Given its environmental benefits and its ability to use and alter capitalist markets, organic agriculture is currently a positive force for environmentalism. Still, there are contradictions between organic ideals and practice - e.g., the reductionism of organic standards, the limitations of private organic certification, and the widespread practice of input-substitution - that emerge through the dynamics of the capitalist market. As the market matures, these contradictions will increasingly undermine the very environmental benefits that are the foundation of organic agriculture. Fundamental change, therefore, is not likely to occur through the market alone. There are ways, however, that the organics market could contribute to a broader movement leading to collective action. For instance, the organics market tends to undermine commodity fetishism in the agrifood system, thereby strengthening civil society. In addition, the market provides space and resources for social movement activity, such as in the struggle over the National Organic Standards.",
keywords = "Commodity fetishism, Ecological soundness, Green consumerism, Input substitution, National Organic Standards, Organic agriculture, Organic agriculture - environmental benefits, Organic agriculture - scientific justification, Organic agriculture growth",
author = "Patricia Allen and Martin Kovach",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1007640506965",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "221--232",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The capitalist composition of organic

T2 - The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture

AU - Allen, Patricia

AU - Kovach, Martin

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Observers of agriculture and the environment have noted the recent remarkable growth of the organic products industry. Is it possible for this growth in the organics market to contribute to progressive environmental and social goals? From the perspective of green consumerism, the organics market is a powerful engine for positive change because it promotes greater environmental awareness and responsibility among producers and consumers alike. Given its environmental benefits and its ability to use and alter capitalist markets, organic agriculture is currently a positive force for environmentalism. Still, there are contradictions between organic ideals and practice - e.g., the reductionism of organic standards, the limitations of private organic certification, and the widespread practice of input-substitution - that emerge through the dynamics of the capitalist market. As the market matures, these contradictions will increasingly undermine the very environmental benefits that are the foundation of organic agriculture. Fundamental change, therefore, is not likely to occur through the market alone. There are ways, however, that the organics market could contribute to a broader movement leading to collective action. For instance, the organics market tends to undermine commodity fetishism in the agrifood system, thereby strengthening civil society. In addition, the market provides space and resources for social movement activity, such as in the struggle over the National Organic Standards.

AB - Observers of agriculture and the environment have noted the recent remarkable growth of the organic products industry. Is it possible for this growth in the organics market to contribute to progressive environmental and social goals? From the perspective of green consumerism, the organics market is a powerful engine for positive change because it promotes greater environmental awareness and responsibility among producers and consumers alike. Given its environmental benefits and its ability to use and alter capitalist markets, organic agriculture is currently a positive force for environmentalism. Still, there are contradictions between organic ideals and practice - e.g., the reductionism of organic standards, the limitations of private organic certification, and the widespread practice of input-substitution - that emerge through the dynamics of the capitalist market. As the market matures, these contradictions will increasingly undermine the very environmental benefits that are the foundation of organic agriculture. Fundamental change, therefore, is not likely to occur through the market alone. There are ways, however, that the organics market could contribute to a broader movement leading to collective action. For instance, the organics market tends to undermine commodity fetishism in the agrifood system, thereby strengthening civil society. In addition, the market provides space and resources for social movement activity, such as in the struggle over the National Organic Standards.

KW - Commodity fetishism

KW - Ecological soundness

KW - Green consumerism

KW - Input substitution

KW - National Organic Standards

KW - Organic agriculture

KW - Organic agriculture - environmental benefits

KW - Organic agriculture - scientific justification

KW - Organic agriculture growth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009793865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009793865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1007640506965

DO - 10.1023/A:1007640506965

M3 - Review article

VL - 17

SP - 221

EP - 232

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 3

ER -