Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting

Results from a statewide cancer screening program

Jun Li, Marion R. Nadel, Carolyn F. Poppell, Diane M. Dwyer, David Lieberman, Eileen K. Steinberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73 documented the bowel preparation quality and 82 documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87 and 53, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number419796
JournalDiagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Early Detection of Cancer
Information Systems
Polyps
Publications
Comorbidity
Colorectal Neoplasms
Pathology
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting : Results from a statewide cancer screening program. / Li, Jun; Nadel, Marion R.; Poppell, Carolyn F.; Dwyer, Diane M.; Lieberman, David; Steinberger, Eileen K.

In: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Jun ; Nadel, Marion R. ; Poppell, Carolyn F. ; Dwyer, Diane M. ; Lieberman, David ; Steinberger, Eileen K. / Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting : Results from a statewide cancer screening program. In: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy. 2010.
@article{4576cabd54cf478884f7fa2c088c4c83,
title = "Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: Results from a statewide cancer screening program",
abstract = "This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73 documented the bowel preparation quality and 82 documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87 and 53, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.",
author = "Jun Li and Nadel, {Marion R.} and Poppell, {Carolyn F.} and Dwyer, {Diane M.} and David Lieberman and Steinberger, {Eileen K.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1155/2010/419796",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy",
issn = "1070-3608",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting

T2 - Results from a statewide cancer screening program

AU - Li, Jun

AU - Nadel, Marion R.

AU - Poppell, Carolyn F.

AU - Dwyer, Diane M.

AU - Lieberman, David

AU - Steinberger, Eileen K.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73 documented the bowel preparation quality and 82 documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87 and 53, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.

AB - This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73 documented the bowel preparation quality and 82 documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87 and 53, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349259349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78349259349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2010/419796

DO - 10.1155/2010/419796

M3 - Article

JO - Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy

JF - Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy

SN - 1070-3608

M1 - 419796

ER -