SU‐GG‐J‐101

Investigation of Intrafractional Prostate Rotation and Its Effect on PTV Margin Evaluation

Q. xu, J. li, J. Fan, Y. Chen, James Tanyi, M. Hossain, L. Chen, B. Yang, C. ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The intrafractional prostate rotation has been rarely studied due to the limitation of real‐time imaging of the prostate during treatment. The Calypso 4D Localization System provides the capability of real‐time tracking of implanted transponders for prostate patients. Based on the transponder locations, intrafractional prostate rotation can be investigated to facilitate prostate PTV margin evaluation.Method and Materials: With three transponders implanted in the prostate, the system log file recorded intrafractional 3D coordinates of transponders for 10 fractions of 5 patients enrolled in the study. To minimize noise, the 3D coordinates were first downsampled following a size of 5 median filtering. Based on the transponder positions in the planning CT, the rotational and translational motion of the prostate was calculated using a point‐based algorithm. To check the CTV coverage for a particular fraction we overlapped the rotated prostate CTV with the PTV. Results: For 9 fractions, the maximum rotation angles around x (Lateral), y (SI) and z (AP) were 7°, 6° and 3°, respectively. Although the prostate may not rotate around all 3 axes simultaneously we tested this worst case scenario and found that the CTV was still covered by the PTV when the prostate rotated by the maximum angles. For one fraction, large rotational angles were observed (39.4°, −22° and 12° in x, y and z) along with large transponder distance variations (>1cm). In this case, 20.5% of the CTV was outside of the PTV. The rotational angles for this patient need further investigation since large transponder migration may affect the rotation calculation significantly as we reported before. Conclusion: For most cases, the prostate exhibits relatively small intrafractional rotations and the CTV is covered by the PTV. For patients with larger transponder migration, a CBCT or other imaging modality is recommended for further investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Prostate
Noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐GG‐J‐101 : Investigation of Intrafractional Prostate Rotation and Its Effect on PTV Margin Evaluation. / xu, Q.; li, J.; Fan, J.; Chen, Y.; Tanyi, James; Hossain, M.; Chen, L.; Yang, B.; ma, C.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

xu, Q. ; li, J. ; Fan, J. ; Chen, Y. ; Tanyi, James ; Hossain, M. ; Chen, L. ; Yang, B. ; ma, C. / SU‐GG‐J‐101 : Investigation of Intrafractional Prostate Rotation and Its Effect on PTV Margin Evaluation. In: Medical Physics. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 6.
@article{215decb8737842e9bc43b57af04207c6,
title = "SU‐GG‐J‐101: Investigation of Intrafractional Prostate Rotation and Its Effect on PTV Margin Evaluation",
abstract = "Purpose: The intrafractional prostate rotation has been rarely studied due to the limitation of real‐time imaging of the prostate during treatment. The Calypso 4D Localization System provides the capability of real‐time tracking of implanted transponders for prostate patients. Based on the transponder locations, intrafractional prostate rotation can be investigated to facilitate prostate PTV margin evaluation.Method and Materials: With three transponders implanted in the prostate, the system log file recorded intrafractional 3D coordinates of transponders for 10 fractions of 5 patients enrolled in the study. To minimize noise, the 3D coordinates were first downsampled following a size of 5 median filtering. Based on the transponder positions in the planning CT, the rotational and translational motion of the prostate was calculated using a point‐based algorithm. To check the CTV coverage for a particular fraction we overlapped the rotated prostate CTV with the PTV. Results: For 9 fractions, the maximum rotation angles around x (Lateral), y (SI) and z (AP) were 7°, 6° and 3°, respectively. Although the prostate may not rotate around all 3 axes simultaneously we tested this worst case scenario and found that the CTV was still covered by the PTV when the prostate rotated by the maximum angles. For one fraction, large rotational angles were observed (39.4°, −22° and 12° in x, y and z) along with large transponder distance variations (>1cm). In this case, 20.5{\%} of the CTV was outside of the PTV. The rotational angles for this patient need further investigation since large transponder migration may affect the rotation calculation significantly as we reported before. Conclusion: For most cases, the prostate exhibits relatively small intrafractional rotations and the CTV is covered by the PTV. For patients with larger transponder migration, a CBCT or other imaging modality is recommended for further investigation.",
author = "Q. xu and J. li and J. Fan and Y. Chen and James Tanyi and M. Hossain and L. Chen and B. Yang and C. ma",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1118/1.3468325",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐J‐101

T2 - Investigation of Intrafractional Prostate Rotation and Its Effect on PTV Margin Evaluation

AU - xu, Q.

