Proportion and Patterns of Hospice Discharges in Medicare Advantage Compared to Medicare Fee-for-Service

Joan Teno, Thomas J. Christian, Pedro Gozalo, Michael Plotzke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: When Medicare Advantage (MA) patients elect hospice, all covered services are reimbursed under the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) program. This financial arrangement may incentivize MA plans to refer persons to hospice near end of life when costs of care typically rise. Objective: To characterize hospice discharge patterns for MA versus FFS patients and examine whether patterns differ by MA concentration across hospital referral regions (HRRs). Design and Measurement: The rate and pattern of live discharges and length of stay (LOS) between FFS and MA patients were examined. A multivariate mixed-effects model examined whether hospice patients in MA versus FFS had differential patterns of discharges. In addition, we tested whether concentrations of MA hospice patients in a patient's HRR were associated with different patterns of discharges. Results: In fiscal year 2014, there were 1,199,533 hospice discharges with 331,142 MA patients having a slightly higher live discharge rate (15.8%) compared to 868,391 FFS hospice discharges (15.4%). After controlling for patient characteristics, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.02). MA patients were less likely to have early live discharges (AOR 0.87 95% CI 0.84-0.91) and burdensome transitions (AOR 0.61 95% CI 0.58-0.64) but did not differ in live discharges post 210 days. Among hospice deaths, MA hospice patients were less likely to have a three-day or less LOS (AOR 0.95 95% 0.94-0.96) and a LOS exceeding 180 days (AOR 0.97 95% 0.96-0.99). The concentration of MA patients in a HRR had minimal impact. Conclusion: MA hospice patients' discharge patterns raised less concerns than FFS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)302-306
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of palliative medicine
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicare Part C
Fee-for-Service Plans
Hospices
Medicare
Odds Ratio
Length of Stay
Referral and Consultation
Patient Discharge

Keywords

  • fee-for-service
  • hospice
  • live discharge
  • Medicare Advantage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Proportion and Patterns of Hospice Discharges in Medicare Advantage Compared to Medicare Fee-for-Service. / Teno, Joan; Christian, Thomas J.; Gozalo, Pedro; Plotzke, Michael.

In: Journal of palliative medicine, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 302-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Teno, Joan ; Christian, Thomas J. ; Gozalo, Pedro ; Plotzke, Michael. / Proportion and Patterns of Hospice Discharges in Medicare Advantage Compared to Medicare Fee-for-Service. In: Journal of palliative medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 302-306.
@article{29509c4a585c4f4d84ead6a2d186abee,
title = "Proportion and Patterns of Hospice Discharges in Medicare Advantage Compared to Medicare Fee-for-Service",
abstract = "Background: When Medicare Advantage (MA) patients elect hospice, all covered services are reimbursed under the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) program. This financial arrangement may incentivize MA plans to refer persons to hospice near end of life when costs of care typically rise. Objective: To characterize hospice discharge patterns for MA versus FFS patients and examine whether patterns differ by MA concentration across hospital referral regions (HRRs). Design and Measurement: The rate and pattern of live discharges and length of stay (LOS) between FFS and MA patients were examined. A multivariate mixed-effects model examined whether hospice patients in MA versus FFS had differential patterns of discharges. In addition, we tested whether concentrations of MA hospice patients in a patient's HRR were associated with different patterns of discharges. Results: In fiscal year 2014, there were 1,199,533 hospice discharges with 331,142 MA patients having a slightly higher live discharge rate (15.8{\%}) compared to 868,391 FFS hospice discharges (15.4{\%}). After controlling for patient characteristics, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.01 (95{\%} CI 0.99-1.02). MA patients were less likely to have early live discharges (AOR 0.87 95{\%} CI 0.84-0.91) and burdensome transitions (AOR 0.61 95{\%} CI 0.58-0.64) but did not differ in live discharges post 210 days. Among hospice deaths, MA hospice patients were less likely to have a three-day or less LOS (AOR 0.95 95{\%} 0.94-0.96) and a LOS exceeding 180 days (AOR 0.97 95{\%} 0.96-0.99). The concentration of MA patients in a HRR had minimal impact. Conclusion: MA hospice patients' discharge patterns raised less concerns than FFS.",
keywords = "fee-for-service, hospice, live discharge, Medicare Advantage",
author = "Joan Teno and Christian, {Thomas J.} and Pedro Gozalo and Michael Plotzke",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2017.0046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "302--306",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proportion and Patterns of Hospice Discharges in Medicare Advantage Compared to Medicare Fee-for-Service

