Pressure, Fluid and Anatomical Characteristics of Abdominoscrotal Hydroceles in Infants

Aaron Bayne, Darius Paduch, Steven Skoog

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele is a poorly understood entity and multiple theories attempt to explain its occurrence. To our knowledge the factors contributing to the formation of abdominoscrotal hydrocele are unknown, as are its cellular, biochemical and hydrostatic properties. We prospectively evaluated abdominoscrotal hydrocele at surgery to define its cause and its effects on the testicle. Materials and Methods: Six patients (9 abdominoscrotal hydroceles) were prospectively evaluated at surgery. Hydrocele volume was recorded as well as simultaneous hydrocele and bladder pressure. Fluid at surgery was sent for biochemical and cellular analysis. Testicular and epididymal abnormalities were noted and testicular length was measured. All abdominoscrotal hydroceles were exteriorized and excised. Processus vaginalis patency was documented at repair. Results: Mean patient age was 7.17 months (range 5 to 12). The mean volume recorded was 212.78 ml (range 80 to 320). Mean corrected hydrocele pressure was 15.44 cm H2O (range 7 to 28). Mean testicular length was 3.6 cm (range 2.2 to 5.5). All patients had epididymal anomalies and 2 of the 3 unilateral abdominoscrotal hydroceles had abnormal contralateral scrotal findings. In no case was a peritoneal communication identified. Fluid analysis revealed a high protein concentration (mean 4.94 gm/dl), low triglyceride concentration (mean 20.29 mg/dl) and lactate dehydrogenase levels comparable to those in normal serum (mean 99.14 U/l). Cytological analysis revealed a sterile, low cellularity fluid with a macrophage predominance (mean 84.71%). Conclusions: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele occurs as a result of increased intraluminal pressure confined in a proximal closed processus vaginalis. Increased hydrocele pressure allows expansion into the retroperitoneal space through the internal inguinal ring. This increased pressure is associated with testicular elongation and epididymal abnormalities. The exudative fluid is of a noninfectious etiology and it suggests an altered filtration process. To our knowledge the effects on future fertility are unknown.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1720-1723
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume180
Issue number4 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Pressure
Inguinal Canal
Retroperitoneal Space
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
Fertility
Testis
Urinary Bladder
Triglycerides
Macrophages
Communication
Serum
Proteins

Keywords

  • abdomen
  • abnormalities
  • scrotum
  • testicular hydrocele
  • testis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Pressure, Fluid and Anatomical Characteristics of Abdominoscrotal Hydroceles in Infants. / Bayne, Aaron; Paduch, Darius; Skoog, Steven.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 180, No. 4 SUPPL., 10.2008, p. 1720-1723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bayne, Aaron ; Paduch, Darius ; Skoog, Steven. / Pressure, Fluid and Anatomical Characteristics of Abdominoscrotal Hydroceles in Infants. In: Journal of Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 180, No. 4 SUPPL. pp. 1720-1723.
@article{398bedd9e8fe48c59e8b9da94f5bbf16,
title = "Pressure, Fluid and Anatomical Characteristics of Abdominoscrotal Hydroceles in Infants",
abstract = "Purpose: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele is a poorly understood entity and multiple theories attempt to explain its occurrence. To our knowledge the factors contributing to the formation of abdominoscrotal hydrocele are unknown, as are its cellular, biochemical and hydrostatic properties. We prospectively evaluated abdominoscrotal hydrocele at surgery to define its cause and its effects on the testicle. Materials and Methods: Six patients (9 abdominoscrotal hydroceles) were prospectively evaluated at surgery. Hydrocele volume was recorded as well as simultaneous hydrocele and bladder pressure. Fluid at surgery was sent for biochemical and cellular analysis. Testicular and epididymal abnormalities were noted and testicular length was measured. All abdominoscrotal hydroceles were exteriorized and excised. Processus vaginalis patency was documented at repair. Results: Mean patient age was 7.17 months (range 5 to 12). The mean volume recorded was 212.78 ml (range 80 to 320). Mean corrected hydrocele pressure was 15.44 cm H2O (range 7 to 28). Mean testicular length was 3.6 cm (range 2.2 to 5.5). All patients had epididymal anomalies and 2 of the 3 unilateral abdominoscrotal hydroceles had abnormal contralateral scrotal findings. In no case was a peritoneal communication identified. Fluid analysis revealed a high protein concentration (mean 4.94 gm/dl), low triglyceride concentration (mean 20.29 mg/dl) and lactate dehydrogenase levels comparable to those in normal serum (mean 99.14 U/l). Cytological analysis revealed a sterile, low cellularity fluid with a macrophage predominance (mean 84.71{\%}). Conclusions: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele occurs as a result of increased intraluminal pressure confined in a proximal closed processus vaginalis. Increased hydrocele pressure allows expansion into the retroperitoneal space through the internal inguinal ring. This increased pressure is associated with testicular elongation and epididymal abnormalities. The exudative fluid is of a noninfectious etiology and it suggests an altered filtration process. To our knowledge the effects on future fertility are unknown.",
keywords = "abdomen, abnormalities, scrotum, testicular hydrocele, testis",
author = "Aaron Bayne and Darius Paduch and Steven Skoog",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.086",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "180",
pages = "1720--1723",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pressure, Fluid and Anatomical Characteristics of Abdominoscrotal Hydroceles in Infants

