Success breeds success: Authorship distribution in the red Journal, 1975-2011

Emma Holliday, Clifton David Fuller, Lynn D. Wilson, Charles Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Publication analysis has value in evaluating the mechanics of academic efforts in specific scientific communities. The specific aim of this study was to evaluate whether established bibliometric patterns seen in other academic fields were likewise observed in radiation oncology publication parameters. Methods and Materials: We used a commercial bibliographic database to analyze all publications in Red Journal, or International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (IJROBP), the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO), and Radiology (Rad) between January 1, 1975 and May 18, 2011. Power-law (Lotka's law or 1/n2) conformance was assessed. Curve fit analysis was then performed. Results: In all 4 journals, a total of 219,476 authors were responsible for 62,232 articles. Of those, 79,810 authors published 13,772 articles in IJROBP, with 79,446/16,707 authors/articles in NEJM, 106,984/11,920 authors/articles in JCO and 90,325/19,745 authors/articles in Rad. The mean ± standard deviation of authors per publication was 5.74 ± 4.61 overall. There were 5.8 ± 3.53, 4.8 ± 5.7, 8.9 ± 3.53, and 4.6 ± 2.8 authors per article in IJROBP, NEJM, JCO, and Rad, respectively (P2.02 of those publishing 1 article in IJROBP, 1/n2.52 in NEJM, 1/n1.97 in JCO, and 1/n2.16 in Rad. Conclusions: Bibliometric analysis shows that authorship distributions in IJROBP approximate those of the scientific literature in comparable scientific journals. Our results suggest that the majority of publications in the field of radiation oncology are produced by a small but highly productive group of authors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-28
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Authorship
Radiation Oncology
Radiobiology
Physics
New England
Medical Oncology
Publications
Radiology
Medicine
Bibliometrics
New England (US)
biology
radiology
medicine
radiation
Bibliographic Databases
Literature
physics
Mechanics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Success breeds success : Authorship distribution in the red Journal, 1975-2011. / Holliday, Emma; Fuller, Clifton David; Wilson, Lynn D.; Thomas, Charles.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 85, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 23-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5900880346f6484abc22576ecaa5011a,
title = "Success breeds success: Authorship distribution in the red Journal, 1975-2011",
abstract = "Purpose: Publication analysis has value in evaluating the mechanics of academic efforts in specific scientific communities. The specific aim of this study was to evaluate whether established bibliometric patterns seen in other academic fields were likewise observed in radiation oncology publication parameters. Methods and Materials: We used a commercial bibliographic database to analyze all publications in Red Journal, or International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (IJROBP), the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO), and Radiology (Rad) between January 1, 1975 and May 18, 2011. Power-law (Lotka's law or 1/n2) conformance was assessed. Curve fit analysis was then performed. Results: In all 4 journals, a total of 219,476 authors were responsible for 62,232 articles. Of those, 79,810 authors published 13,772 articles in IJROBP, with 79,446/16,707 authors/articles in NEJM, 106,984/11,920 authors/articles in JCO and 90,325/19,745 authors/articles in Rad. The mean ± standard deviation of authors per publication was 5.74 ± 4.61 overall. There were 5.8 ± 3.53, 4.8 ± 5.7, 8.9 ± 3.53, and 4.6 ± 2.8 authors per article in IJROBP, NEJM, JCO, and Rad, respectively (P2.02 of those publishing 1 article in IJROBP, 1/n2.52 in NEJM, 1/n1.97 in JCO, and 1/n2.16 in Rad. Conclusions: Bibliometric analysis shows that authorship distributions in IJROBP approximate those of the scientific literature in comparable scientific journals. Our results suggest that the majority of publications in the field of radiation oncology are produced by a small but highly productive group of authors.",
author = "Emma Holliday and Fuller, {Clifton David} and Wilson, {Lynn D.} and Charles Thomas",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "23--28",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Success breeds success

T2 - Authorship distribution in the red Journal, 1975-2011

AU - Holliday, Emma

AU - Fuller, Clifton David

AU - Wilson, Lynn D.

AU - Thomas, Charles

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Publication analysis has value in evaluating the mechanics of academic efforts in specific scientific communities. The specific aim of this study was to evaluate whether established bibliometric patterns seen in other academic fields were likewise observed in radiation oncology publication parameters. Methods and Materials: We used a commercial bibliographic database to analyze all publications in Red Journal, or International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (IJROBP), the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO), and Radiology (Rad) between January 1, 1975 and May 18, 2011. Power-law (Lotka's law or 1/n2) conformance was assessed. Curve fit analysis was then performed. Results: In all 4 journals, a total of 219,476 authors were responsible for 62,232 articles. Of those, 79,810 authors published 13,772 articles in IJROBP, with 79,446/16,707 authors/articles in NEJM, 106,984/11,920 authors/articles in JCO and 90,325/19,745 authors/articles in Rad. The mean ± standard deviation of authors per publication was 5.74 ± 4.61 overall. There were 5.8 ± 3.53, 4.8 ± 5.7, 8.9 ± 3.53, and 4.6 ± 2.8 authors per article in IJROBP, NEJM, JCO, and Rad, respectively (P2.02 of those publishing 1 article in IJROBP, 1/n2.52 in NEJM, 1/n1.97 in JCO, and 1/n2.16 in Rad. Conclusions: Bibliometric analysis shows that authorship distributions in IJROBP approximate those of the scientific literature in comparable scientific journals. Our results suggest that the majority of publications in the field of radiation oncology are produced by a small but highly productive group of authors.

AB - Purpose: Publication analysis has value in evaluating the mechanics of academic efforts in specific scientific communities. The specific aim of this study was to evaluate whether established bibliometric patterns seen in other academic fields were likewise observed in radiation oncology publication parameters. Methods and Materials: We used a commercial bibliographic database to analyze all publications in Red Journal, or International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (IJROBP), the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO), and Radiology (Rad) between January 1, 1975 and May 18, 2011. Power-law (Lotka's law or 1/n2) conformance was assessed. Curve fit analysis was then performed. Results: In all 4 journals, a total of 219,476 authors were responsible for 62,232 articles. Of those, 79,810 authors published 13,772 articles in IJROBP, with 79,446/16,707 authors/articles in NEJM, 106,984/11,920 authors/articles in JCO and 90,325/19,745 authors/articles in Rad. The mean ± standard deviation of authors per publication was 5.74 ± 4.61 overall. There were 5.8 ± 3.53, 4.8 ± 5.7, 8.9 ± 3.53, and 4.6 ± 2.8 authors per article in IJROBP, NEJM, JCO, and Rad, respectively (P2.02 of those publishing 1 article in IJROBP, 1/n2.52 in NEJM, 1/n1.97 in JCO, and 1/n2.16 in Rad. Conclusions: Bibliometric analysis shows that authorship distributions in IJROBP approximate those of the scientific literature in comparable scientific journals. Our results suggest that the majority of publications in the field of radiation oncology are produced by a small but highly productive group of authors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871386864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871386864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22560553

AN - SCOPUS:84871386864

VL - 85

SP - 23

EP - 28

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 1

ER -