AU - Teno, Joan

AU - Christian, Thomas J.

AU - Gozalo, Pedro

AU - Plotzke, Michael

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Background: When Medicare Advantage (MA) patients elect hospice, all covered services are reimbursed under the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) program. This financial arrangement may incentivize MA plans to refer persons to hospice near end of life when costs of care typically rise. Objective: To characterize hospice discharge patterns for MA versus FFS patients and examine whether patterns differ by MA concentration across hospital referral regions (HRRs). Design and Measurement: The rate and pattern of live discharges and length of stay (LOS) between FFS and MA patients were examined. A multivariate mixed-effects model examined whether hospice patients in MA versus FFS had differential patterns of discharges. In addition, we tested whether concentrations of MA hospice patients in a patient's HRR were associated with different patterns of discharges. Results: In fiscal year 2014, there were 1,199,533 hospice discharges with 331,142 MA patients having a slightly higher live discharge rate (15.8%) compared to 868,391 FFS hospice discharges (15.4%). After controlling for patient characteristics, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.02). MA patients were less likely to have early live discharges (AOR 0.87 95% CI 0.84-0.91) and burdensome transitions (AOR 0.61 95% CI 0.58-0.64) but did not differ in live discharges post 210 days. Among hospice deaths, MA hospice patients were less likely to have a three-day or less LOS (AOR 0.95 95% 0.94-0.96) and a LOS exceeding 180 days (AOR 0.97 95% 0.96-0.99). The concentration of MA patients in a HRR had minimal impact. Conclusion: MA hospice patients' discharge patterns raised less concerns than FFS.

AB - Background: When Medicare Advantage (MA) patients elect hospice, all covered services are reimbursed under the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) program. This financial arrangement may incentivize MA plans to refer persons to hospice near end of life when costs of care typically rise. Objective: To characterize hospice discharge patterns for MA versus FFS patients and examine whether patterns differ by MA concentration across hospital referral regions (HRRs). Design and Measurement: The rate and pattern of live discharges and length of stay (LOS) between FFS and MA patients were examined. A multivariate mixed-effects model examined whether hospice patients in MA versus FFS had differential patterns of discharges. In addition, we tested whether concentrations of MA hospice patients in a patient's HRR were associated with different patterns of discharges. Results: In fiscal year 2014, there were 1,199,533 hospice discharges with 331,142 MA patients having a slightly higher live discharge rate (15.8%) compared to 868,391 FFS hospice discharges (15.4%). After controlling for patient characteristics, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.02). MA patients were less likely to have early live discharges (AOR 0.87 95% CI 0.84-0.91) and burdensome transitions (AOR 0.61 95% CI 0.58-0.64) but did not differ in live discharges post 210 days. Among hospice deaths, MA hospice patients were less likely to have a three-day or less LOS (AOR 0.95 95% 0.94-0.96) and a LOS exceeding 180 days (AOR 0.97 95% 0.96-0.99). The concentration of MA patients in a HRR had minimal impact. Conclusion: MA hospice patients' discharge patterns raised less concerns than FFS.

KW - fee-for-service

KW - hospice

KW - live discharge

KW - Medicare Advantage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045430722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045430722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2017.0046

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2017.0046

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045430722

VL - 21

SP - 302

EP - 306

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 3

ER -