TY - JOUR
T1 - Racial differences in survival and response to therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
T2 - A secondary analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance A151931)
AU - Snyder, Rebecca A.
AU - He, Jun
AU - Le-Rademacher, Jennifer
AU - Ou, Fang Shu
AU - Dodge, Andrew B.
AU - Zemla, Tyler J.
AU - Paskett, Electra D.
AU - Chang, George J.
AU - Innocenti, Federico
AU - Blanke, Charles
AU - Lenz, Heinz Josef
AU - Polite, Blasé N.
AU - Venook, Alan P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Fang‐Shu Ou reports grants from the National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study. Electra D. Paskett reports grants from Merck Foundation, Pfizer, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and FoxConn Technology Group outside the submitted work. George J. Chang reports personal fees from Medicarold, 11 Health, and Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work. Heinz‐Josef Lenz reports personal fees from Merck KG, Bayer, and Genentech/Roche outside the submitted work. The remaining authors made no disclosures.
Funding Information:
The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (award numbers UG1CA189823, U10CA180821, and U10CA180882 to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology; and UG1CA232760, UG1CA233327, UG1CA233329, UG1CA233331, UG1CA233373, U10CA180888, and UG1CA180830 to the Southwest Oncology Group [ https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ]). The study also was supported in part by Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Genentech, Myriad, Pfizer, and Sanofi (to Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] 80405).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Cancer Society
PY - 2021/10/15
Y1 - 2021/10/15
N2 - Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between self-identified race and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy among patients enrolled in the randomized Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were identified by race. On the basis of covariates (treatment arm, KRAS status, sex, age, and body mass index), each Black patient was exact matched with a White patient. The association between race and OS and PFS was examined using a marginal Cox proportional hazard model for matched pairs. The interaction between KRAS status and race was tested in the model. The association between race and response to therapy and adverse events were examined using a marginal logistic regression model. Results: In total, 392 patients were matched and included in the final data set. No difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.16), PFS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78-1.20), or response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.52) was observed between Black and White patients. Patients with KRAS mutant status (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67), a performance statusscore of 1 (reference, a performance status of 0; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88), or ≥3 metastatic sites (reference, 1 metastatic site; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.22-2.28) experienced worse OS. Black patients experienced lower rates and risk of grade ≥3 fatigue (6.6% vs 13.3%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91) but were equally likely to be treated with a dose reduction (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.65). Conclusions: No difference in OS, PFS, or response to therapy was observed between Black patients and White patients in an equal treatment setting of the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized controlled trial. Lay Summary: Despite improvements in screening and treatment, studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in Black patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in cancer-specific outcomes among Black and White patients receiving equivalent treatment on the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized clinical trial. In this study, there was no difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, or response to therapy between Black and White patients treated on a clinical trial. These findings suggest that access to care and differences in treatment may be responsible for racial disparities in colorectal cancer.
AB - Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between self-identified race and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy among patients enrolled in the randomized Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were identified by race. On the basis of covariates (treatment arm, KRAS status, sex, age, and body mass index), each Black patient was exact matched with a White patient. The association between race and OS and PFS was examined using a marginal Cox proportional hazard model for matched pairs. The interaction between KRAS status and race was tested in the model. The association between race and response to therapy and adverse events were examined using a marginal logistic regression model. Results: In total, 392 patients were matched and included in the final data set. No difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.16), PFS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78-1.20), or response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.52) was observed between Black and White patients. Patients with KRAS mutant status (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67), a performance statusscore of 1 (reference, a performance status of 0; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88), or ≥3 metastatic sites (reference, 1 metastatic site; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.22-2.28) experienced worse OS. Black patients experienced lower rates and risk of grade ≥3 fatigue (6.6% vs 13.3%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91) but were equally likely to be treated with a dose reduction (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.65). Conclusions: No difference in OS, PFS, or response to therapy was observed between Black patients and White patients in an equal treatment setting of the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized controlled trial. Lay Summary: Despite improvements in screening and treatment, studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in Black patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in cancer-specific outcomes among Black and White patients receiving equivalent treatment on the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized clinical trial. In this study, there was no difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, or response to therapy between Black and White patients treated on a clinical trial. These findings suggest that access to care and differences in treatment may be responsible for racial disparities in colorectal cancer.
KW - clinical trial
KW - colorectal neoplasms
KW - continental population groups
KW - health care disparities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112045172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112045172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.33649
DO - 10.1002/cncr.33649
M3 - Article
C2 - 34374082
AN - SCOPUS:85112045172
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 127
SP - 3801
EP - 3808
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 20
ER -