Proactive tobacco treatment for low income smokers: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Steven S. Fu, Michelle van Ryn, Diana J. Burgess, David Nelson, Barbara Clothier, Janet L. Thomas, John A. Nyman, Anne M. Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a high prevalence of smoking and high burden of tobacco-related diseases among low-income populations. Effective, evidenced-based smoking cessation treatments are available, but low-income smokers are less likely than higher-income smokers to use these treatments, especially the most comprehensive forms that include a combination of pharmacotherapy and intensive behavioral counseling. Methods/Design. The primary objectives of this randomized controlled trial are to compare the effects of a proactive tobacco treatment intervention compared to usual care on population-level smoking abstinence rates and tobacco treatment utilization rates among a diverse population of low-income smokers, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of proactive tobacco treatment intervention. The proactive care intervention systematically offers low-income smokers free and easy access to evidence-based treatments and has two primary components: (1) proactive outreach to current smokers in the form of mailed invitation materials and telephone calls containing targeted health messages, and (2) facilitated access to free, comprehensive, evidence-based tobacco cessation treatments in the form of NRT and intensive, telephone-based behavioral counseling. The study aims to include a population-based sample (N = 2500) of adult smokers enrolled in the Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP), a state-funded health insurance plan for low-income persons. Baseline data is obtained from MHCP administrative databases and a participant survey that is conducted prior to randomization. Outcome data is collected from a follow-up survey conducted 12 months after randomization and MHCP administrative data. The primary outcome is six-month prolonged smoking abstinence at one year and is assessed at the population level. All randomized individuals are asked to complete the follow-up survey, regardless of whether they participated in tobacco treatment. Data analysis of the primary aims will follow intent-to-treat methodology. Discussion. There is a critical need to increase access to effective tobacco dependence treatments. This randomized trial evaluates the effects of proactive outreach coupled with free NRT and telephone counseling on the population impact of tobacco dependence treatment. If proven to be effective and cost-effective, national dissemination of proactive treatment approaches would reduce tobacco-related morbidity, mortality, and health care costs for low income Americans. Clinical trials registration. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01123967.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number337
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 9 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tobacco
Randomized Controlled Trials
Telephone
Counseling
Tobacco Use Disorder
Withholding Treatment
Therapeutics
Smoking
Poverty
Random Allocation
Delivery of Health Care
Population
Tobacco Use Cessation
Smoking Cessation
Health Insurance
Health Care Costs
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Clinical Trials
Databases
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Health care disparities
  • Low-income population
  • Minority health
  • Smoking cessation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Proactive tobacco treatment for low income smokers : Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. / Fu, Steven S.; van Ryn, Michelle; Burgess, Diana J.; Nelson, David; Clothier, Barbara; Thomas, Janet L.; Nyman, John A.; Joseph, Anne M.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 14, No. 1, 337, 09.04.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fu, SS, van Ryn, M, Burgess, DJ, Nelson, D, Clothier, B, Thomas, JL, Nyman, JA & Joseph, AM 2014, 'Proactive tobacco treatment for low income smokers: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial', BMC Public Health, vol. 14, no. 1, 337. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-337
Fu, Steven S. ; van Ryn, Michelle ; Burgess, Diana J. ; Nelson, David ; Clothier, Barbara ; Thomas, Janet L. ; Nyman, John A. ; Joseph, Anne M. / Proactive tobacco treatment for low income smokers : Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. In: BMC Public Health. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{c4c94075a49d49c3b24566c05cf322fc,
title = "Proactive tobacco treatment for low income smokers: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: There is a high prevalence of smoking and high burden of tobacco-related diseases among low-income populations. Effective, evidenced-based smoking cessation treatments are available, but low-income smokers are less likely than higher-income smokers to use these treatments, especially the most comprehensive forms that include a combination of pharmacotherapy and intensive behavioral counseling. Methods/Design. The primary objectives of this randomized controlled trial are to compare the effects of a proactive tobacco treatment intervention compared to usual care on population-level smoking abstinence rates and tobacco treatment utilization rates among a diverse population of low-income smokers, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of proactive tobacco treatment intervention. The proactive care intervention systematically offers low-income smokers free and easy access to evidence-based treatments and has two primary components: (1) proactive outreach to current smokers in the form of mailed invitation materials and telephone calls containing targeted health messages, and (2) facilitated access to free, comprehensive, evidence-based tobacco cessation treatments in the form of NRT and intensive, telephone-based behavioral counseling. The study aims to include a population-based sample (N = 2500) of adult smokers enrolled in the Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP), a state-funded health insurance plan for low-income persons. Baseline data is obtained from MHCP administrative databases and a participant survey that is conducted prior to randomization. Outcome data is collected from a follow-up survey conducted 12 months after randomization and MHCP administrative data. The primary outcome is six-month prolonged smoking abstinence at one year and is assessed at the population level. All randomized individuals are asked to complete the follow-up survey, regardless of whether they participated in tobacco treatment. Data analysis of the primary aims will follow intent-to-treat methodology. Discussion. There is a critical need to increase access to effective tobacco dependence treatments. This randomized trial evaluates the effects of proactive outreach coupled with free NRT and telephone counseling on the population impact of tobacco dependence treatment. If proven to be effective and cost-effective, national dissemination of proactive treatment approaches would reduce tobacco-related morbidity, mortality, and health care costs for low income Americans. Clinical trials registration. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01123967.",
keywords = "Health care disparities, Low-income population, Minority health, Smoking cessation",
author = "Fu, {Steven S.} and {van Ryn}, Michelle and Burgess, {Diana J.} and David Nelson and Barbara Clothier and Thomas, {Janet L.} and Nyman, {John A.} and Joseph, {Anne M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-14-337",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proactive tobacco treatment for low income smokers

T2 - Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

AU - Fu, Steven S.

