Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation

Kara M. Coassolo, David M. Stamilio, Emmanuelle Pare, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Erika Stevens, Deborah B. Nelson, George A. Macones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) failure and major complications in women attempting VBAC before and after the estimated date of delivery (EDD) METHODS: This was a 5-year retrospective cohort study in 17 university and community hospitals of women with at least 1 prior cesarean delivery. Women who attempted VBAC before the EDD were compared with those at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between delivery beyond the EDD and VBAC failure or complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 11,587 women in the cohort attempted VBAC. Women past 40 weeks of gestation were more likely to have a failed VBAC. After controlling for confounders, the increased risk of a failed VBAC beyond 40 weeks remained significant (31.3% compared with 22.2%, odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.50). The risk of uterine rupture (1.1% compared with 1.0%) or overall morbidity (2.7% compared with 2.1%) was not significantly increased in the women attempting VBAC beyond the EDD. When the cohort was defined as 41 weeks or more of gestation, the risk of a failed VBAC was again significantly increased (35.4% compared with 24.3%, odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.53), but the risk of uterine rupture or overall morbidity was not increased. CONCLUSION: Women beyond 40 weeks of gestation can safely attempt VBAC, although the risk of VBAC failure is increased.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)700-706
Number of pages7
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume106
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Safety
Pregnancy
Uterine Rupture
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Morbidity
Community Hospital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Coassolo, K. M., Stamilio, D. M., Pare, E., Peipert, J. F., Stevens, E., Nelson, D. B., & Macones, G. A. (2005). Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 106(4), 700-706.

Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. / Coassolo, Kara M.; Stamilio, David M.; Pare, Emmanuelle; Peipert, Jeffrey F.; Stevens, Erika; Nelson, Deborah B.; Macones, George A.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 106, No. 4, 10.2005, p. 700-706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coassolo, KM, Stamilio, DM, Pare, E, Peipert, JF, Stevens, E, Nelson, DB & Macones, GA 2005, 'Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation', Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 700-706.
Coassolo KM, Stamilio DM, Pare E, Peipert JF, Stevens E, Nelson DB et al. Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 Oct;106(4):700-706.
Coassolo, Kara M. ; Stamilio, David M. ; Pare, Emmanuelle ; Peipert, Jeffrey F. ; Stevens, Erika ; Nelson, Deborah B. ; Macones, George A. / Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 ; Vol. 106, No. 4. pp. 700-706.
@article{ac7051a9dd774547ba5a03af21f08951,
title = "Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) failure and major complications in women attempting VBAC before and after the estimated date of delivery (EDD) METHODS: This was a 5-year retrospective cohort study in 17 university and community hospitals of women with at least 1 prior cesarean delivery. Women who attempted VBAC before the EDD were compared with those at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between delivery beyond the EDD and VBAC failure or complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 11,587 women in the cohort attempted VBAC. Women past 40 weeks of gestation were more likely to have a failed VBAC. After controlling for confounders, the increased risk of a failed VBAC beyond 40 weeks remained significant (31.3{\%} compared with 22.2{\%}, odds ratio 1.36, 95{\%} confidence interval 1.24-1.50). The risk of uterine rupture (1.1{\%} compared with 1.0{\%}) or overall morbidity (2.7{\%} compared with 2.1{\%}) was not significantly increased in the women attempting VBAC beyond the EDD. When the cohort was defined as 41 weeks or more of gestation, the risk of a failed VBAC was again significantly increased (35.4{\%} compared with 24.3{\%}, odds ratio 1.35, 95{\%} confidence interval 1.20-1.53), but the risk of uterine rupture or overall morbidity was not increased. CONCLUSION: Women beyond 40 weeks of gestation can safely attempt VBAC, although the risk of VBAC failure is increased.",
author = "Coassolo, {Kara M.} and Stamilio, {David M.} and Emmanuelle Pare and Peipert, {Jeffrey F.} and Erika Stevens and Nelson, {Deborah B.} and Macones, {George A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "700--706",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and efficacy of vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation

AU - Coassolo, Kara M.

AU - Stamilio, David M.

AU - Pare, Emmanuelle

AU - Peipert, Jeffrey F.

AU - Stevens, Erika

AU - Nelson, Deborah B.

AU - Macones, George A.

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) failure and major complications in women attempting VBAC before and after the estimated date of delivery (EDD) METHODS: This was a 5-year retrospective cohort study in 17 university and community hospitals of women with at least 1 prior cesarean delivery. Women who attempted VBAC before the EDD were compared with those at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between delivery beyond the EDD and VBAC failure or complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 11,587 women in the cohort attempted VBAC. Women past 40 weeks of gestation were more likely to have a failed VBAC. After controlling for confounders, the increased risk of a failed VBAC beyond 40 weeks remained significant (31.3% compared with 22.2%, odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.50). The risk of uterine rupture (1.1% compared with 1.0%) or overall morbidity (2.7% compared with 2.1%) was not significantly increased in the women attempting VBAC beyond the EDD. When the cohort was defined as 41 weeks or more of gestation, the risk of a failed VBAC was again significantly increased (35.4% compared with 24.3%, odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.53), but the risk of uterine rupture or overall morbidity was not increased. CONCLUSION: Women beyond 40 weeks of gestation can safely attempt VBAC, although the risk of VBAC failure is increased.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) failure and major complications in women attempting VBAC before and after the estimated date of delivery (EDD) METHODS: This was a 5-year retrospective cohort study in 17 university and community hospitals of women with at least 1 prior cesarean delivery. Women who attempted VBAC before the EDD were compared with those at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between delivery beyond the EDD and VBAC failure or complication rate. RESULTS: A total of 11,587 women in the cohort attempted VBAC. Women past 40 weeks of gestation were more likely to have a failed VBAC. After controlling for confounders, the increased risk of a failed VBAC beyond 40 weeks remained significant (31.3% compared with 22.2%, odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.50). The risk of uterine rupture (1.1% compared with 1.0%) or overall morbidity (2.7% compared with 2.1%) was not significantly increased in the women attempting VBAC beyond the EDD. When the cohort was defined as 41 weeks or more of gestation, the risk of a failed VBAC was again significantly increased (35.4% compared with 24.3%, odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.53), but the risk of uterine rupture or overall morbidity was not increased. CONCLUSION: Women beyond 40 weeks of gestation can safely attempt VBAC, although the risk of VBAC failure is increased.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25444468652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25444468652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 700

EP - 706

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 4

ER -