Repeatability of adaptive optics automated cone measurements in subjects with retinitis pigmentosa and novel metrics for assessment of image quality

Michael J. Gale, Gareth A. Harman, Jimmy Chen, Mark Pennesi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We determine the intersession repeatability of cone measurements via flood-illuminated adaptive optics (AO) imaging in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), to better differentiate variation due to imaging inaccuracies versus pathology-driven change. Methods: A total of 25 4°X4° AO images were acquired three times on the same day in 10 subjects with RP, registered in i2K Retina, and cones were identified using a custom-built MATLAB algorithm. Nine equally spaced regions of interest were selected for each imaging set. A subset of subjectively ‘‘poor’’ and ‘‘good’’ quality images was selected by three independent graders, analyzed using cone density, cone location similarity (CLS) and cone spacing, and compared to age-matched normals. Results: The coefficient of variation (CoV), repeatability, and percent repeatability of automated cone density were slightly higher in patients with RP compared to age-matched normals, but showed no statistically significant difference. The standard deviation of CLS and cone spacing of nearest-neighbor distance demonstrated a statistically significant difference between good-and poor-quality images. Conclusions: Repeatability of automated cone density measurements in patients with RP is comparable to normals. Misidentification of cones due to image quality variability is a major limitation of automated cone counting algorithms in patients with RP. Our study suggests that CLS and cone spacing metrics could be used to help define image quality and, thus, increase confidence in automated cone counts in patients with RP. Translational Relevance: The novel AO image quality assessment metrics described in our study could help to improve patient image interpretation, prognosis, and longitudinal care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17
JournalTranslational Vision Science and Technology
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Retinitis Pigmentosa
Adaptive optics
Image quality
Cones
Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells
Imaging techniques
Pathology
MATLAB

Keywords

  • Adaptive optics
  • Cone photoreceptors
  • Retinitis pigmentosa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Repeatability of adaptive optics automated cone measurements in subjects with retinitis pigmentosa and novel metrics for assessment of image quality. / Gale, Michael J.; Harman, Gareth A.; Chen, Jimmy; Pennesi, Mark.

In: Translational Vision Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 17, 01.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{474c57d7b3bd43c29c591c896e08e939,
title = "Repeatability of adaptive optics automated cone measurements in subjects with retinitis pigmentosa and novel metrics for assessment of image quality",
abstract = "Purpose: We determine the intersession repeatability of cone measurements via flood-illuminated adaptive optics (AO) imaging in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), to better differentiate variation due to imaging inaccuracies versus pathology-driven change. Methods: A total of 25 4°X4° AO images were acquired three times on the same day in 10 subjects with RP, registered in i2K Retina, and cones were identified using a custom-built MATLAB algorithm. Nine equally spaced regions of interest were selected for each imaging set. A subset of subjectively ‘‘poor’’ and ‘‘good’’ quality images was selected by three independent graders, analyzed using cone density, cone location similarity (CLS) and cone spacing, and compared to age-matched normals. Results: The coefficient of variation (CoV), repeatability, and percent repeatability of automated cone density were slightly higher in patients with RP compared to age-matched normals, but showed no statistically significant difference. The standard deviation of CLS and cone spacing of nearest-neighbor distance demonstrated a statistically significant difference between good-and poor-quality images. Conclusions: Repeatability of automated cone density measurements in patients with RP is comparable to normals. Misidentification of cones due to image quality variability is a major limitation of automated cone counting algorithms in patients with RP. Our study suggests that CLS and cone spacing metrics could be used to help define image quality and, thus, increase confidence in automated cone counts in patients with RP. Translational Relevance: The novel AO image quality assessment metrics described in our study could help to improve patient image interpretation, prognosis, and longitudinal care.",
keywords = "Adaptive optics, Cone photoreceptors, Retinitis pigmentosa",
author = "Gale, {Michael J.} and Harman, {Gareth A.} and Jimmy Chen and Mark Pennesi",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/tvst.8.3.17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Translational Vision Science and Technology",
issn = "2164-2591",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeatability of adaptive optics automated cone measurements in subjects with retinitis pigmentosa and novel metrics for assessment of image quality

AU - Gale, Michael J.

AU - Harman, Gareth A.

AU - Chen, Jimmy

AU - Pennesi, Mark

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Purpose: We determine the intersession repeatability of cone measurements via flood-illuminated adaptive optics (AO) imaging in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), to better differentiate variation due to imaging inaccuracies versus pathology-driven change. Methods: A total of 25 4°X4° AO images were acquired three times on the same day in 10 subjects with RP, registered in i2K Retina, and cones were identified using a custom-built MATLAB algorithm. Nine equally spaced regions of interest were selected for each imaging set. A subset of subjectively ‘‘poor’’ and ‘‘good’’ quality images was selected by three independent graders, analyzed using cone density, cone location similarity (CLS) and cone spacing, and compared to age-matched normals. Results: The coefficient of variation (CoV), repeatability, and percent repeatability of automated cone density were slightly higher in patients with RP compared to age-matched normals, but showed no statistically significant difference. The standard deviation of CLS and cone spacing of nearest-neighbor distance demonstrated a statistically significant difference between good-and poor-quality images. Conclusions: Repeatability of automated cone density measurements in patients with RP is comparable to normals. Misidentification of cones due to image quality variability is a major limitation of automated cone counting algorithms in patients with RP. Our study suggests that CLS and cone spacing metrics could be used to help define image quality and, thus, increase confidence in automated cone counts in patients with RP. Translational Relevance: The novel AO image quality assessment metrics described in our study could help to improve patient image interpretation, prognosis, and longitudinal care.

AB - Purpose: We determine the intersession repeatability of cone measurements via flood-illuminated adaptive optics (AO) imaging in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), to better differentiate variation due to imaging inaccuracies versus pathology-driven change. Methods: A total of 25 4°X4° AO images were acquired three times on the same day in 10 subjects with RP, registered in i2K Retina, and cones were identified using a custom-built MATLAB algorithm. Nine equally spaced regions of interest were selected for each imaging set. A subset of subjectively ‘‘poor’’ and ‘‘good’’ quality images was selected by three independent graders, analyzed using cone density, cone location similarity (CLS) and cone spacing, and compared to age-matched normals. Results: The coefficient of variation (CoV), repeatability, and percent repeatability of automated cone density were slightly higher in patients with RP compared to age-matched normals, but showed no statistically significant difference. The standard deviation of CLS and cone spacing of nearest-neighbor distance demonstrated a statistically significant difference between good-and poor-quality images. Conclusions: Repeatability of automated cone density measurements in patients with RP is comparable to normals. Misidentification of cones due to image quality variability is a major limitation of automated cone counting algorithms in patients with RP. Our study suggests that CLS and cone spacing metrics could be used to help define image quality and, thus, increase confidence in automated cone counts in patients with RP. Translational Relevance: The novel AO image quality assessment metrics described in our study could help to improve patient image interpretation, prognosis, and longitudinal care.

KW - Adaptive optics

KW - Cone photoreceptors

KW - Retinitis pigmentosa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067449819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067449819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/tvst.8.3.17

DO - 10.1167/tvst.8.3.17

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067449819

VL - 8

JO - Translational Vision Science and Technology

JF - Translational Vision Science and Technology

SN - 2164-2591

IS - 3

M1 - 17

ER -