Superiority of moderate control of hyperglycemia to tight control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Castigliano Bhamidipati, Damien J. Lapar, George J. Stukenborg, Christine C. Morrison, John A. Kern, Irving L. Kron, Gorav Ailawadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Although consensus in cardiac surgery supports tight control of perioperative hyperglycemia (glucose <120 mg/dL), recent studies in critical care suggest moderate glycemic control may be superior. We sought to determine whether tight control or moderate glycemic control is optimal after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: From 1995 to 2008, a total of 4658 patients with known diabetes or perioperative hyperglycemia (preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin ≥8 or postoperative serum glucose >126 mg/dL) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution. Patients were stratified into 3 postoperative glycemic groups: tight (≤126 mg/dL), moderate (127-179 mg/dL), and liberal (≥180 mg/dL). Preoperative risk factors, glycemic management, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Operative mortality was 2.5% (119/4658); major complication rate was 12.5% (581/4658). Relative to moderate group, more patients in tight group had preoperative renal failure (tight 16.4%, 22/134, moderate 8.3%, 232/2785, P = .001) and underwent emergent operations (tight 5.2%, 7/134, moderate 1.9%, 52/2785, P = .007); however, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted mortality risk was lower in tight group (P < .001). Moderate group had lowest mortality (tight 2.9%, 4/134, moderate 2.0%, 56/2785, liberal 3.4%, 59/1739, P = .02) and incidence of major complications (tight 19.4%, 26/134, moderate 11.1%, 308/2785, liberate 14.2%, 247/1739, P < .001). Risk-adjusted major complication incidence (adjusted odds ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.87) and mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.83) were lower with moderate glucose control than with tight or liberal management. Conclusions: Moderate glycemic control was superior to tight glycemic control, with decreased mortality and major complications, and may be ideal for patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-551
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume141
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Hyperglycemia
Mortality
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Glucose
Incidence
Thoracic Surgery
Renal Insufficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Superiority of moderate control of hyperglycemia to tight control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. / Bhamidipati, Castigliano; Lapar, Damien J.; Stukenborg, George J.; Morrison, Christine C.; Kern, John A.; Kron, Irving L.; Ailawadi, Gorav.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 141, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 543-551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bhamidipati, Castigliano ; Lapar, Damien J. ; Stukenborg, George J. ; Morrison, Christine C. ; Kern, John A. ; Kron, Irving L. ; Ailawadi, Gorav. / Superiority of moderate control of hyperglycemia to tight control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 141, No. 2. pp. 543-551.
@article{030e3506c7794f889468b902c889b4c6,
title = "Superiority of moderate control of hyperglycemia to tight control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting",
abstract = "Objective: Although consensus in cardiac surgery supports tight control of perioperative hyperglycemia (glucose <120 mg/dL), recent studies in critical care suggest moderate glycemic control may be superior. We sought to determine whether tight control or moderate glycemic control is optimal after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: From 1995 to 2008, a total of 4658 patients with known diabetes or perioperative hyperglycemia (preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin ≥8 or postoperative serum glucose >126 mg/dL) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution. Patients were stratified into 3 postoperative glycemic groups: tight (≤126 mg/dL), moderate (127-179 mg/dL), and liberal (≥180 mg/dL). Preoperative risk factors, glycemic management, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Operative mortality was 2.5{\%} (119/4658); major complication rate was 12.5{\%} (581/4658). Relative to moderate group, more patients in tight group had preoperative renal failure (tight 16.4{\%}, 22/134, moderate 8.3{\%}, 232/2785, P = .001) and underwent emergent operations (tight 5.2{\%}, 7/134, moderate 1.9{\%}, 52/2785, P = .007); however, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted mortality risk was lower in tight group (P < .001). Moderate group had lowest mortality (tight 2.9{\%}, 4/134, moderate 2.0{\%}, 56/2785, liberal 3.4{\%}, 59/1739, P = .02) and incidence of major complications (tight 19.4{\%}, 26/134, moderate 11.1{\%}, 308/2785, liberate 14.2{\%}, 247/1739, P < .001). Risk-adjusted major complication incidence (adjusted odds ratio 0.7, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.58-0.87) and mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.6, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.37-0.83) were lower with moderate glucose control than with tight or liberal management. Conclusions: Moderate glycemic control was superior to tight glycemic control, with decreased mortality and major complications, and may be ideal for patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.",
author = "Castigliano Bhamidipati and Lapar, {Damien J.} and Stukenborg, {George J.} and Morrison, {Christine C.} and Kern, {John A.} and Kron, {Irving L.} and Gorav Ailawadi",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "543--551",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Superiority of moderate control of hyperglycemia to tight control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

