The aborted early history of the translabyrinthine approach: A victim of suppression or technical prematurity?

Anh Nguyen-Huynh, Robert K. Jackler, Markus Pfister, Jeff Tseng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reasons translabyrinthine (TL) approach to acoustic neuroma, initially attempted in 1911, became relegated to obscurity for nearly half a century. STUDY DESIGN: A scholarly review of more than 40 publications in German and English from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. LITERATURE SUMMARY: Surgeons who first contemplated approaching the cerebellopontine angle recognized that the shortest route from the surface was through the petrous bone. In the late 19th century, otologic surgeons devised numerous procedures to deal with infection in and around the semicircular canals. This familiarity led R. Panse of Dresden to propose (but not actually perform) a TL approach (1904). F.H. Quix of Utrecht performed the first pure TL approach (1911), but others before him had used petrosectomy to augment the suboccipital approach. Subsequent TL attempts by other surgeons met with variable results. Devastating criticism of the method was proffered by leading acoustic neuroma surgeons of the day such as H. Cushing (1921) and W. Dandy (1925). The most important criticisms were that the approach provided only a deep and narrow field of action, was surrounded by major vascular structures, and led to great difficulty with cerebrospinal fluid leakage. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: The literature on this subject is replete with erroneous citations. Panse is often miscited as having performed the first surgery. It has also become traditional to give Quix great credit, even though his procedure failed to remove much of the tumor. Poor outcome and intense criticism led surgeons to abandon the TL approach until W.F. House, armed with operating microscope and high-speed drill, successfully resurrected it in the 1960s. He concisely summarizes the pioneers' efforts: "They had the ideas and desire, but not the technical tools."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-279
Number of pages11
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

History
Acoustic Neuroma
Petrous Bone
Cerebellopontine Angle
Semicircular Canals
Blood Vessels
Publications
Surgeons
Infection
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Acoustic neuroma
  • Translabyrinthine craniotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The aborted early history of the translabyrinthine approach : A victim of suppression or technical prematurity? / Nguyen-Huynh, Anh; Jackler, Robert K.; Pfister, Markus; Tseng, Jeff.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 28, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 269-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen-Huynh, Anh ; Jackler, Robert K. ; Pfister, Markus ; Tseng, Jeff. / The aborted early history of the translabyrinthine approach : A victim of suppression or technical prematurity?. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2007 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 269-279.
@article{f33e28d1e4014bf7b24ad70b9aa5914e,
title = "The aborted early history of the translabyrinthine approach: A victim of suppression or technical prematurity?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reasons translabyrinthine (TL) approach to acoustic neuroma, initially attempted in 1911, became relegated to obscurity for nearly half a century. STUDY DESIGN: A scholarly review of more than 40 publications in German and English from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. LITERATURE SUMMARY: Surgeons who first contemplated approaching the cerebellopontine angle recognized that the shortest route from the surface was through the petrous bone. In the late 19th century, otologic surgeons devised numerous procedures to deal with infection in and around the semicircular canals. This familiarity led R. Panse of Dresden to propose (but not actually perform) a TL approach (1904). F.H. Quix of Utrecht performed the first pure TL approach (1911), but others before him had used petrosectomy to augment the suboccipital approach. Subsequent TL attempts by other surgeons met with variable results. Devastating criticism of the method was proffered by leading acoustic neuroma surgeons of the day such as H. Cushing (1921) and W. Dandy (1925). The most important criticisms were that the approach provided only a deep and narrow field of action, was surrounded by major vascular structures, and led to great difficulty with cerebrospinal fluid leakage. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: The literature on this subject is replete with erroneous citations. Panse is often miscited as having performed the first surgery. It has also become traditional to give Quix great credit, even though his procedure failed to remove much of the tumor. Poor outcome and intense criticism led surgeons to abandon the TL approach until W.F. House, armed with operating microscope and high-speed drill, successfully resurrected it in the 1960s. He concisely summarizes the pioneers' efforts: {"}They had the ideas and desire, but not the technical tools.{"}",
keywords = "Acoustic neuroma, Translabyrinthine craniotomy",
author = "Anh Nguyen-Huynh and Jackler, {Robert K.} and Markus Pfister and Jeff Tseng",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e31802b3264",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "269--279",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The aborted early history of the translabyrinthine approach

T2 - A victim of suppression or technical prematurity?

AU - Nguyen-Huynh, Anh

AU - Jackler, Robert K.

AU - Pfister, Markus

AU - Tseng, Jeff

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reasons translabyrinthine (TL) approach to acoustic neuroma, initially attempted in 1911, became relegated to obscurity for nearly half a century. STUDY DESIGN: A scholarly review of more than 40 publications in German and English from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. LITERATURE SUMMARY: Surgeons who first contemplated approaching the cerebellopontine angle recognized that the shortest route from the surface was through the petrous bone. In the late 19th century, otologic surgeons devised numerous procedures to deal with infection in and around the semicircular canals. This familiarity led R. Panse of Dresden to propose (but not actually perform) a TL approach (1904). F.H. Quix of Utrecht performed the first pure TL approach (1911), but others before him had used petrosectomy to augment the suboccipital approach. Subsequent TL attempts by other surgeons met with variable results. Devastating criticism of the method was proffered by leading acoustic neuroma surgeons of the day such as H. Cushing (1921) and W. Dandy (1925). The most important criticisms were that the approach provided only a deep and narrow field of action, was surrounded by major vascular structures, and led to great difficulty with cerebrospinal fluid leakage. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: The literature on this subject is replete with erroneous citations. Panse is often miscited as having performed the first surgery. It has also become traditional to give Quix great credit, even though his procedure failed to remove much of the tumor. Poor outcome and intense criticism led surgeons to abandon the TL approach until W.F. House, armed with operating microscope and high-speed drill, successfully resurrected it in the 1960s. He concisely summarizes the pioneers' efforts: "They had the ideas and desire, but not the technical tools."

AB - OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reasons translabyrinthine (TL) approach to acoustic neuroma, initially attempted in 1911, became relegated to obscurity for nearly half a century. STUDY DESIGN: A scholarly review of more than 40 publications in German and English from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. LITERATURE SUMMARY: Surgeons who first contemplated approaching the cerebellopontine angle recognized that the shortest route from the surface was through the petrous bone. In the late 19th century, otologic surgeons devised numerous procedures to deal with infection in and around the semicircular canals. This familiarity led R. Panse of Dresden to propose (but not actually perform) a TL approach (1904). F.H. Quix of Utrecht performed the first pure TL approach (1911), but others before him had used petrosectomy to augment the suboccipital approach. Subsequent TL attempts by other surgeons met with variable results. Devastating criticism of the method was proffered by leading acoustic neuroma surgeons of the day such as H. Cushing (1921) and W. Dandy (1925). The most important criticisms were that the approach provided only a deep and narrow field of action, was surrounded by major vascular structures, and led to great difficulty with cerebrospinal fluid leakage. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: The literature on this subject is replete with erroneous citations. Panse is often miscited as having performed the first surgery. It has also become traditional to give Quix great credit, even though his procedure failed to remove much of the tumor. Poor outcome and intense criticism led surgeons to abandon the TL approach until W.F. House, armed with operating microscope and high-speed drill, successfully resurrected it in the 1960s. He concisely summarizes the pioneers' efforts: "They had the ideas and desire, but not the technical tools."

KW - Acoustic neuroma

KW - Translabyrinthine craniotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846594342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846594342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31802b3264

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31802b3264

M3 - Article

C2 - 17255895

AN - SCOPUS:33846594342

VL - 28

SP - 269

EP - 279

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 2

ER -