Routine Inclusion of Long-term Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) into Trauma Registries: The FORTE project

Arturo J. Rios-Diaz, Juan P. Herrera-Escobar, Elizabeth J. Lilley, Jessica R. Appelson, Belinda Gabbe, Karen Brasel, Terri deRoon-Cassini, Eric B. Schneider, George Kasotakis, Haytham Kaafarani, George Velmahos, Ali Salim, Adil H. Haider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) recently recommended inclusion of post-discharge health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) metrics to benchmark the quality of trauma care. Currently, these measures are not routinely collected at most trauma centers. We sought to determine the feasibility and value of adding such long-term outcome measures to trauma registries. METHODS: As part of the Functional Outcomes and Recovery after Trauma Emergencies (FORTE) project we included patients with an ISS ≥9, admitted to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA who were identified retrospectively using the institutional trauma registry and contacted 6 or 12-months post-injury to participate in a telephone survey evaluating: HRQoL (Short Form-12 [SF-12]), PROs (Trauma Quality of Life [T-QoL]), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), return to work, residential status, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Data were collected for 171 of 394 eligible patients: 85/189 (45%) at 6mo and 86/205 (42%) at 12mo. 25%/29% (6/12mo) patients could not be contacted, 15%/16% (6/12mo) declined to participate, and 15%/13% (6/12mo) were interested in participating at another time but were not reached again. Approximately 20% patients screened positive for PTSD and half had not yet returned to work. There were significant reductions in SF-12 physical composite scores relative to population norms (mean [SD]= 50[10]) at 6mo (mean [95%CI]= 44[41-47]) and 12mo (45[42-47]); no difference was noted in the SF-12 mental composite scores (51[48-54]/50[46-53]). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients reported considerable impairment 6 and 12 months after injury. Routine collection of PROs and HRQoL provides important data regarding trauma outcomes beyond mortality and will enable the development of quality improvement metrics that better reflect patients’ post-injury experiences. Improved and alternate methods for collection of these data need to be developed to enhance response rates before widespread adoption across trauma centers in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Therapeutic/Care Management

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 20 2017

Fingerprint

Registries
Emergencies
Wounds and Injuries
Quality of Life
Trauma Centers
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Benchmarking
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Return to Work
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Telephone
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care
Mortality
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Routine Inclusion of Long-term Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) into Trauma Registries : The FORTE project. / Rios-Diaz, Arturo J.; Herrera-Escobar, Juan P.; Lilley, Elizabeth J.; Appelson, Jessica R.; Gabbe, Belinda; Brasel, Karen; deRoon-Cassini, Terri; Schneider, Eric B.; Kasotakis, George; Kaafarani, Haytham; Velmahos, George; Salim, Ali; Haider, Adil H.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 20.04.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rios-Diaz, AJ, Herrera-Escobar, JP, Lilley, EJ, Appelson, JR, Gabbe, B, Brasel, K, deRoon-Cassini, T, Schneider, EB, Kasotakis, G, Kaafarani, H, Velmahos, G, Salim, A & Haider, AH 2017, 'Routine Inclusion of Long-term Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) into Trauma Registries: The FORTE project', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001490
Rios-Diaz, Arturo J. ; Herrera-Escobar, Juan P. ; Lilley, Elizabeth J. ; Appelson, Jessica R. ; Gabbe, Belinda ; Brasel, Karen ; deRoon-Cassini, Terri ; Schneider, Eric B. ; Kasotakis, George ; Kaafarani, Haytham ; Velmahos, George ; Salim, Ali ; Haider, Adil H. / Routine Inclusion of Long-term Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) into Trauma Registries : The FORTE project. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017.
@article{4dba8ba4f9fb41c387751ed6e9312232,
title = "Routine Inclusion of Long-term Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) into Trauma Registries: The FORTE project",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) recently recommended inclusion of post-discharge health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) metrics to benchmark the quality of trauma care. Currently, these measures are not routinely collected at most trauma centers. We sought to determine the feasibility and value of adding such long-term outcome measures to trauma registries. METHODS: As part of the Functional Outcomes and Recovery after Trauma Emergencies (FORTE) project we included patients with an ISS ≥9, admitted to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA who were identified retrospectively using the institutional trauma registry and contacted 6 or 12-months post-injury to participate in a telephone survey evaluating: HRQoL (Short Form-12 [SF-12]), PROs (Trauma Quality of Life [T-QoL]), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), return to work, residential status, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Data were collected for 171 of 394 eligible patients: 85/189 (45{\%}) at 6mo and 86/205 (42{\%}) at 12mo. 25{\%}/29{\%} (6/12mo) patients could not be contacted, 15{\%}/16{\%} (6/12mo) declined to participate, and 15{\%}/13{\%} (6/12mo) were interested in participating at another time but were not reached again. Approximately 20{\%} patients screened positive for PTSD and half had not yet returned to work. There were significant reductions in SF-12 physical composite scores relative to population norms (mean [SD]= 50[10]) at 6mo (mean [95{\%}CI]= 44[41-47]) and 12mo (45[42-47]); no difference was noted in the SF-12 mental composite scores (51[48-54]/50[46-53]). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients reported considerable impairment 6 and 12 months after injury. Routine collection of PROs and HRQoL provides important data regarding trauma outcomes beyond mortality and will enable the development of quality improvement metrics that better reflect patients’ post-injury experiences. Improved and alternate methods for collection of these data need to be developed to enhance response rates before widespread adoption across trauma centers in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Therapeutic/Care Management",
author = "Rios-Diaz, {Arturo J.} and Herrera-Escobar, {Juan P.} and Lilley, {Elizabeth J.} and Appelson, {Jessica R.} and Belinda Gabbe and Karen Brasel and Terri deRoon-Cassini and Schneider, {Eric B.} and George Kasotakis and Haytham Kaafarani and George Velmahos and Ali Salim and Haider, {Adil H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000001490",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine Inclusion of Long-term Functional and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) into Trauma Registries

T2 - The FORTE project

AU - Rios-Diaz, Arturo J.

AU - Herrera-Escobar, Juan P.

AU - Lilley, Elizabeth J.

AU - Appelson, Jessica R.

AU - Gabbe, Belinda

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - deRoon-Cassini, Terri

AU - Schneider, Eric B.

AU - Kasotakis, George

AU - Kaafarani, Haytham

AU - Velmahos, George

AU - Salim, Ali

AU - Haider, Adil H.

PY - 2017/4/20

Y1 - 2017/4/20

N2 - BACKGROUND: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) recently recommended inclusion of post-discharge health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) metrics to benchmark the quality of trauma care. Currently, these measures are not routinely collected at most trauma centers. We sought to determine the feasibility and value of adding such long-term outcome measures to trauma registries. METHODS: As part of the Functional Outcomes and Recovery after Trauma Emergencies (FORTE) project we included patients with an ISS ≥9, admitted to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA who were identified retrospectively using the institutional trauma registry and contacted 6 or 12-months post-injury to participate in a telephone survey evaluating: HRQoL (Short Form-12 [SF-12]), PROs (Trauma Quality of Life [T-QoL]), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), return to work, residential status, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Data were collected for 171 of 394 eligible patients: 85/189 (45%) at 6mo and 86/205 (42%) at 12mo. 25%/29% (6/12mo) patients could not be contacted, 15%/16% (6/12mo) declined to participate, and 15%/13% (6/12mo) were interested in participating at another time but were not reached again. Approximately 20% patients screened positive for PTSD and half had not yet returned to work. There were significant reductions in SF-12 physical composite scores relative to population norms (mean [SD]= 50[10]) at 6mo (mean [95%CI]= 44[41-47]) and 12mo (45[42-47]); no difference was noted in the SF-12 mental composite scores (51[48-54]/50[46-53]). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients reported considerable impairment 6 and 12 months after injury. Routine collection of PROs and HRQoL provides important data regarding trauma outcomes beyond mortality and will enable the development of quality improvement metrics that better reflect patients’ post-injury experiences. Improved and alternate methods for collection of these data need to be developed to enhance response rates before widespread adoption across trauma centers in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Therapeutic/Care Management

AB - BACKGROUND: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) recently recommended inclusion of post-discharge health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) metrics to benchmark the quality of trauma care. Currently, these measures are not routinely collected at most trauma centers. We sought to determine the feasibility and value of adding such long-term outcome measures to trauma registries. METHODS: As part of the Functional Outcomes and Recovery after Trauma Emergencies (FORTE) project we included patients with an ISS ≥9, admitted to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA who were identified retrospectively using the institutional trauma registry and contacted 6 or 12-months post-injury to participate in a telephone survey evaluating: HRQoL (Short Form-12 [SF-12]), PROs (Trauma Quality of Life [T-QoL]), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), return to work, residential status, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Data were collected for 171 of 394 eligible patients: 85/189 (45%) at 6mo and 86/205 (42%) at 12mo. 25%/29% (6/12mo) patients could not be contacted, 15%/16% (6/12mo) declined to participate, and 15%/13% (6/12mo) were interested in participating at another time but were not reached again. Approximately 20% patients screened positive for PTSD and half had not yet returned to work. There were significant reductions in SF-12 physical composite scores relative to population norms (mean [SD]= 50[10]) at 6mo (mean [95%CI]= 44[41-47]) and 12mo (45[42-47]); no difference was noted in the SF-12 mental composite scores (51[48-54]/50[46-53]). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients reported considerable impairment 6 and 12 months after injury. Routine collection of PROs and HRQoL provides important data regarding trauma outcomes beyond mortality and will enable the development of quality improvement metrics that better reflect patients’ post-injury experiences. Improved and alternate methods for collection of these data need to be developed to enhance response rates before widespread adoption across trauma centers in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Therapeutic/Care Management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018502091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018502091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001490

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001490

M3 - Article

C2 - 28426563

AN - SCOPUS:85018502091

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

ER -