AU - Bhamidipati, Castigliano

AU - Lapar, Damien J.

AU - Stukenborg, George J.

AU - Morrison, Christine C.

AU - Kern, John A.

AU - Kron, Irving L.

AU - Ailawadi, Gorav

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Objective: Although consensus in cardiac surgery supports tight control of perioperative hyperglycemia (glucose <120 mg/dL), recent studies in critical care suggest moderate glycemic control may be superior. We sought to determine whether tight control or moderate glycemic control is optimal after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: From 1995 to 2008, a total of 4658 patients with known diabetes or perioperative hyperglycemia (preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin ≥8 or postoperative serum glucose >126 mg/dL) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution. Patients were stratified into 3 postoperative glycemic groups: tight (≤126 mg/dL), moderate (127-179 mg/dL), and liberal (≥180 mg/dL). Preoperative risk factors, glycemic management, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Operative mortality was 2.5% (119/4658); major complication rate was 12.5% (581/4658). Relative to moderate group, more patients in tight group had preoperative renal failure (tight 16.4%, 22/134, moderate 8.3%, 232/2785, P = .001) and underwent emergent operations (tight 5.2%, 7/134, moderate 1.9%, 52/2785, P = .007); however, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted mortality risk was lower in tight group (P < .001). Moderate group had lowest mortality (tight 2.9%, 4/134, moderate 2.0%, 56/2785, liberal 3.4%, 59/1739, P = .02) and incidence of major complications (tight 19.4%, 26/134, moderate 11.1%, 308/2785, liberate 14.2%, 247/1739, P < .001). Risk-adjusted major complication incidence (adjusted odds ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.87) and mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.83) were lower with moderate glucose control than with tight or liberal management. Conclusions: Moderate glycemic control was superior to tight glycemic control, with decreased mortality and major complications, and may be ideal for patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

AB - Objective: Although consensus in cardiac surgery supports tight control of perioperative hyperglycemia (glucose <120 mg/dL), recent studies in critical care suggest moderate glycemic control may be superior. We sought to determine whether tight control or moderate glycemic control is optimal after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: From 1995 to 2008, a total of 4658 patients with known diabetes or perioperative hyperglycemia (preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin ≥8 or postoperative serum glucose >126 mg/dL) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution. Patients were stratified into 3 postoperative glycemic groups: tight (≤126 mg/dL), moderate (127-179 mg/dL), and liberal (≥180 mg/dL). Preoperative risk factors, glycemic management, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Operative mortality was 2.5% (119/4658); major complication rate was 12.5% (581/4658). Relative to moderate group, more patients in tight group had preoperative renal failure (tight 16.4%, 22/134, moderate 8.3%, 232/2785, P = .001) and underwent emergent operations (tight 5.2%, 7/134, moderate 1.9%, 52/2785, P = .007); however, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted mortality risk was lower in tight group (P < .001). Moderate group had lowest mortality (tight 2.9%, 4/134, moderate 2.0%, 56/2785, liberal 3.4%, 59/1739, P = .02) and incidence of major complications (tight 19.4%, 26/134, moderate 11.1%, 308/2785, liberate 14.2%, 247/1739, P < .001). Risk-adjusted major complication incidence (adjusted odds ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.87) and mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.83) were lower with moderate glucose control than with tight or liberal management. Conclusions: Moderate glycemic control was superior to tight glycemic control, with decreased mortality and major complications, and may be ideal for patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751580552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751580552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 21163498

AN - SCOPUS:78751580552

VL - 141

SP - 543

EP - 551

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 2

ER -