Practice patterns in the management of patients with esophageal strictures and rings{A figure is presented}

Jeffrey S. Olson, David Lieberman, Amnon Sonnenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Only few data exist on the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Objective: To study the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Endoscopic data repository of U.S. gastroenterology practices from 1998 to 2003 (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative). Patients: Case subjects included 7287 patients with strictures and 4993 patients with rings. The control group consisted of 124,120 patients without endoscopic evidence of esophageal stenosis. Interventions: Esophageal dilation. Main Outcome Measurements: Patient demographics, types and diameters of esophageal dilators, frequency of repeat dilations. Results: Strictures displayed a male predominance, and rings displayed a small female predominance. Compared with the control population, strictures and rings both occurred most frequently in elderly white patients. Dysphagia and reflux were the most common indications for dilation in both conditions. Compared with strictures, rings were treated more often with larger dilators and rubber bougies. One-year rates of repeat dilation for strictures and rings were 13% and 4%, respectively. The mean interval length between repeat dilations was 82 days for strictures and 184 days for rings. Limitations: Only a limited amount of information about individual patients was retrievable from the electronic database. Conclusions: The variations in the demographic characteristics and the treatment practice allude to differences in the underlying pathophysiology of these 2 benign obstructing lesions of the esophagus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)670-675
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Esophageal Stenosis
Pathologic Constriction
Dilatation
Epidemiology
Demography
Rubber
Gastroenterology
Deglutition Disorders
Esophagus
Case-Control Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Control Groups
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Practice patterns in the management of patients with esophageal strictures and rings{A figure is presented}. / Olson, Jeffrey S.; Lieberman, David; Sonnenberg, Amnon.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 66, No. 4, 10.2007, p. 670-675.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99991a724a26498c817f29ffd7d2b6e8,
title = "Practice patterns in the management of patients with esophageal strictures and rings{A figure is presented}",
abstract = "Background: Only few data exist on the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Objective: To study the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Endoscopic data repository of U.S. gastroenterology practices from 1998 to 2003 (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative). Patients: Case subjects included 7287 patients with strictures and 4993 patients with rings. The control group consisted of 124,120 patients without endoscopic evidence of esophageal stenosis. Interventions: Esophageal dilation. Main Outcome Measurements: Patient demographics, types and diameters of esophageal dilators, frequency of repeat dilations. Results: Strictures displayed a male predominance, and rings displayed a small female predominance. Compared with the control population, strictures and rings both occurred most frequently in elderly white patients. Dysphagia and reflux were the most common indications for dilation in both conditions. Compared with strictures, rings were treated more often with larger dilators and rubber bougies. One-year rates of repeat dilation for strictures and rings were 13{\%} and 4{\%}, respectively. The mean interval length between repeat dilations was 82 days for strictures and 184 days for rings. Limitations: Only a limited amount of information about individual patients was retrievable from the electronic database. Conclusions: The variations in the demographic characteristics and the treatment practice allude to differences in the underlying pathophysiology of these 2 benign obstructing lesions of the esophagus.",
author = "Olson, {Jeffrey S.} and David Lieberman and Amnon Sonnenberg",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "670--675",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice patterns in the management of patients with esophageal strictures and rings{A figure is presented}

AU - Olson, Jeffrey S.

AU - Lieberman, David

AU - Sonnenberg, Amnon

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Background: Only few data exist on the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Objective: To study the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Endoscopic data repository of U.S. gastroenterology practices from 1998 to 2003 (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative). Patients: Case subjects included 7287 patients with strictures and 4993 patients with rings. The control group consisted of 124,120 patients without endoscopic evidence of esophageal stenosis. Interventions: Esophageal dilation. Main Outcome Measurements: Patient demographics, types and diameters of esophageal dilators, frequency of repeat dilations. Results: Strictures displayed a male predominance, and rings displayed a small female predominance. Compared with the control population, strictures and rings both occurred most frequently in elderly white patients. Dysphagia and reflux were the most common indications for dilation in both conditions. Compared with strictures, rings were treated more often with larger dilators and rubber bougies. One-year rates of repeat dilation for strictures and rings were 13% and 4%, respectively. The mean interval length between repeat dilations was 82 days for strictures and 184 days for rings. Limitations: Only a limited amount of information about individual patients was retrievable from the electronic database. Conclusions: The variations in the demographic characteristics and the treatment practice allude to differences in the underlying pathophysiology of these 2 benign obstructing lesions of the esophagus.

AB - Background: Only few data exist on the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Objective: To study the epidemiology and management of esophageal strictures and rings. Design: Case-control study. Setting: Endoscopic data repository of U.S. gastroenterology practices from 1998 to 2003 (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative). Patients: Case subjects included 7287 patients with strictures and 4993 patients with rings. The control group consisted of 124,120 patients without endoscopic evidence of esophageal stenosis. Interventions: Esophageal dilation. Main Outcome Measurements: Patient demographics, types and diameters of esophageal dilators, frequency of repeat dilations. Results: Strictures displayed a male predominance, and rings displayed a small female predominance. Compared with the control population, strictures and rings both occurred most frequently in elderly white patients. Dysphagia and reflux were the most common indications for dilation in both conditions. Compared with strictures, rings were treated more often with larger dilators and rubber bougies. One-year rates of repeat dilation for strictures and rings were 13% and 4%, respectively. The mean interval length between repeat dilations was 82 days for strictures and 184 days for rings. Limitations: Only a limited amount of information about individual patients was retrievable from the electronic database. Conclusions: The variations in the demographic characteristics and the treatment practice allude to differences in the underlying pathophysiology of these 2 benign obstructing lesions of the esophagus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34648854461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34648854461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.031

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 17905007

AN - SCOPUS:34648854461

VL - 66

SP - 670

EP - 675

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -