Response bias is unaffected by delay length in a delay discounting paradigm

Clare Wilhelm, Suzanne Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of response bias to measures of delay discounting in Long-Evans rats (n=8) using the adjusting amount procedure. Under this procedure, we assessed preference for 150 μl of 10% sucrose solution delivered following a delay over a variable-amount alternative delivered immediately. Bias was calculated based on relative preference when reinforcers were delivered immediately from both alternatives. We extended this assessment procedure to examine preference when rewards from both alternatives were equally delayed (2, 4, 8, or 16. s) in addition to assessing a traditional delay discounting function. Relative preference was similar across delays and slightly larger than 150μl. These results indicate that response bias was stable and suggests a relative aversion for the adjusting alternative, which may be due to the variability in reward size associated with that alternative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-449
Number of pages5
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Reward
Long Evans Rats
Sucrose
sucrose
rats
Delay Discounting

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Delay discounting
  • Rats
  • Reinforcer size
  • Variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Response bias is unaffected by delay length in a delay discounting paradigm. / Wilhelm, Clare; Mitchell, Suzanne.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 84, No. 1, 05.2010, p. 445-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a24e9d05344a4bb9b07a0d3fc1f191cd,
title = "Response bias is unaffected by delay length in a delay discounting paradigm",
abstract = "This study examined the contribution of response bias to measures of delay discounting in Long-Evans rats (n=8) using the adjusting amount procedure. Under this procedure, we assessed preference for 150 μl of 10{\%} sucrose solution delivered following a delay over a variable-amount alternative delivered immediately. Bias was calculated based on relative preference when reinforcers were delivered immediately from both alternatives. We extended this assessment procedure to examine preference when rewards from both alternatives were equally delayed (2, 4, 8, or 16. s) in addition to assessing a traditional delay discounting function. Relative preference was similar across delays and slightly larger than 150μl. These results indicate that response bias was stable and suggests a relative aversion for the adjusting alternative, which may be due to the variability in reward size associated with that alternative.",
keywords = "Bias, Delay discounting, Rats, Reinforcer size, Variability",
author = "Clare Wilhelm and Suzanne Mitchell",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "445--449",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response bias is unaffected by delay length in a delay discounting paradigm

AU - Wilhelm, Clare

AU - Mitchell, Suzanne

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - This study examined the contribution of response bias to measures of delay discounting in Long-Evans rats (n=8) using the adjusting amount procedure. Under this procedure, we assessed preference for 150 μl of 10% sucrose solution delivered following a delay over a variable-amount alternative delivered immediately. Bias was calculated based on relative preference when reinforcers were delivered immediately from both alternatives. We extended this assessment procedure to examine preference when rewards from both alternatives were equally delayed (2, 4, 8, or 16. s) in addition to assessing a traditional delay discounting function. Relative preference was similar across delays and slightly larger than 150μl. These results indicate that response bias was stable and suggests a relative aversion for the adjusting alternative, which may be due to the variability in reward size associated with that alternative.

AB - This study examined the contribution of response bias to measures of delay discounting in Long-Evans rats (n=8) using the adjusting amount procedure. Under this procedure, we assessed preference for 150 μl of 10% sucrose solution delivered following a delay over a variable-amount alternative delivered immediately. Bias was calculated based on relative preference when reinforcers were delivered immediately from both alternatives. We extended this assessment procedure to examine preference when rewards from both alternatives were equally delayed (2, 4, 8, or 16. s) in addition to assessing a traditional delay discounting function. Relative preference was similar across delays and slightly larger than 150μl. These results indicate that response bias was stable and suggests a relative aversion for the adjusting alternative, which may be due to the variability in reward size associated with that alternative.

KW - Bias

KW - Delay discounting

KW - Rats

KW - Reinforcer size

KW - Variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951974280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951974280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.017

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 20188800

AN - SCOPUS:77951974280

VL - 84

SP - 445

EP - 449

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 1

ER -