AU - li, J.

AU - Fan, J.

AU - Chen, Y.

AU - Tanyi, James

AU - Hossain, M.

AU - Chen, L.

AU - Yang, B.

AU - ma, C.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose: The intrafractional prostate rotation has been rarely studied due to the limitation of real‐time imaging of the prostate during treatment. The Calypso 4D Localization System provides the capability of real‐time tracking of implanted transponders for prostate patients. Based on the transponder locations, intrafractional prostate rotation can be investigated to facilitate prostate PTV margin evaluation.Method and Materials: With three transponders implanted in the prostate, the system log file recorded intrafractional 3D coordinates of transponders for 10 fractions of 5 patients enrolled in the study. To minimize noise, the 3D coordinates were first downsampled following a size of 5 median filtering. Based on the transponder positions in the planning CT, the rotational and translational motion of the prostate was calculated using a point‐based algorithm. To check the CTV coverage for a particular fraction we overlapped the rotated prostate CTV with the PTV. Results: For 9 fractions, the maximum rotation angles around x (Lateral), y (SI) and z (AP) were 7°, 6° and 3°, respectively. Although the prostate may not rotate around all 3 axes simultaneously we tested this worst case scenario and found that the CTV was still covered by the PTV when the prostate rotated by the maximum angles. For one fraction, large rotational angles were observed (39.4°, −22° and 12° in x, y and z) along with large transponder distance variations (>1cm). In this case, 20.5% of the CTV was outside of the PTV. The rotational angles for this patient need further investigation since large transponder migration may affect the rotation calculation significantly as we reported before. Conclusion: For most cases, the prostate exhibits relatively small intrafractional rotations and the CTV is covered by the PTV. For patients with larger transponder migration, a CBCT or other imaging modality is recommended for further investigation.

AB - Purpose: The intrafractional prostate rotation has been rarely studied due to the limitation of real‐time imaging of the prostate during treatment. The Calypso 4D Localization System provides the capability of real‐time tracking of implanted transponders for prostate patients. Based on the transponder locations, intrafractional prostate rotation can be investigated to facilitate prostate PTV margin evaluation.Method and Materials: With three transponders implanted in the prostate, the system log file recorded intrafractional 3D coordinates of transponders for 10 fractions of 5 patients enrolled in the study. To minimize noise, the 3D coordinates were first downsampled following a size of 5 median filtering. Based on the transponder positions in the planning CT, the rotational and translational motion of the prostate was calculated using a point‐based algorithm. To check the CTV coverage for a particular fraction we overlapped the rotated prostate CTV with the PTV. Results: For 9 fractions, the maximum rotation angles around x (Lateral), y (SI) and z (AP) were 7°, 6° and 3°, respectively. Although the prostate may not rotate around all 3 axes simultaneously we tested this worst case scenario and found that the CTV was still covered by the PTV when the prostate rotated by the maximum angles. For one fraction, large rotational angles were observed (39.4°, −22° and 12° in x, y and z) along with large transponder distance variations (>1cm). In this case, 20.5% of the CTV was outside of the PTV. The rotational angles for this patient need further investigation since large transponder migration may affect the rotation calculation significantly as we reported before. Conclusion: For most cases, the prostate exhibits relatively small intrafractional rotations and the CTV is covered by the PTV. For patients with larger transponder migration, a CBCT or other imaging modality is recommended for further investigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863624636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863624636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3468325

DO - 10.1118/1.3468325

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -