Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers

Travis I. Lovejoy, Tracey A. Revenson, Christopher R. France

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The importance of peer review in the furthering of science cannot be overstated. However, most doctoral students and early career professionals receive little formal or informal training in conducting peer reviews. Purpose: In recognition of this deficit in peer reviewer training, the present article was developed to provide an overview of the peer-review process at Annals of Behavioral Medicine and describe the general and specific elements that should be included in a high-quality review for the journal. Conclusion: We conclude by offering exemplar reviews of a manuscript that was ultimately accepted for publication in the journal and provide commentary on specific aspects of these reviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Keywords

  • Peer review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this