Reference-dose place conditioning with ethanol in mice: Empirical and theoretical analysis

Peter A. Groblewski, Laura S. Bax, Christopher Cunningham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: A frequently expressed criticism of the conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure is that it sometimes lacks a graded dose-response curve for many drugs. Objective: We used a combination of standard and reference-dose CPP procedures to examine the dose-response curve for ethanol-induced CPP in DBA/2J mice. Materials and methods: In the standard procedure, ethanol (0.5, 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg) was paired with a distinctive floor cue, whereas saline was paired with a different floor cue. In the reference-dose procedure, each cue was paired with a different dose of ethanol. All mice received four 5-min trials of each type in both procedures. Results: Standard procedures yielded similar levels of CPP at doses of 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg, whereas 0.5 g/kg did not produce significant CPP. However, in the reference-dose procedure, exposure to the 0.5-g/kg dose interfered with CPP normally produced by 1.5 or 2 g/kg. Moreover, mice showed significant preference for the 4-g/kg-paired cue over the 1.5-g/kg-paired cue. Conclusions: These studies show that a reference-dose procedure can reveal effects of low doses that are sometimes difficult to detect in a standard procedure. The reference-dose procedure may also uncover differences between higher doses that normally produce similar preference. Efficacy of the reference-dose procedure may be explained by a theoretical analysis that assumes the procedure places behavior between the extremes of the performance range, offering a more sensitive method for detecting effects of manipulations that produce small changes and/or differences in the rewarding effects of ethanol.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-106
Number of pages10
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume201
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Ethanol
Cues
Conditioning (Psychology)
Inbred DBA Mouse

Keywords

  • Conditioned place preference
  • Ethanol
  • Inbred mice (DBA/2J)
  • Locomotor activity
  • Reference-dose procedure
  • Reward

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Reference-dose place conditioning with ethanol in mice : Empirical and theoretical analysis. / Groblewski, Peter A.; Bax, Laura S.; Cunningham, Christopher.

In: Psychopharmacology, Vol. 201, No. 1, 11.2008, p. 97-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecb3de23ab2648718a21c1a04634a243,
title = "Reference-dose place conditioning with ethanol in mice: Empirical and theoretical analysis",
abstract = "Rationale: A frequently expressed criticism of the conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure is that it sometimes lacks a graded dose-response curve for many drugs. Objective: We used a combination of standard and reference-dose CPP procedures to examine the dose-response curve for ethanol-induced CPP in DBA/2J mice. Materials and methods: In the standard procedure, ethanol (0.5, 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg) was paired with a distinctive floor cue, whereas saline was paired with a different floor cue. In the reference-dose procedure, each cue was paired with a different dose of ethanol. All mice received four 5-min trials of each type in both procedures. Results: Standard procedures yielded similar levels of CPP at doses of 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg, whereas 0.5 g/kg did not produce significant CPP. However, in the reference-dose procedure, exposure to the 0.5-g/kg dose interfered with CPP normally produced by 1.5 or 2 g/kg. Moreover, mice showed significant preference for the 4-g/kg-paired cue over the 1.5-g/kg-paired cue. Conclusions: These studies show that a reference-dose procedure can reveal effects of low doses that are sometimes difficult to detect in a standard procedure. The reference-dose procedure may also uncover differences between higher doses that normally produce similar preference. Efficacy of the reference-dose procedure may be explained by a theoretical analysis that assumes the procedure places behavior between the extremes of the performance range, offering a more sensitive method for detecting effects of manipulations that produce small changes and/or differences in the rewarding effects of ethanol.",
keywords = "Conditioned place preference, Ethanol, Inbred mice (DBA/2J), Locomotor activity, Reference-dose procedure, Reward",
author = "Groblewski, {Peter A.} and Bax, {Laura S.} and Christopher Cunningham",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00213-008-1251-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "201",
pages = "97--106",
journal = "Psychopharmacology",
issn = "0033-3158",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reference-dose place conditioning with ethanol in mice

T2 - Empirical and theoretical analysis

AU - Groblewski, Peter A.

AU - Bax, Laura S.

AU - Cunningham, Christopher

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Rationale: A frequently expressed criticism of the conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure is that it sometimes lacks a graded dose-response curve for many drugs. Objective: We used a combination of standard and reference-dose CPP procedures to examine the dose-response curve for ethanol-induced CPP in DBA/2J mice. Materials and methods: In the standard procedure, ethanol (0.5, 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg) was paired with a distinctive floor cue, whereas saline was paired with a different floor cue. In the reference-dose procedure, each cue was paired with a different dose of ethanol. All mice received four 5-min trials of each type in both procedures. Results: Standard procedures yielded similar levels of CPP at doses of 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg, whereas 0.5 g/kg did not produce significant CPP. However, in the reference-dose procedure, exposure to the 0.5-g/kg dose interfered with CPP normally produced by 1.5 or 2 g/kg. Moreover, mice showed significant preference for the 4-g/kg-paired cue over the 1.5-g/kg-paired cue. Conclusions: These studies show that a reference-dose procedure can reveal effects of low doses that are sometimes difficult to detect in a standard procedure. The reference-dose procedure may also uncover differences between higher doses that normally produce similar preference. Efficacy of the reference-dose procedure may be explained by a theoretical analysis that assumes the procedure places behavior between the extremes of the performance range, offering a more sensitive method for detecting effects of manipulations that produce small changes and/or differences in the rewarding effects of ethanol.

AB - Rationale: A frequently expressed criticism of the conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure is that it sometimes lacks a graded dose-response curve for many drugs. Objective: We used a combination of standard and reference-dose CPP procedures to examine the dose-response curve for ethanol-induced CPP in DBA/2J mice. Materials and methods: In the standard procedure, ethanol (0.5, 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg) was paired with a distinctive floor cue, whereas saline was paired with a different floor cue. In the reference-dose procedure, each cue was paired with a different dose of ethanol. All mice received four 5-min trials of each type in both procedures. Results: Standard procedures yielded similar levels of CPP at doses of 1.5, 2, and 4 g/kg, whereas 0.5 g/kg did not produce significant CPP. However, in the reference-dose procedure, exposure to the 0.5-g/kg dose interfered with CPP normally produced by 1.5 or 2 g/kg. Moreover, mice showed significant preference for the 4-g/kg-paired cue over the 1.5-g/kg-paired cue. Conclusions: These studies show that a reference-dose procedure can reveal effects of low doses that are sometimes difficult to detect in a standard procedure. The reference-dose procedure may also uncover differences between higher doses that normally produce similar preference. Efficacy of the reference-dose procedure may be explained by a theoretical analysis that assumes the procedure places behavior between the extremes of the performance range, offering a more sensitive method for detecting effects of manipulations that produce small changes and/or differences in the rewarding effects of ethanol.

KW - Conditioned place preference

KW - Ethanol

KW - Inbred mice (DBA/2J)

KW - Locomotor activity

KW - Reference-dose procedure

KW - Reward

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54049132445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54049132445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00213-008-1251-3

DO - 10.1007/s00213-008-1251-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 18633601

AN - SCOPUS:54049132445

VL - 201

SP - 97

EP - 106

JO - Psychopharmacology

JF - Psychopharmacology

SN - 0033-3158

IS - 1

ER -