Postoperative Controversies in the Management of Free Flap Surgery in the Head and Neck

Steven B. Cannady, Kyle Hatten, Mark Wax

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Free tissue transfer is the gold standard for reconstructing head and neck defects. Free flap success approaches 95% in centers with experience, affording unparalleled ability to restore form and function in cancer, trauma, or other major composite tissue loss. It is critical to manage the perioperative variables that predict success; several areas of controversy have not yet reached consensus. This review focuses on postoperative anticoagulation, fluid management, and flap monitoring methods. These areas of controversy potentially influence flap survival. We review published practices considered within the standard of care, why controversy remains, and future directions to reach standardization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFacial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Free Tissue Flaps
Neck
Head
Standard of Care
Wounds and Injuries
Neoplasms
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Anticoagulation
  • Flap monitoring
  • Fluid management
  • Free flap
  • Head and neck defect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Postoperative Controversies in the Management of Free Flap Surgery in the Head and Neck. / Cannady, Steven B.; Hatten, Kyle; Wax, Mark.

In: Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{849ff2e5c784481594e31ff326854e49,
title = "Postoperative Controversies in the Management of Free Flap Surgery in the Head and Neck",
abstract = "Free tissue transfer is the gold standard for reconstructing head and neck defects. Free flap success approaches 95{\%} in centers with experience, affording unparalleled ability to restore form and function in cancer, trauma, or other major composite tissue loss. It is critical to manage the perioperative variables that predict success; several areas of controversy have not yet reached consensus. This review focuses on postoperative anticoagulation, fluid management, and flap monitoring methods. These areas of controversy potentially influence flap survival. We review published practices considered within the standard of care, why controversy remains, and future directions to reach standardization.",
keywords = "Anticoagulation, Flap monitoring, Fluid management, Free flap, Head and neck defect",
author = "Cannady, {Steven B.} and Kyle Hatten and Mark Wax",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.fsc.2016.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America",
issn = "1064-7406",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postoperative Controversies in the Management of Free Flap Surgery in the Head and Neck

AU - Cannady, Steven B.

AU - Hatten, Kyle

AU - Wax, Mark

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Free tissue transfer is the gold standard for reconstructing head and neck defects. Free flap success approaches 95% in centers with experience, affording unparalleled ability to restore form and function in cancer, trauma, or other major composite tissue loss. It is critical to manage the perioperative variables that predict success; several areas of controversy have not yet reached consensus. This review focuses on postoperative anticoagulation, fluid management, and flap monitoring methods. These areas of controversy potentially influence flap survival. We review published practices considered within the standard of care, why controversy remains, and future directions to reach standardization.

AB - Free tissue transfer is the gold standard for reconstructing head and neck defects. Free flap success approaches 95% in centers with experience, affording unparalleled ability to restore form and function in cancer, trauma, or other major composite tissue loss. It is critical to manage the perioperative variables that predict success; several areas of controversy have not yet reached consensus. This review focuses on postoperative anticoagulation, fluid management, and flap monitoring methods. These areas of controversy potentially influence flap survival. We review published practices considered within the standard of care, why controversy remains, and future directions to reach standardization.

KW - Anticoagulation

KW - Flap monitoring

KW - Fluid management

KW - Free flap

KW - Head and neck defect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973651882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973651882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.03.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 27400844

AN - SCOPUS:84973651882

JO - Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America

JF - Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America

SN - 1064-7406

ER -