Reporting standard compliance in publications of vestibular schwannoma patients treated with microsurgery

Seunggu (Jude) Han, Michael C. Oh, Michael E. Sughrue, Derick Aranda, Martin J. Rutkowski, Andrew T. Parsa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2003, Kanzaki and colleagues published a set of reporting standards for vestibular schwannoma (VS) to serve as a guide for future publication, with the specific purpose of promoting standardization of reporting results in VS. OBJECTIVE: Here, the current published body of literature on VS cases treated with microsurgery was reviewed to determine its degree of adherence to consensus guidelines. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the English language literature was performed to identify studies reporting outcome data in patients treated with microsurgery for VSs. Each publication was reviewed to determine whether it had properly reported each of the 7 items relevant to surgical management described in the Consensus Meeting reporting guidelines. The number of studies that had included each of the key items before and after the publication of the reporting guidelines was compared. RESULTS: After the publication of the standards, there were a significantly greater proportion of studies that properly reported the nature of the tumor and facial nerve function. Since the publication of the Consensus Meeting Guidelines, there also were trends toward greater proportions of articles that properly reported the size, hearing function, preoperative symptoms, and postoperative complications of the patients treated. CONCLUSION: Since the release of the reporting system guidelines for VS, the focus of the publications seems to have shifted away from basic clinical characteristics and toward posttreatment neurologic function. Future studies reporting the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes for patients with VS cases should strive to include all the elements described in the Consensus Meeting guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)648-650
Number of pages3
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Acoustic Neuroma
Microsurgery
Compliance
Publications
Guidelines
Consensus
Facial Nerve
Nervous System
Hearing
Research Design
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Clinical outcomes
  • Microsurgery
  • Reporting standards
  • Vestibular schwannoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reporting standard compliance in publications of vestibular schwannoma patients treated with microsurgery. / Han, Seunggu (Jude); Oh, Michael C.; Sughrue, Michael E.; Aranda, Derick; Rutkowski, Martin J.; Parsa, Andrew T.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.06.2012, p. 648-650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Han, Seunggu (Jude) ; Oh, Michael C. ; Sughrue, Michael E. ; Aranda, Derick ; Rutkowski, Martin J. ; Parsa, Andrew T. / Reporting standard compliance in publications of vestibular schwannoma patients treated with microsurgery. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 648-650.
@article{4f02d1b2f1854aa3af917d65d422415f,
title = "Reporting standard compliance in publications of vestibular schwannoma patients treated with microsurgery",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In 2003, Kanzaki and colleagues published a set of reporting standards for vestibular schwannoma (VS) to serve as a guide for future publication, with the specific purpose of promoting standardization of reporting results in VS. OBJECTIVE: Here, the current published body of literature on VS cases treated with microsurgery was reviewed to determine its degree of adherence to consensus guidelines. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the English language literature was performed to identify studies reporting outcome data in patients treated with microsurgery for VSs. Each publication was reviewed to determine whether it had properly reported each of the 7 items relevant to surgical management described in the Consensus Meeting reporting guidelines. The number of studies that had included each of the key items before and after the publication of the reporting guidelines was compared. RESULTS: After the publication of the standards, there were a significantly greater proportion of studies that properly reported the nature of the tumor and facial nerve function. Since the publication of the Consensus Meeting Guidelines, there also were trends toward greater proportions of articles that properly reported the size, hearing function, preoperative symptoms, and postoperative complications of the patients treated. CONCLUSION: Since the release of the reporting system guidelines for VS, the focus of the publications seems to have shifted away from basic clinical characteristics and toward posttreatment neurologic function. Future studies reporting the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes for patients with VS cases should strive to include all the elements described in the Consensus Meeting guidelines.",
keywords = "Clinical outcomes, Microsurgery, Reporting standards, Vestibular schwannoma",
author = "Han, {Seunggu (Jude)} and Oh, {Michael C.} and Sughrue, {Michael E.} and Derick Aranda and Rutkowski, {Martin J.} and Parsa, {Andrew T.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824f998b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "648--650",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reporting standard compliance in publications of vestibular schwannoma patients treated with microsurgery

AU - Han, Seunggu (Jude)

AU - Oh, Michael C.

AU - Sughrue, Michael E.

AU - Aranda, Derick

AU - Rutkowski, Martin J.

AU - Parsa, Andrew T.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: In 2003, Kanzaki and colleagues published a set of reporting standards for vestibular schwannoma (VS) to serve as a guide for future publication, with the specific purpose of promoting standardization of reporting results in VS. OBJECTIVE: Here, the current published body of literature on VS cases treated with microsurgery was reviewed to determine its degree of adherence to consensus guidelines. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the English language literature was performed to identify studies reporting outcome data in patients treated with microsurgery for VSs. Each publication was reviewed to determine whether it had properly reported each of the 7 items relevant to surgical management described in the Consensus Meeting reporting guidelines. The number of studies that had included each of the key items before and after the publication of the reporting guidelines was compared. RESULTS: After the publication of the standards, there were a significantly greater proportion of studies that properly reported the nature of the tumor and facial nerve function. Since the publication of the Consensus Meeting Guidelines, there also were trends toward greater proportions of articles that properly reported the size, hearing function, preoperative symptoms, and postoperative complications of the patients treated. CONCLUSION: Since the release of the reporting system guidelines for VS, the focus of the publications seems to have shifted away from basic clinical characteristics and toward posttreatment neurologic function. Future studies reporting the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes for patients with VS cases should strive to include all the elements described in the Consensus Meeting guidelines.

AB - BACKGROUND: In 2003, Kanzaki and colleagues published a set of reporting standards for vestibular schwannoma (VS) to serve as a guide for future publication, with the specific purpose of promoting standardization of reporting results in VS. OBJECTIVE: Here, the current published body of literature on VS cases treated with microsurgery was reviewed to determine its degree of adherence to consensus guidelines. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the English language literature was performed to identify studies reporting outcome data in patients treated with microsurgery for VSs. Each publication was reviewed to determine whether it had properly reported each of the 7 items relevant to surgical management described in the Consensus Meeting reporting guidelines. The number of studies that had included each of the key items before and after the publication of the reporting guidelines was compared. RESULTS: After the publication of the standards, there were a significantly greater proportion of studies that properly reported the nature of the tumor and facial nerve function. Since the publication of the Consensus Meeting Guidelines, there also were trends toward greater proportions of articles that properly reported the size, hearing function, preoperative symptoms, and postoperative complications of the patients treated. CONCLUSION: Since the release of the reporting system guidelines for VS, the focus of the publications seems to have shifted away from basic clinical characteristics and toward posttreatment neurologic function. Future studies reporting the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes for patients with VS cases should strive to include all the elements described in the Consensus Meeting guidelines.

KW - Clinical outcomes

KW - Microsurgery

KW - Reporting standards

KW - Vestibular schwannoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861332840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861332840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824f998b

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824f998b

M3 - Article

C2 - 22525214

AN - SCOPUS:84861332840

VL - 33

SP - 648

EP - 650

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 4

ER -