Psychometric and clinical test-retest reliability of the halstead impairment index in a sample of healthy, young, normal men

Joseph Matarazzo, Arthur N. Wiens, Ruth G. Matarazzo, Steven G. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty-nine normal young men were administered the Halstead Battery and two additional tests commonly employed by neuropsychologists and were re-examined by the same instruments 20 weeks later. The results indicate that for our sample of normal Ss the classification of an individual as “normal” by the Halstead Impairment Index is a clinical judgment with a very high degree of reliability. Data from two comparison groups (patients with cerebrovascular disease and patients with chronic schizophrenia) lent support to this conclusion. A similar study with other samples of normal Ss as well as other better defined and matched psychiatric and brain-damaged Ss is needed both to cross-validate and to extend this finding in order to increase the practicing clinician’s confidence in his interpretation of an obtained value falling in the normal range for a given individual. Clinical neuropsychology is rapidly developing to the point that such validity (clinical reliability) for such individual judgments is no longer a hope but an increasingly more probable expectation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-49
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume158
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1974

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Neuropsychology
Psychiatry
Schizophrenia
Reference Values
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Psychometric and clinical test-retest reliability of the halstead impairment index in a sample of healthy, young, normal men. / Matarazzo, Joseph; Wiens, Arthur N.; Matarazzo, Ruth G.; Goldstein, Steven G.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 158, No. 1, 1974, p. 37-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matarazzo, Joseph ; Wiens, Arthur N. ; Matarazzo, Ruth G. ; Goldstein, Steven G. / Psychometric and clinical test-retest reliability of the halstead impairment index in a sample of healthy, young, normal men. In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1974 ; Vol. 158, No. 1. pp. 37-49.
@article{b3aca409e4624a2d812d17cecc5faf6e,
title = "Psychometric and clinical test-retest reliability of the halstead impairment index in a sample of healthy, young, normal men",
abstract = "Twenty-nine normal young men were administered the Halstead Battery and two additional tests commonly employed by neuropsychologists and were re-examined by the same instruments 20 weeks later. The results indicate that for our sample of normal Ss the classification of an individual as “normal” by the Halstead Impairment Index is a clinical judgment with a very high degree of reliability. Data from two comparison groups (patients with cerebrovascular disease and patients with chronic schizophrenia) lent support to this conclusion. A similar study with other samples of normal Ss as well as other better defined and matched psychiatric and brain-damaged Ss is needed both to cross-validate and to extend this finding in order to increase the practicing clinician’s confidence in his interpretation of an obtained value falling in the normal range for a given individual. Clinical neuropsychology is rapidly developing to the point that such validity (clinical reliability) for such individual judgments is no longer a hope but an increasingly more probable expectation.",
author = "Joseph Matarazzo and Wiens, {Arthur N.} and Matarazzo, {Ruth G.} and Goldstein, {Steven G.}",
year = "1974",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "37--49",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric and clinical test-retest reliability of the halstead impairment index in a sample of healthy, young, normal men

AU - Matarazzo, Joseph

AU - Wiens, Arthur N.

AU - Matarazzo, Ruth G.

AU - Goldstein, Steven G.

PY - 1974

Y1 - 1974

N2 - Twenty-nine normal young men were administered the Halstead Battery and two additional tests commonly employed by neuropsychologists and were re-examined by the same instruments 20 weeks later. The results indicate that for our sample of normal Ss the classification of an individual as “normal” by the Halstead Impairment Index is a clinical judgment with a very high degree of reliability. Data from two comparison groups (patients with cerebrovascular disease and patients with chronic schizophrenia) lent support to this conclusion. A similar study with other samples of normal Ss as well as other better defined and matched psychiatric and brain-damaged Ss is needed both to cross-validate and to extend this finding in order to increase the practicing clinician’s confidence in his interpretation of an obtained value falling in the normal range for a given individual. Clinical neuropsychology is rapidly developing to the point that such validity (clinical reliability) for such individual judgments is no longer a hope but an increasingly more probable expectation.

AB - Twenty-nine normal young men were administered the Halstead Battery and two additional tests commonly employed by neuropsychologists and were re-examined by the same instruments 20 weeks later. The results indicate that for our sample of normal Ss the classification of an individual as “normal” by the Halstead Impairment Index is a clinical judgment with a very high degree of reliability. Data from two comparison groups (patients with cerebrovascular disease and patients with chronic schizophrenia) lent support to this conclusion. A similar study with other samples of normal Ss as well as other better defined and matched psychiatric and brain-damaged Ss is needed both to cross-validate and to extend this finding in order to increase the practicing clinician’s confidence in his interpretation of an obtained value falling in the normal range for a given individual. Clinical neuropsychology is rapidly developing to the point that such validity (clinical reliability) for such individual judgments is no longer a hope but an increasingly more probable expectation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0015949159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0015949159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 37

EP - 49

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 1

ER -