AU - van Ryn, Michelle

AU - Burgess, Diana J.

AU - Nelson, David

AU - Clothier, Barbara

AU - Thomas, Janet L.

AU - Nyman, John A.

AU - Joseph, Anne M.

PY - 2014/4/9

Y1 - 2014/4/9

N2 - Background: There is a high prevalence of smoking and high burden of tobacco-related diseases among low-income populations. Effective, evidenced-based smoking cessation treatments are available, but low-income smokers are less likely than higher-income smokers to use these treatments, especially the most comprehensive forms that include a combination of pharmacotherapy and intensive behavioral counseling. Methods/Design. The primary objectives of this randomized controlled trial are to compare the effects of a proactive tobacco treatment intervention compared to usual care on population-level smoking abstinence rates and tobacco treatment utilization rates among a diverse population of low-income smokers, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of proactive tobacco treatment intervention. The proactive care intervention systematically offers low-income smokers free and easy access to evidence-based treatments and has two primary components: (1) proactive outreach to current smokers in the form of mailed invitation materials and telephone calls containing targeted health messages, and (2) facilitated access to free, comprehensive, evidence-based tobacco cessation treatments in the form of NRT and intensive, telephone-based behavioral counseling. The study aims to include a population-based sample (N = 2500) of adult smokers enrolled in the Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP), a state-funded health insurance plan for low-income persons. Baseline data is obtained from MHCP administrative databases and a participant survey that is conducted prior to randomization. Outcome data is collected from a follow-up survey conducted 12 months after randomization and MHCP administrative data. The primary outcome is six-month prolonged smoking abstinence at one year and is assessed at the population level. All randomized individuals are asked to complete the follow-up survey, regardless of whether they participated in tobacco treatment. Data analysis of the primary aims will follow intent-to-treat methodology. Discussion. There is a critical need to increase access to effective tobacco dependence treatments. This randomized trial evaluates the effects of proactive outreach coupled with free NRT and telephone counseling on the population impact of tobacco dependence treatment. If proven to be effective and cost-effective, national dissemination of proactive treatment approaches would reduce tobacco-related morbidity, mortality, and health care costs for low income Americans. Clinical trials registration. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01123967.

AB - Background: There is a high prevalence of smoking and high burden of tobacco-related diseases among low-income populations. Effective, evidenced-based smoking cessation treatments are available, but low-income smokers are less likely than higher-income smokers to use these treatments, especially the most comprehensive forms that include a combination of pharmacotherapy and intensive behavioral counseling. Methods/Design. The primary objectives of this randomized controlled trial are to compare the effects of a proactive tobacco treatment intervention compared to usual care on population-level smoking abstinence rates and tobacco treatment utilization rates among a diverse population of low-income smokers, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of proactive tobacco treatment intervention. The proactive care intervention systematically offers low-income smokers free and easy access to evidence-based treatments and has two primary components: (1) proactive outreach to current smokers in the form of mailed invitation materials and telephone calls containing targeted health messages, and (2) facilitated access to free, comprehensive, evidence-based tobacco cessation treatments in the form of NRT and intensive, telephone-based behavioral counseling. The study aims to include a population-based sample (N = 2500) of adult smokers enrolled in the Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP), a state-funded health insurance plan for low-income persons. Baseline data is obtained from MHCP administrative databases and a participant survey that is conducted prior to randomization. Outcome data is collected from a follow-up survey conducted 12 months after randomization and MHCP administrative data. The primary outcome is six-month prolonged smoking abstinence at one year and is assessed at the population level. All randomized individuals are asked to complete the follow-up survey, regardless of whether they participated in tobacco treatment. Data analysis of the primary aims will follow intent-to-treat methodology. Discussion. There is a critical need to increase access to effective tobacco dependence treatments. This randomized trial evaluates the effects of proactive outreach coupled with free NRT and telephone counseling on the population impact of tobacco dependence treatment. If proven to be effective and cost-effective, national dissemination of proactive treatment approaches would reduce tobacco-related morbidity, mortality, and health care costs for low income Americans. Clinical trials registration. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01123967.

KW - Health care disparities

KW - Low-income population

KW - Minority health

KW - Smoking cessation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899494217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899494217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-337

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-337

M3 - Article

C2 - 24716466

AN - SCOPUS:84899494217

VL - 14

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 337

ER -