Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli

Frederick Gallun, Christine R. Mason, Gerald Kidd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A listener presented with two speech signals must at times sacrifice the processing of one signal in order to understand the other. This study was designed to distinguish costs related to interference from a second signal (selective attention) from costs related to performing two tasks simultaneously (divided attention). Listeners presented with two processed speech-in-noise stimuli, one to each ear, either (1) identified keywords in both or (2) identified keywords in one and detected the presence of speech in the other. Listeners either knew which ear to report in advance (single task) or were cued afterward (partial-report dual task). When the dual task required two identification judgments, performance suffered relative to the single-task condition (as measured by percent correct judgments). Two different tasks (identification for one stimulus and detection for the other) resulted in much smaller reductions in performance when the cue came afterward. We concluded that the degree to which listeners can simultaneously process dichotic speech stimuli seems to depend not only on the amount of interference between the two stimuli, but also on whether there is competition for limited processing resources. We suggest several specific hypotheses as to the structural mechanisms that could constitute these limited resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)757-771
Number of pages15
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume69
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

listener
stimulus
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
Ear
interference
resources
performance
Cues
Noise
Stimulus
Costs
Listeners
Auditory Stimuli
Key Words
Dual Task
Interference
Resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli. / Gallun, Frederick; Mason, Christine R.; Kidd, Gerald.

In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 69, No. 5, 07.2007, p. 757-771.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gallun, Frederick ; Mason, Christine R. ; Kidd, Gerald. / Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli. In: Perception and Psychophysics. 2007 ; Vol. 69, No. 5. pp. 757-771.
@article{6516221c4b5c4881b517da88e9c225d9,
title = "Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli",
abstract = "A listener presented with two speech signals must at times sacrifice the processing of one signal in order to understand the other. This study was designed to distinguish costs related to interference from a second signal (selective attention) from costs related to performing two tasks simultaneously (divided attention). Listeners presented with two processed speech-in-noise stimuli, one to each ear, either (1) identified keywords in both or (2) identified keywords in one and detected the presence of speech in the other. Listeners either knew which ear to report in advance (single task) or were cued afterward (partial-report dual task). When the dual task required two identification judgments, performance suffered relative to the single-task condition (as measured by percent correct judgments). Two different tasks (identification for one stimulus and detection for the other) resulted in much smaller reductions in performance when the cue came afterward. We concluded that the degree to which listeners can simultaneously process dichotic speech stimuli seems to depend not only on the amount of interference between the two stimuli, but also on whether there is competition for limited processing resources. We suggest several specific hypotheses as to the structural mechanisms that could constitute these limited resources.",
author = "Frederick Gallun and Mason, {Christine R.} and Gerald Kidd",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "757--771",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli

AU - Gallun, Frederick

AU - Mason, Christine R.

AU - Kidd, Gerald

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - A listener presented with two speech signals must at times sacrifice the processing of one signal in order to understand the other. This study was designed to distinguish costs related to interference from a second signal (selective attention) from costs related to performing two tasks simultaneously (divided attention). Listeners presented with two processed speech-in-noise stimuli, one to each ear, either (1) identified keywords in both or (2) identified keywords in one and detected the presence of speech in the other. Listeners either knew which ear to report in advance (single task) or were cued afterward (partial-report dual task). When the dual task required two identification judgments, performance suffered relative to the single-task condition (as measured by percent correct judgments). Two different tasks (identification for one stimulus and detection for the other) resulted in much smaller reductions in performance when the cue came afterward. We concluded that the degree to which listeners can simultaneously process dichotic speech stimuli seems to depend not only on the amount of interference between the two stimuli, but also on whether there is competition for limited processing resources. We suggest several specific hypotheses as to the structural mechanisms that could constitute these limited resources.

AB - A listener presented with two speech signals must at times sacrifice the processing of one signal in order to understand the other. This study was designed to distinguish costs related to interference from a second signal (selective attention) from costs related to performing two tasks simultaneously (divided attention). Listeners presented with two processed speech-in-noise stimuli, one to each ear, either (1) identified keywords in both or (2) identified keywords in one and detected the presence of speech in the other. Listeners either knew which ear to report in advance (single task) or were cued afterward (partial-report dual task). When the dual task required two identification judgments, performance suffered relative to the single-task condition (as measured by percent correct judgments). Two different tasks (identification for one stimulus and detection for the other) resulted in much smaller reductions in performance when the cue came afterward. We concluded that the degree to which listeners can simultaneously process dichotic speech stimuli seems to depend not only on the amount of interference between the two stimuli, but also on whether there is competition for limited processing resources. We suggest several specific hypotheses as to the structural mechanisms that could constitute these limited resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34648831914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34648831914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17929698

AN - SCOPUS:34648831914

VL - 69

SP - 757

EP - 771

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 5

ER -