Predictors of Student Success in Graduate Biomedical Informatics Training: Introductory Course and Program Success

Irmgard U. Willcockson, Craig W. Johnson, William (Bill) Hersh, Elmer V. Bernstam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To predict student performance in an introductory graduate-level biomedical informatics course from application data. Design: A predictive model built through retrospective review of student records using hierarchical binary logistic regression with half of the sample held back for cross-validation. The model was also validated against student data from a similar course at a second institution. Measurements: Earning an A grade (Mastery) or a C grade (Failure) in an introductory informatics course. Results: The authors analyzed 129 student records at the University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston (SHIS) and 106 at Oregon Health and Science University Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology (DMICE). In the SHIS cross-validation sample, the Graduate Record Exam verbal score (GRE-V) correctly predicted Mastery in 69.4%. Undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) and underrepresented minority status (URMS) predicted 81.6% of Failures. At DMICE, GRE-V, UGPA, and prior graduate degree significantly correlated with Mastery. Only GRE-V was a significant independent predictor of Mastery at both institutions. There were too few URMS students and Failures at DMICE to analyze. Course Mastery strongly predicted program performance defined as final cumulative GPA at SHIS (n = 19, r = 0.634, r2 = 0.40, p = 0.0036) and DMICE (n = 106, r = 0.603, r2 = 0.36, p <0.001). Conclusions: The authors identified predictors of performance in an introductory informatics course including GRE-V, UGPA and URMS. Course performance was a very strong predictor of overall program performance. Findings may be useful for selecting students for admission and identifying students at risk for Failure as early as possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-846
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Informatics
Medical Informatics
Students
Information Science
School Health Services
Epidemiology
Logistic Models
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Predictors of Student Success in Graduate Biomedical Informatics Training : Introductory Course and Program Success. / Willcockson, Irmgard U.; Johnson, Craig W.; Hersh, William (Bill); Bernstam, Elmer V.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 16, No. 6, 11.2009, p. 837-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7cc98f5e9cd4b22a0ede62e6c60a173,
title = "Predictors of Student Success in Graduate Biomedical Informatics Training: Introductory Course and Program Success",
abstract = "Objective: To predict student performance in an introductory graduate-level biomedical informatics course from application data. Design: A predictive model built through retrospective review of student records using hierarchical binary logistic regression with half of the sample held back for cross-validation. The model was also validated against student data from a similar course at a second institution. Measurements: Earning an A grade (Mastery) or a C grade (Failure) in an introductory informatics course. Results: The authors analyzed 129 student records at the University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston (SHIS) and 106 at Oregon Health and Science University Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology (DMICE). In the SHIS cross-validation sample, the Graduate Record Exam verbal score (GRE-V) correctly predicted Mastery in 69.4{\%}. Undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) and underrepresented minority status (URMS) predicted 81.6{\%} of Failures. At DMICE, GRE-V, UGPA, and prior graduate degree significantly correlated with Mastery. Only GRE-V was a significant independent predictor of Mastery at both institutions. There were too few URMS students and Failures at DMICE to analyze. Course Mastery strongly predicted program performance defined as final cumulative GPA at SHIS (n = 19, r = 0.634, r2 = 0.40, p = 0.0036) and DMICE (n = 106, r = 0.603, r2 = 0.36, p <0.001). Conclusions: The authors identified predictors of performance in an introductory informatics course including GRE-V, UGPA and URMS. Course performance was a very strong predictor of overall program performance. Findings may be useful for selecting students for admission and identifying students at risk for Failure as early as possible.",
author = "Willcockson, {Irmgard U.} and Johnson, {Craig W.} and Hersh, {William (Bill)} and Bernstam, {Elmer V.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1197/jamia.M2895",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "837--846",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of Student Success in Graduate Biomedical Informatics Training

T2 - Introductory Course and Program Success

AU - Willcockson, Irmgard U.

AU - Johnson, Craig W.

AU - Hersh, William (Bill)

AU - Bernstam, Elmer V.

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Objective: To predict student performance in an introductory graduate-level biomedical informatics course from application data. Design: A predictive model built through retrospective review of student records using hierarchical binary logistic regression with half of the sample held back for cross-validation. The model was also validated against student data from a similar course at a second institution. Measurements: Earning an A grade (Mastery) or a C grade (Failure) in an introductory informatics course. Results: The authors analyzed 129 student records at the University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston (SHIS) and 106 at Oregon Health and Science University Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology (DMICE). In the SHIS cross-validation sample, the Graduate Record Exam verbal score (GRE-V) correctly predicted Mastery in 69.4%. Undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) and underrepresented minority status (URMS) predicted 81.6% of Failures. At DMICE, GRE-V, UGPA, and prior graduate degree significantly correlated with Mastery. Only GRE-V was a significant independent predictor of Mastery at both institutions. There were too few URMS students and Failures at DMICE to analyze. Course Mastery strongly predicted program performance defined as final cumulative GPA at SHIS (n = 19, r = 0.634, r2 = 0.40, p = 0.0036) and DMICE (n = 106, r = 0.603, r2 = 0.36, p <0.001). Conclusions: The authors identified predictors of performance in an introductory informatics course including GRE-V, UGPA and URMS. Course performance was a very strong predictor of overall program performance. Findings may be useful for selecting students for admission and identifying students at risk for Failure as early as possible.

AB - Objective: To predict student performance in an introductory graduate-level biomedical informatics course from application data. Design: A predictive model built through retrospective review of student records using hierarchical binary logistic regression with half of the sample held back for cross-validation. The model was also validated against student data from a similar course at a second institution. Measurements: Earning an A grade (Mastery) or a C grade (Failure) in an introductory informatics course. Results: The authors analyzed 129 student records at the University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston (SHIS) and 106 at Oregon Health and Science University Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology (DMICE). In the SHIS cross-validation sample, the Graduate Record Exam verbal score (GRE-V) correctly predicted Mastery in 69.4%. Undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) and underrepresented minority status (URMS) predicted 81.6% of Failures. At DMICE, GRE-V, UGPA, and prior graduate degree significantly correlated with Mastery. Only GRE-V was a significant independent predictor of Mastery at both institutions. There were too few URMS students and Failures at DMICE to analyze. Course Mastery strongly predicted program performance defined as final cumulative GPA at SHIS (n = 19, r = 0.634, r2 = 0.40, p = 0.0036) and DMICE (n = 106, r = 0.603, r2 = 0.36, p <0.001). Conclusions: The authors identified predictors of performance in an introductory informatics course including GRE-V, UGPA and URMS. Course performance was a very strong predictor of overall program performance. Findings may be useful for selecting students for admission and identifying students at risk for Failure as early as possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350456128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350456128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/jamia.M2895

DO - 10.1197/jamia.M2895

M3 - Article

C2 - 19717804

AN - SCOPUS:70350456128

VL - 16

SP - 837

EP - 846

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 6

ER -