“Sometimes you wonder, is this really true?”: Clinician assessment of patients' subjective experience of pain

Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, Karleen F. Giannitrapani, Steven K. Dobscha, Risa Cromer, Karl A. Lorenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Pain is a subjective experience that must be translated by clinicians into an objective assessment to guide intervention. Objective: To understand how patients' subjective experience of pain is translated by primary care clinicians into an objective clinical assessment of pain to effectively guide intervention. Methods: We conducted nine multidisciplinary focus groups with a combined total of 60 Veteran affair (VA) primary care providers and staff from two large VA medical centers in California and Oregon. We used content analysis methods to identify key themes pertaining to clinical assessment of a subjective experience. Results: We present four emergent themes. Theme 1: Pain is a highly individualized and subjective experience not adequately captured by a simple numeric scale; Theme 2: Conflict commonly exists between the patient's reported experience of pain and the clinician's observations and expectations of pain; Theme 3: Providers attempt to recalibrate the patient's reported experience to reflect their own understanding of pain; and Theme 4: Providers perceive that some patients may overreport their pain because they do not know how to standardize their subjective experience. Conclusions: A persistent challenge to pain assessment and management is how clinicians reconcile a patient's subjective self-reported experience with their own clinical assessment and personal biases. Future work should explore these themes from the patient perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pain
Veterans
Pain Measurement
Primary Health Care
Pain Management
Focus Groups

Keywords

  • experience
  • health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

“Sometimes you wonder, is this really true?” : Clinician assessment of patients' subjective experience of pain. / Ahluwalia, Sangeeta C.; Giannitrapani, Karleen F.; Dobscha, Steven K.; Cromer, Risa; Lorenz, Karl A.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d7b62bf4eec249a8b25ac3b17d4e7baa,
title = "“Sometimes you wonder, is this really true?”: Clinician assessment of patients' subjective experience of pain",
abstract = "Background: Pain is a subjective experience that must be translated by clinicians into an objective assessment to guide intervention. Objective: To understand how patients' subjective experience of pain is translated by primary care clinicians into an objective clinical assessment of pain to effectively guide intervention. Methods: We conducted nine multidisciplinary focus groups with a combined total of 60 Veteran affair (VA) primary care providers and staff from two large VA medical centers in California and Oregon. We used content analysis methods to identify key themes pertaining to clinical assessment of a subjective experience. Results: We present four emergent themes. Theme 1: Pain is a highly individualized and subjective experience not adequately captured by a simple numeric scale; Theme 2: Conflict commonly exists between the patient's reported experience of pain and the clinician's observations and expectations of pain; Theme 3: Providers attempt to recalibrate the patient's reported experience to reflect their own understanding of pain; and Theme 4: Providers perceive that some patients may overreport their pain because they do not know how to standardize their subjective experience. Conclusions: A persistent challenge to pain assessment and management is how clinicians reconcile a patient's subjective self-reported experience with their own clinical assessment and personal biases. Future work should explore these themes from the patient perspective.",
keywords = "experience, health care",
author = "Ahluwalia, {Sangeeta C.} and Giannitrapani, {Karleen F.} and Dobscha, {Steven K.} and Risa Cromer and Lorenz, {Karl A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jep.13298",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Sometimes you wonder, is this really true?”

T2 - Clinician assessment of patients' subjective experience of pain

AU - Ahluwalia, Sangeeta C.

AU - Giannitrapani, Karleen F.

AU - Dobscha, Steven K.

AU - Cromer, Risa

AU - Lorenz, Karl A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Pain is a subjective experience that must be translated by clinicians into an objective assessment to guide intervention. Objective: To understand how patients' subjective experience of pain is translated by primary care clinicians into an objective clinical assessment of pain to effectively guide intervention. Methods: We conducted nine multidisciplinary focus groups with a combined total of 60 Veteran affair (VA) primary care providers and staff from two large VA medical centers in California and Oregon. We used content analysis methods to identify key themes pertaining to clinical assessment of a subjective experience. Results: We present four emergent themes. Theme 1: Pain is a highly individualized and subjective experience not adequately captured by a simple numeric scale; Theme 2: Conflict commonly exists between the patient's reported experience of pain and the clinician's observations and expectations of pain; Theme 3: Providers attempt to recalibrate the patient's reported experience to reflect their own understanding of pain; and Theme 4: Providers perceive that some patients may overreport their pain because they do not know how to standardize their subjective experience. Conclusions: A persistent challenge to pain assessment and management is how clinicians reconcile a patient's subjective self-reported experience with their own clinical assessment and personal biases. Future work should explore these themes from the patient perspective.

AB - Background: Pain is a subjective experience that must be translated by clinicians into an objective assessment to guide intervention. Objective: To understand how patients' subjective experience of pain is translated by primary care clinicians into an objective clinical assessment of pain to effectively guide intervention. Methods: We conducted nine multidisciplinary focus groups with a combined total of 60 Veteran affair (VA) primary care providers and staff from two large VA medical centers in California and Oregon. We used content analysis methods to identify key themes pertaining to clinical assessment of a subjective experience. Results: We present four emergent themes. Theme 1: Pain is a highly individualized and subjective experience not adequately captured by a simple numeric scale; Theme 2: Conflict commonly exists between the patient's reported experience of pain and the clinician's observations and expectations of pain; Theme 3: Providers attempt to recalibrate the patient's reported experience to reflect their own understanding of pain; and Theme 4: Providers perceive that some patients may overreport their pain because they do not know how to standardize their subjective experience. Conclusions: A persistent challenge to pain assessment and management is how clinicians reconcile a patient's subjective self-reported experience with their own clinical assessment and personal biases. Future work should explore these themes from the patient perspective.

KW - experience

KW - health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074780430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074780430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jep.13298

DO - 10.1111/jep.13298

M3 - Article

C2 - 31680385

AN - SCOPUS:85074780430

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

ER -