AU - Bayne, Aaron

AU - Paduch, Darius

AU - Skoog, Steven

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Purpose: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele is a poorly understood entity and multiple theories attempt to explain its occurrence. To our knowledge the factors contributing to the formation of abdominoscrotal hydrocele are unknown, as are its cellular, biochemical and hydrostatic properties. We prospectively evaluated abdominoscrotal hydrocele at surgery to define its cause and its effects on the testicle. Materials and Methods: Six patients (9 abdominoscrotal hydroceles) were prospectively evaluated at surgery. Hydrocele volume was recorded as well as simultaneous hydrocele and bladder pressure. Fluid at surgery was sent for biochemical and cellular analysis. Testicular and epididymal abnormalities were noted and testicular length was measured. All abdominoscrotal hydroceles were exteriorized and excised. Processus vaginalis patency was documented at repair. Results: Mean patient age was 7.17 months (range 5 to 12). The mean volume recorded was 212.78 ml (range 80 to 320). Mean corrected hydrocele pressure was 15.44 cm H2O (range 7 to 28). Mean testicular length was 3.6 cm (range 2.2 to 5.5). All patients had epididymal anomalies and 2 of the 3 unilateral abdominoscrotal hydroceles had abnormal contralateral scrotal findings. In no case was a peritoneal communication identified. Fluid analysis revealed a high protein concentration (mean 4.94 gm/dl), low triglyceride concentration (mean 20.29 mg/dl) and lactate dehydrogenase levels comparable to those in normal serum (mean 99.14 U/l). Cytological analysis revealed a sterile, low cellularity fluid with a macrophage predominance (mean 84.71%). Conclusions: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele occurs as a result of increased intraluminal pressure confined in a proximal closed processus vaginalis. Increased hydrocele pressure allows expansion into the retroperitoneal space through the internal inguinal ring. This increased pressure is associated with testicular elongation and epididymal abnormalities. The exudative fluid is of a noninfectious etiology and it suggests an altered filtration process. To our knowledge the effects on future fertility are unknown.

AB - Purpose: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele is a poorly understood entity and multiple theories attempt to explain its occurrence. To our knowledge the factors contributing to the formation of abdominoscrotal hydrocele are unknown, as are its cellular, biochemical and hydrostatic properties. We prospectively evaluated abdominoscrotal hydrocele at surgery to define its cause and its effects on the testicle. Materials and Methods: Six patients (9 abdominoscrotal hydroceles) were prospectively evaluated at surgery. Hydrocele volume was recorded as well as simultaneous hydrocele and bladder pressure. Fluid at surgery was sent for biochemical and cellular analysis. Testicular and epididymal abnormalities were noted and testicular length was measured. All abdominoscrotal hydroceles were exteriorized and excised. Processus vaginalis patency was documented at repair. Results: Mean patient age was 7.17 months (range 5 to 12). The mean volume recorded was 212.78 ml (range 80 to 320). Mean corrected hydrocele pressure was 15.44 cm H2O (range 7 to 28). Mean testicular length was 3.6 cm (range 2.2 to 5.5). All patients had epididymal anomalies and 2 of the 3 unilateral abdominoscrotal hydroceles had abnormal contralateral scrotal findings. In no case was a peritoneal communication identified. Fluid analysis revealed a high protein concentration (mean 4.94 gm/dl), low triglyceride concentration (mean 20.29 mg/dl) and lactate dehydrogenase levels comparable to those in normal serum (mean 99.14 U/l). Cytological analysis revealed a sterile, low cellularity fluid with a macrophage predominance (mean 84.71%). Conclusions: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele occurs as a result of increased intraluminal pressure confined in a proximal closed processus vaginalis. Increased hydrocele pressure allows expansion into the retroperitoneal space through the internal inguinal ring. This increased pressure is associated with testicular elongation and epididymal abnormalities. The exudative fluid is of a noninfectious etiology and it suggests an altered filtration process. To our knowledge the effects on future fertility are unknown.

KW - abdomen

KW - abnormalities

KW - scrotum

KW - testicular hydrocele

KW - testis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249120291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51249120291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.086

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.086

M3 - Article

C2 - 18708213

AN - SCOPUS:51249120291

VL - 180

SP - 1720

EP - 1723

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -