Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: Findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Mona F. Anabtawi, Gregg H. Gilbert, Michael R. Bauer, Gregory (Gregg) Reams, Sonia K. Makhija, Paul L. Benjamin, O. Dale Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) provided a means to investigate whether certain procedures were performed routinely. The authors conducted a study to quantify rubber dam use during root canal treatment (RCT) among general dentists and to test the hypothesis that certain dentist or practice characteristics were associated with rubber dam use. Methods: DPBRN practitioner-investigators (P-Is) answered a questionnaire that included items about rubber dam use and other forms of isolation during RCT. DPBRN enrollment questionnaire data provided information regarding practitioner and practice characteristics. Results: Atotal of 729 (74 percent) of 991 P-Is responded;524 were general dentists who reported providing at least some RCTs and reported the percentage of RCTs for which they used a rubber dam. Of these 524 P-Is, 44 percent used a rubber dam for all RCTs, 24 percent used it for 51 to 99 percent of RCTs, 17 percent used it for 1 to 50 percent of RCTs, and 15 percent never used it during RCT. Usage varied significantly by geographic region and practice type. The use of cotton rolls and other forms of isolation also was reported. Conclusions: Similar to other reports in the literature, not all DPBRN general dentists used a rubber dam during RCT. Clinical Implications: Because the clinical reference standard is to use a rubber dam during RCT, increasing its use may be important.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-186
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume144
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rubber Dams
Dental Pulp Cavity
Tooth
Dentists
Research
Research Personnel
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Dentistry
  • Practice-Based Research
  • Root canal treatment
  • Rubber dam

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Anabtawi, M. F., Gilbert, G. H., Bauer, M. R., Reams, G. G., Makhija, S. K., Benjamin, P. L., & Dale Williams, O. (2013). Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: Findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Journal of the American Dental Association, 144(2), 179-186.

Rubber dam use during root canal treatment : Findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. / Anabtawi, Mona F.; Gilbert, Gregg H.; Bauer, Michael R.; Reams, Gregory (Gregg); Makhija, Sonia K.; Benjamin, Paul L.; Dale Williams, O.

In: Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 144, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 179-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anabtawi, MF, Gilbert, GH, Bauer, MR, Reams, GG, Makhija, SK, Benjamin, PL & Dale Williams, O 2013, 'Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: Findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network', Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 179-186.
Anabtawi, Mona F. ; Gilbert, Gregg H. ; Bauer, Michael R. ; Reams, Gregory (Gregg) ; Makhija, Sonia K. ; Benjamin, Paul L. ; Dale Williams, O. / Rubber dam use during root canal treatment : Findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. In: Journal of the American Dental Association. 2013 ; Vol. 144, No. 2. pp. 179-186.
@article{43985d6e4b8d424096bea93a91c3b99e,
title = "Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: Findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network",
abstract = "Background: The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) provided a means to investigate whether certain procedures were performed routinely. The authors conducted a study to quantify rubber dam use during root canal treatment (RCT) among general dentists and to test the hypothesis that certain dentist or practice characteristics were associated with rubber dam use. Methods: DPBRN practitioner-investigators (P-Is) answered a questionnaire that included items about rubber dam use and other forms of isolation during RCT. DPBRN enrollment questionnaire data provided information regarding practitioner and practice characteristics. Results: Atotal of 729 (74 percent) of 991 P-Is responded;524 were general dentists who reported providing at least some RCTs and reported the percentage of RCTs for which they used a rubber dam. Of these 524 P-Is, 44 percent used a rubber dam for all RCTs, 24 percent used it for 51 to 99 percent of RCTs, 17 percent used it for 1 to 50 percent of RCTs, and 15 percent never used it during RCT. Usage varied significantly by geographic region and practice type. The use of cotton rolls and other forms of isolation also was reported. Conclusions: Similar to other reports in the literature, not all DPBRN general dentists used a rubber dam during RCT. Clinical Implications: Because the clinical reference standard is to use a rubber dam during RCT, increasing its use may be important.",
keywords = "Dentistry, Practice-Based Research, Root canal treatment, Rubber dam",
author = "Anabtawi, {Mona F.} and Gilbert, {Gregg H.} and Bauer, {Michael R.} and Reams, {Gregory (Gregg)} and Makhija, {Sonia K.} and Benjamin, {Paul L.} and {Dale Williams}, O.",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "179--186",
journal = "Journal of the American Dental Association",
issn = "0002-8177",
publisher = "American Dental Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rubber dam use during root canal treatment

T2 - Findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network

AU - Anabtawi, Mona F.

AU - Gilbert, Gregg H.

AU - Bauer, Michael R.

AU - Reams, Gregory (Gregg)

AU - Makhija, Sonia K.

AU - Benjamin, Paul L.

AU - Dale Williams, O.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background: The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) provided a means to investigate whether certain procedures were performed routinely. The authors conducted a study to quantify rubber dam use during root canal treatment (RCT) among general dentists and to test the hypothesis that certain dentist or practice characteristics were associated with rubber dam use. Methods: DPBRN practitioner-investigators (P-Is) answered a questionnaire that included items about rubber dam use and other forms of isolation during RCT. DPBRN enrollment questionnaire data provided information regarding practitioner and practice characteristics. Results: Atotal of 729 (74 percent) of 991 P-Is responded;524 were general dentists who reported providing at least some RCTs and reported the percentage of RCTs for which they used a rubber dam. Of these 524 P-Is, 44 percent used a rubber dam for all RCTs, 24 percent used it for 51 to 99 percent of RCTs, 17 percent used it for 1 to 50 percent of RCTs, and 15 percent never used it during RCT. Usage varied significantly by geographic region and practice type. The use of cotton rolls and other forms of isolation also was reported. Conclusions: Similar to other reports in the literature, not all DPBRN general dentists used a rubber dam during RCT. Clinical Implications: Because the clinical reference standard is to use a rubber dam during RCT, increasing its use may be important.

AB - Background: The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) provided a means to investigate whether certain procedures were performed routinely. The authors conducted a study to quantify rubber dam use during root canal treatment (RCT) among general dentists and to test the hypothesis that certain dentist or practice characteristics were associated with rubber dam use. Methods: DPBRN practitioner-investigators (P-Is) answered a questionnaire that included items about rubber dam use and other forms of isolation during RCT. DPBRN enrollment questionnaire data provided information regarding practitioner and practice characteristics. Results: Atotal of 729 (74 percent) of 991 P-Is responded;524 were general dentists who reported providing at least some RCTs and reported the percentage of RCTs for which they used a rubber dam. Of these 524 P-Is, 44 percent used a rubber dam for all RCTs, 24 percent used it for 51 to 99 percent of RCTs, 17 percent used it for 1 to 50 percent of RCTs, and 15 percent never used it during RCT. Usage varied significantly by geographic region and practice type. The use of cotton rolls and other forms of isolation also was reported. Conclusions: Similar to other reports in the literature, not all DPBRN general dentists used a rubber dam during RCT. Clinical Implications: Because the clinical reference standard is to use a rubber dam during RCT, increasing its use may be important.

KW - Dentistry

KW - Practice-Based Research

KW - Root canal treatment

KW - Rubber dam

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874723988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874723988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23372134

AN - SCOPUS:84874723988

VL - 144

SP - 179

EP - 186

JO - Journal of the American Dental Association

JF - Journal of the American Dental Association

SN - 0002-8177

IS - 2

ER -